非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国人肾衰竭患者及其护理伙伴对透析方式选择的影响:一项定性研究

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Karen-Marie Eaton, Danelle Radney, Steven M Brunelli, Eric Weinhandl, Unini Odama, Francesca Tentori
{"title":"非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国人肾衰竭患者及其护理伙伴对透析方式选择的影响:一项定性研究","authors":"Karen-Marie Eaton, Danelle Radney, Steven M Brunelli, Eric Weinhandl, Unini Odama, Francesca Tentori","doi":"10.1177/08968608251345680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rationale and ObjectiveCompared to in-center hemodialysis, home dialysis may better address the needs of some individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, home dialysis utilization is lower in African American and Hispanic individuals with ESKD. We sought to identify the factors that most influence dialysis modality choice, specifically home dialysis, in these individuals and their care partners.Study DesignQualitative research study using focus groups.Setting and ParticipantsFifty-seven participants, including African American and Spanish-speaking Mexican American individuals on dialysis (both in-center and home) and care partners, were recruited to in-person focus groups in five US metropolitan areas. Mexican American focus groups were held in Spanish language and translated in real time by a certified interpreter; recordings for all focus groups were transcribed verbatim for analyses.Analytical ApproachParticipant responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis techniques.ResultsPhysician guidance was cited as the most important factor in making the initial modality decision for all groups. African American respondents primarily relied on healthcare professionals for information, but also seek independent validation (e.g., \"trust but verify\"). Mexican American respondents stated that trust in physician recommendation is largely unquestioned, influenced by factors such as cultural respect for physician authority, limited literacy, and language barriers. African American respondents desire additional education about modalities, particularly when they feel ready to comprehend content (sequenced to recognize how overwhelming it can be at the initial diagnosis of kidney failure). Although most individuals on dialysis and their care partners acknowledged the clinical benefits of home dialysis, significant barriers to choosing a home modality included the fear of being solely responsible for a complex procedure and loss of social interaction and/or support from other individuals on dialysis and center staff.LimitationsAs the focus groups were all conducted in metropolitan areas, the transferability of the findings to other settings is uncertain.ConclusionsImproved educational programs on dialysis modality choice should build on the strong preference for physician-led health information to better address educational needs of African American and Mexican American individuals facing the choice of a dialysis modality. Tackling issues pertaining to understanding kidney disease pathogenesis and addressing trust in healthcare professionals is necessary in African American individuals. In Mexican American communities, specific emphasis should be placed on addressing literacy and language barriers. Home dialysis educational material for both groups should also incorporate content regarding concerns about safety and social isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19969,"journal":{"name":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","volume":" ","pages":"8968608251345680"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences on dialysis modality choice among African American and Mexican American individuals with kidney failure and their care partners: A qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Karen-Marie Eaton, Danelle Radney, Steven M Brunelli, Eric Weinhandl, Unini Odama, Francesca Tentori\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08968608251345680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rationale and ObjectiveCompared to in-center hemodialysis, home dialysis may better address the needs of some individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, home dialysis utilization is lower in African American and Hispanic individuals with ESKD. We sought to identify the factors that most influence dialysis modality choice, specifically home dialysis, in these individuals and their care partners.Study DesignQualitative research study using focus groups.Setting and ParticipantsFifty-seven participants, including African American and Spanish-speaking Mexican American individuals on dialysis (both in-center and home) and care partners, were recruited to in-person focus groups in five US metropolitan areas. Mexican American focus groups were held in Spanish language and translated in real time by a certified interpreter; recordings for all focus groups were transcribed verbatim for analyses.Analytical ApproachParticipant responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis techniques.ResultsPhysician guidance was cited as the most important factor in making the initial modality decision for all groups. African American respondents primarily relied on healthcare professionals for information, but also seek independent validation (e.g., \\\"trust but verify\\\"). Mexican American respondents stated that trust in physician recommendation is largely unquestioned, influenced by factors such as cultural respect for physician authority, limited literacy, and language barriers. African American respondents desire additional education about modalities, particularly when they feel ready to comprehend content (sequenced to recognize how overwhelming it can be at the initial diagnosis of kidney failure). Although most individuals on dialysis and their care partners acknowledged the clinical benefits of home dialysis, significant barriers to choosing a home modality included the fear of being solely responsible for a complex procedure and loss of