患有慢性腰痛的成年人对跑步的恐惧和信念:来自小行星随机对照试验的混合方法研究。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Christopher Neason, Claire L Samanna, Scott D Tagliaferri, Daniel L Belavý, Paul Buntine, Matthew J Clarkson, Clint T Miller, Ulrike H Mitchell, Niamh L Mundell, David Scott, Patrick J Owen
{"title":"患有慢性腰痛的成年人对跑步的恐惧和信念:来自小行星随机对照试验的混合方法研究。","authors":"Christopher Neason, Claire L Samanna, Scott D Tagliaferri, Daniel L Belavý, Paul Buntine, Matthew J Clarkson, Clint T Miller, Ulrike H Mitchell, Niamh L Mundell, David Scott, Patrick J Owen","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00861-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The stigma that running is unsafe for people with chronic low back pain (LBP) persists, despite recent studies showing that running training is feasible and beneficial in chronic LBP. We examined the beliefs about running in adults with chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty adults (20 female, mean [SD] age 33 [6] years) with non-specific chronic LBP were randomised to a 12 week digitally-delivered run-walk interval training intervention or waitlist control (ACTRN12622001276741). Participants completed the activity specific beliefs questionnaire (4-point Likert scale) and recorded pain intensity at baseline and 12 weeks. Running intervention participants (n = 19) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to randomisation, 10 participants (25%; intervention: n = 6) reported that running was unsafe. At follow-up, greater mean improvements were seen in the intervention group in the belief that running is safe. Specifically, belief in the safety of running on gravel (β [95%CI] 0.52[0.20, 0.84] points, P = 0.001), pavement (β [95%CI] 0.54[0.18, 0.89] points, P = 0.003), treadmill (β [95%CI] 0.49[0.14, 0.84] points, P = 0.006), and sprinting (β [95%CI]: 0.56[0.06, 1.06] points, P = 0.029) improved more than in the control group. Reflexive thematic analysis identified four themes: (a) fear and concerns that running may increase pain or lead to an injury, (b) negative beliefs are influenced by healthcare professionals and past experience, (c) fears can be overcome and be replaced with new beliefs, and (d) positive experience drives change in beliefs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Completing a 12 week run-walk interval training intervention led to more positive beliefs about running in adults with chronic LBP. The identified themes can assist clinicians in addressing barriers and facilitators to implementing running interventions for chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622001276741. Registered on 29 September 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fears and beliefs about running in adults with chronic low back pain: a mixed methods study from the ASTEROID randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Neason, Claire L Samanna, Scott D Tagliaferri, Daniel L Belavý, Paul Buntine, Matthew J Clarkson, Clint T Miller, Ulrike H Mitchell, Niamh L Mundell, David Scott, Patrick J Owen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00861-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The stigma that running is unsafe for people with chronic low back pain (LBP) persists, despite recent studies showing that running training is feasible and beneficial in chronic LBP. We examined the beliefs about running in adults with chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty adults (20 female, mean [SD] age 33 [6] years) with non-specific chronic LBP were randomised to a 12 week digitally-delivered run-walk interval training intervention or waitlist control (ACTRN12622001276741). Participants completed the activity specific beliefs questionnaire (4-point Likert scale) and recorded pain intensity at baseline and 12 weeks. Running intervention participants (n = 19) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews at 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to randomisation, 10 participants (25%; intervention: n = 6) reported that running was unsafe. At follow-up, greater mean improvements were seen in the intervention group in the belief that running is safe. Specifically, belief in the safety of running on gravel (β [95%CI] 0.52[0.20, 0.84] points, P = 0.001), pavement (β [95%CI] 0.54[0.18, 0.89] points, P = 0.003), treadmill (β [95%CI] 0.49[0.14, 0.84] points, P = 0.006), and sprinting (β [95%CI]: 0.56[0.06, 1.06] points, P = 0.029) improved more than in the control group. Reflexive thematic analysis identified four themes: (a) fear and concerns that running may increase pain or lead to an injury, (b) negative beliefs are influenced by healthcare professionals and past experience, (c) fears can be overcome and be replaced with new beliefs, and (d) positive experience drives change in beliefs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Completing a 12 week run-walk interval training intervention led to more positive beliefs about running in adults with chronic LBP. The identified themes can assist clinicians in addressing barriers and facilitators to implementing running interventions for chronic LBP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622001276741. Registered on 29 September 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00861-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00861-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管最近的研究表明跑步训练对慢性腰痛(LBP)患者是可行和有益的,但人们仍然认为跑步对慢性腰痛(LBP)患者是不安全的。我们调查了患有慢性腰痛的成年人对跑步的看法。方法:40名患有非特异性慢性腰痛的成年人(20名女性,平均[SD]年龄33岁)随机分为12周的数字传递跑走间歇训练干预组或候补组(ACTRN12622001276741)。参与者完成活动特定信念问卷(4点李克特量表),并记录基线和12周的疼痛强度。跑步干预参与者(n = 19)在第12周完成半结构化定性访谈。结果:随机化前,10名受试者(25%;干预组:n = 6)报告跑步不安全。在随访中,相信跑步是安全的干预组有了更大的平均改善。具体来说,在砾石(β [95%CI] 0.52[0.20, 0.84]分,P = 0.001)、路面(β [95%CI] 0.54[0.18, 0.89]分,P = 0.003)、跑步机(β [95%CI] 0.49[0.14, 0.84]分,P = 0.006)和短跑(β [95%CI]: 0.56[0.06, 1.06]分,P = 0.029)上跑步的安全性的信念比对照组提高得更多。反思性专题分析确定了四个主题:(a)对跑步可能增加疼痛或导致受伤的恐惧和担忧,(b)消极信念受到保健专业人员和过去经验的影响,(c)恐惧可以克服并被新的信念所取代,以及(d)积极的经验推动信念的改变。结论:完成为期12周的跑步-步行间歇训练干预后,慢性腰痛患者对跑步有了更积极的看法。确定的主题可以帮助临床医生解决实施慢性腰痛跑步干预的障碍和促进因素。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册:ACTRN12622001276741。于2022年9月29日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fears and beliefs about running in adults with chronic low back pain: a mixed methods study from the ASTEROID randomised controlled trial.

