Y X Xiong, Z Cai, J Liao, Y J Zhao, Y Li, Y He, H Q Niu, K Zhao
{"title":"【万古霉素连续静脉滴注治疗中枢神经系统感染的临床分析】。","authors":"Y X Xiong, Z Cai, J Liao, Y J Zhao, Y Li, Y He, H Q Niu, K Zhao","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241010-02282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with central nervous system infections (CNSI) after neurosurgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from September 2010 to September 2022. Based on vancomycin administration regimens, the patients were divided into the intermittent intravenous infusion (IIV) group and the continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) group. Hematological indices were evaluated before and after vancomycin therapy to compare short-term efficacy and safety between the two regimens.A total of 90 patients were included, including 50 patients in the IIV group [28 males and 22 females, aged (50.9±12.6) years] and 40 patients in the CIV group [29 males and 11 females, aged (54.5±13.3) years].The CIV group demonstrated significantly lower post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR: 7.0±4.4 vs 9.2±4.8), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) (6.1±6.0 vs 9.9±8.2), and incidence of augmented renal clearance (ARC) [10.0% (4/40) vs 42.0% (21/50)] compared to the IIV group. Additionally, the CIV group achieved higher trough concentration target attainment rates [85.0% (34/40) vs 56.0% (28/50)] and superior short-term clinical efficacy [72.5% (29/40) vs 52.0% (26/50)]than those in the IIV group (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant difference in nephrotoxicity was observed between the two groups after the treatment (<i>P</i>>0.05).Compared to IIV, CIV can improve trough concentration target attainment, reduced ARC incidence, and enhance therapeutic efficacy in CNSI patients, suggesting that CIV may be a more optimized administration strategy for CNSI management.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 21","pages":"1746-1750"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical analysis of vancomycin continuous intravenous infusion in the treatment of patients with central nervous system infections].\",\"authors\":\"Y X Xiong, Z Cai, J Liao, Y J Zhao, Y Li, Y He, H Q Niu, K Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241010-02282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with central nervous system infections (CNSI) after neurosurgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from September 2010 to September 2022. Based on vancomycin administration regimens, the patients were divided into the intermittent intravenous infusion (IIV) group and the continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) group. Hematological indices were evaluated before and after vancomycin therapy to compare short-term efficacy and safety between the two regimens.A total of 90 patients were included, including 50 patients in the IIV group [28 males and 22 females, aged (50.9±12.6) years] and 40 patients in the CIV group [29 males and 11 females, aged (54.5±13.3) years].The CIV group demonstrated significantly lower post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR: 7.0±4.4 vs 9.2±4.8), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) (6.1±6.0 vs 9.9±8.2), and incidence of augmented renal clearance (ARC) [10.0% (4/40) vs 42.0% (21/50)] compared to the IIV group. Additionally, the CIV group achieved higher trough concentration target attainment rates [85.0% (34/40) vs 56.0% (28/50)] and superior short-term clinical efficacy [72.5% (29/40) vs 52.0% (26/50)]than those in the IIV group (<i>P</i><0.05). No significant difference in nephrotoxicity was observed between the two groups after the treatment (<i>P</i>>0.05).Compared to IIV, CIV can improve trough concentration target attainment, reduced ARC incidence, and enhance therapeutic efficacy in CNSI patients, suggesting that CIV may be a more optimized administration strategy for CNSI management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"volume\":\"105 21\",\"pages\":\"1746-1750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241010-02282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241010-02282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究回顾性分析华中科技大学同济医学院同济医院神经外科2010年9月至2022年9月神经外科术后中枢神经系统感染(CNSI)患者的临床资料。根据万古霉素给药方案,将患者分为间歇静脉输注组(IIV)和连续静脉输注组(CIV)。评估万古霉素治疗前后的血液学指标,比较两种治疗方案的短期疗效和安全性。共纳入90例患者,其中IIV组50例[男28例,女22例,年龄(50.9±12.6)岁],CIV组40例[男29例,女11例,年龄(54.5±13.3)岁]。CIV组治疗后中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR: 7.0±4.4 vs 9.2±4.8)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)(6.1±6.0 vs 9.9±8.2)和增强肾清除率(ARC)发生率(10.0% (4/40)vs 42.0%(21/50))显著低于IIV组。此外,CIV组的谷浓度目标达成率(85.0% (34/40)vs 56.0%(28/50))高于IIV组,短期临床疗效(72.5% (29/40)vs 52.0%(26/50))优于IIV组(p < 0.05)。与iv相比,CIV可提高CNSI患者的谷浓度目标,降低ARC发生率,提高治疗效果,提示CIV可能是CNSI治疗的更优化的给药策略。
[Clinical analysis of vancomycin continuous intravenous infusion in the treatment of patients with central nervous system infections].
This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with central nervous system infections (CNSI) after neurosurgery in the Department of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, from September 2010 to September 2022. Based on vancomycin administration regimens, the patients were divided into the intermittent intravenous infusion (IIV) group and the continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) group. Hematological indices were evaluated before and after vancomycin therapy to compare short-term efficacy and safety between the two regimens.A total of 90 patients were included, including 50 patients in the IIV group [28 males and 22 females, aged (50.9±12.6) years] and 40 patients in the CIV group [29 males and 11 females, aged (54.5±13.3) years].The CIV group demonstrated significantly lower post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR: 7.0±4.4 vs 9.2±4.8), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) (6.1±6.0 vs 9.9±8.2), and incidence of augmented renal clearance (ARC) [10.0% (4/40) vs 42.0% (21/50)] compared to the IIV group. Additionally, the CIV group achieved higher trough concentration target attainment rates [85.0% (34/40) vs 56.0% (28/50)] and superior short-term clinical efficacy [72.5% (29/40) vs 52.0% (26/50)]than those in the IIV group (P<0.05). No significant difference in nephrotoxicity was observed between the two groups after the treatment (P>0.05).Compared to IIV, CIV can improve trough concentration target attainment, reduced ARC incidence, and enhance therapeutic efficacy in CNSI patients, suggesting that CIV may be a more optimized administration strategy for CNSI management.