social interaction and/or support from other individuals on dialysis and center staff.LimitationsAs the focus groups were all conducted in metropolitan areas, the transferability of the findings to other settings is uncertain.ConclusionsImproved educational programs on dialysis modality choice should build on the strong preference for physician-led health information to better address educational needs of African American and Mexican American individuals facing the choice of a dialysis modality. Tackling issues pertaining to understanding kidney disease pathogenesis and addressing trust in healthcare professionals is necessary in African American individuals. In Mexican American communities, specific emphasis should be placed on addressing literacy and language barriers. Home dialysis educational material for both groups should also incorporate content regarding concerns about safety and social isolation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8968608251345680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peritoneal Dialysis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251345680\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peritoneal Dialysis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608251345680","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由和目的与中心血液透析相比,家庭透析可能更好地满足一些终末期肾脏疾病(ESKD)患者的需要。然而,非裔美国人和西班牙裔ESKD患者的家庭透析使用率较低。我们试图确定最影响透析方式选择的因素,特别是家庭透析,在这些个人和他们的护理伙伴中。研究设计采用焦点小组的定性研究。环境和参与者57名参与者,包括非裔美国人和说西班牙语的墨西哥裔美国人透析个体(包括中心和家庭)和护理伙伴,被招募到美国五个大都市的面对面焦点小组。墨西哥裔美国人焦点小组以西班牙语举行,并由一名经过认证的口译员实时翻译;所有焦点小组的录音都逐字抄录以供分析。分析方法使用归纳主题分析技术对参与者的回答进行分析。结果所有患者均认为医师指导是决定初始手术方式的最重要因素。非裔美国人受访者主要依赖医疗保健专业人员获取信息,但也寻求独立验证(例如,“信任但验证”)。墨西哥裔美国人受访者表示,对医生建议的信任在很大程度上是毋庸置疑的,这受到诸如对医生权威的文化尊重、有限的文化素养和语言障碍等因素的影响。非裔美国人受访者希望接受更多关于模式的教育,特别是当他们准备好理解内容时(排序以认识到在肾衰竭的初步诊断中它可能是多么压倒性)。尽管大多数透析患者及其护理伙伴承认家庭透析的临床益处,但选择家庭透析方式的重大障碍包括害怕独自负责复杂的程序,以及失去社会互动和/或其他透析患者和中心工作人员的支持。局限性由于焦点小组都是在大都市地区进行的,因此研究结果在其他环境中的可转移性尚不确定。结论改善透析方式选择的教育计划应建立在对医生主导的健康信息的强烈偏好之上,以更好地满足面临透析方式选择的非裔美国人和墨西哥裔美国人的教育需求。解决问题有关了解肾脏疾病的发病机制和解决在医疗保健专业人员的信任是必要的非洲裔美国人。在墨西哥裔美国人社区,应特别强调解决识字和语言障碍问题。针对这两个群体的家庭透析教育材料还应纳入有关安全和社会隔离问题的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influences on dialysis modality choice among African American and Mexican American individuals with kidney failure and their care partners: A qualitative study.

Rationale and ObjectiveCompared to in-center hemodialysis, home dialysis may better address the needs of some individuals with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, home dialysis utilization is lower in African American and Hispanic individuals with ESKD. We sought to identify the factors that most influence dialysis modality choice, specifically home dialysis, in these individuals and their care partners.Study DesignQualitative research study using focus groups.Setting and ParticipantsFifty-seven participants, including African American and Spanish-speaking Mexican American individuals on dialysis (both in-center and home) and care partners, were recruited to in-person focus groups in five US metropolitan areas. Mexican American focus groups were held in Spanish language and translated in real time by a certified interpreter; recordings for all focus groups were transcribed verbatim for analyses.Analytical ApproachParticipant responses were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis techniques.ResultsPhysician guidance was cited as the most important factor in making the initial modality decision for all groups. African American respondents primarily relied on healthcare professionals for information, but also seek independent validation (e.g., "trust but verify"). Mexican American respondents stated that trust in physician recommendation is largely unquestioned, influenced by factors such as cultural respect for physician authority, limited literacy, and language barriers. African American respondents desire additional education about modalities, particularly when they feel ready to comprehend content (sequenced to recognize how overwhelming it can be at the initial diagnosis of kidney failure). Although most individuals on dialysis and their care partners acknowledged the clinical benefits of home dialysis, significant barriers to choosing a home modality included the fear of being solely responsible for a complex procedure and loss of social interaction and/or support from other individuals on dialysis and center staff.LimitationsAs the focus groups were all conducted in metropolitan areas, the transferability of the findings to other settings is uncertain.ConclusionsImproved educational programs on dialysis modality choice should build on the strong preference for physician-led health information to better address educational needs of African American and Mexican American individuals facing the choice of a dialysis modality. Tackling issues pertaining to understanding kidney disease pathogenesis and addressing trust in healthcare professionals is necessary in African American individuals. In Mexican American communities, specific emphasis should be placed on addressing literacy and language barriers. Home dialysis educational material for both groups should also incorporate content regarding concerns about safety and social isolation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peritoneal Dialysis International
Peritoneal Dialysis International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peritoneal Dialysis International (PDI) is an international publication dedicated to peritoneal dialysis. PDI welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of peritoneal dialysis from scientists working in the peritoneal dialysis field around the world. Peritoneal Dialysis International is included in Index Medicus and indexed in Current Contents/Clinical Practice, the Science Citation Index, and Excerpta Medica (Nephrology/Urology Core Journal). It is also abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts (CA), as well as being indexed in Embase as a priority journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信