Background: The stigma that running is unsafe for people with chronic low back pain (LBP) persists, despite recent studies showing that running training is feasible and beneficial in chronic LBP. We examined the beliefs about running in adults with chronic LBP.

Methods: Forty adults (20 female, mean [SD] age 33 [6] years) with non-specific chronic LBP were randomised to a 12 week digitally-delivered run-walk interval training intervention or waitlist control (ACTRN12622001276741). Participants completed the activity specific beliefs questionnaire (4-point Likert scale) and recorded pain intensity at baseline and 12 weeks. Running intervention participants (n = 19) completed semi-structured qualitative interviews at 12 weeks.

Results: Prior to randomisation, 10 participants (25%; intervention: n = 6) reported that running was unsafe. At follow-up, greater mean improvements were seen in the intervention group in the belief that running is safe. Specifically, belief in the safety of running on gravel (β [95%CI] 0.52[0.20, 0.84] points, P = 0.001), pavement (β [95%CI] 0.54[0.18, 0.89] points, P = 0.003), treadmill (β [95%CI] 0.49[0.14, 0.84] points, P = 0.006), and sprinting (β [95%CI]: 0.56[0.06, 1.06] points, P = 0.029) improved more than in the control group. Reflexive thematic analysis identified four themes: (a) fear and concerns that running may increase pain or lead to an injury, (b) negative beliefs are influenced by healthcare professionals and past experience, (c) fears can be overcome and be replaced with new beliefs, and (d) positive experience drives change in beliefs.

Conclusions: Completing a 12 week run-walk interval training intervention led to more positive beliefs about running in adults with chronic LBP. The identified themes can assist clinicians in addressing barriers and facilitators to implementing running interventions for chronic LBP.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622001276741. Registered on 29 September 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine - Open
Sports Medicine - Open SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信