不控制吸电子烟及限制吸电子烟调查措施的发展。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ebbie Kalan, Tara L Queen, Jennifer R Mendel Sheldon, Marissa G Hall, Paschal J Sheeran, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer
{"title":"不控制吸电子烟及限制吸电子烟调查措施的发展。","authors":"Ebbie Kalan, Tara L Queen, Jennifer R Mendel Sheldon, Marissa G Hall, Paschal J Sheeran, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some e-cigarette users experience uncontrolled vaping, using vapes more than preferred, but validated measures of this experience are lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate scales measuring uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint among US adults and youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed new survey measures of uncontrolled vaping and restraint frequency based on qualitative research and refined them after cognitive interviews. In Study 1, we used data from a convenience sample of 950 US adult e-cigarette users to establish psychometrically sound scales. In Study 2, we used data from a nationally representative sample of 1138 US adolescents and adults to finalize the scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 produced reliable scales for uncontrolled vaping perception (5 items), uncontrolled vaping consequences (4 items), and vaping restraint (4 items) (αs = .87-.93). Convergent and criterion validity were demonstrated by stronger associations of uncontrolled vaping with use behaviors (median r = .65 vs. .39) and somewhat weaker associations with measures of limiting use (median r = .44 vs. .51). Higher vaping restraint scores were associated with measures of limiting use (r = .46 to .59) and quit intentions (r = .23 to .48). Study 2 confirmed these results and further refined the scales to 3 items each.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The newly developed scales for uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint demonstrated sound psychometric properties in both convenience and nationally representative samples. These measures can inform e-cigarette regulatory actions and guide the development of vaping management and cessation approaches.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study introduces reliable and valid scales to measure uncontrolled vaping perceptions, uncontrolled vaping consequences, and vaping restraint among e-cigarette users. These tools provide a nuanced understanding of vaping behaviors, distinguishing internal perceptions of overuse from external consequences such as feedback from others or interference with daily activities. By capturing these dimensions, the scales offer insights beyond traditional nicotine dependence measures, supporting research and interventions tailored to vaping-specific challenges. The findings highlight the importance of addressing uncontrolled vaping through regulatory and clinical efforts, informing strategies to reduce excessive vaping, and promoting self-regulation among e-cigarette users.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of survey measures of uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint.\",\"authors\":\"Ebbie Kalan, Tara L Queen, Jennifer R Mendel Sheldon, Marissa G Hall, Paschal J Sheeran, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Some e-cigarette users experience uncontrolled vaping, using vapes more than preferred, but validated measures of this experience are lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate scales measuring uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint among US adults and youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed new survey measures of uncontrolled vaping and restraint frequency based on qualitative research and refined them after cognitive interviews. In Study 1, we used data from a convenience sample of 950 US adult e-cigarette users to establish psychometrically sound scales. In Study 2, we used data from a nationally representative sample of 1138 US adolescents and adults to finalize the scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Study 1 produced reliable scales for uncontrolled vaping perception (5 items), uncontrolled vaping consequences (4 items), and vaping restraint (4 items) (αs = .87-.93). Convergent and criterion validity were demonstrated by stronger associations of uncontrolled vaping with use behaviors (median r = .65 vs. .39) and somewhat weaker associations with measures of limiting use (median r = .44 vs. .51). Higher vaping restraint scores were associated with measures of limiting use (r = .46 to .59) and quit intentions (r = .23 to .48). Study 2 confirmed these results and further refined the scales to 3 items each.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The newly developed scales for uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint demonstrated sound psychometric properties in both convenience and nationally representative samples. These measures can inform e-cigarette regulatory actions and guide the development of vaping management and cessation approaches.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study introduces reliable and valid scales to measure uncontrolled vaping perceptions, uncontrolled vaping consequences, and vaping restraint among e-cigarette users. These tools provide a nuanced understanding of vaping behaviors, distinguishing internal perceptions of overuse from external consequences such as feedback from others or interference with daily activities. By capturing these dimensions, the scales offer insights beyond traditional nicotine dependence measures, supporting research and interventions tailored to vaping-specific challenges. The findings highlight the importance of addressing uncontrolled vaping through regulatory and clinical efforts, informing strategies to reduce excessive vaping, and promoting self-regulation among e-cigarette users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf127\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf127","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:一些电子烟使用者体验到不受控制的电子烟,使用电子烟的次数超过了他们的偏好,但缺乏对这种体验的有效测量。这项研究旨在开发和验证测量美国成年人和青少年中不受控制的电子烟和限制电子烟的量表。方法:在定性研究的基础上,制定了新的不受控电子烟和限制频率的调查措施,并通过认知访谈对其进行了细化。在研究1中,我们使用了950名美国成年电子烟使用者的便利样本数据来建立心理测量声量表。在研究2中,我们使用了来自1138名美国青少年和成年人的全国代表性样本的数据来确定量表。结果:研究1编制了可靠的吸电子烟感知量表(5项)、吸电子烟后果量表(4项)和吸电子烟约束量表(4项)(αs = 0.87 ~ 0.93)。不受控制的电子烟与使用行为之间存在更强的关联(中位数r =。65 vs. 39),与限制使用措施的相关性较弱(中位数r =。44 vs. 51)。较高的电子烟限制得分与限制使用的措施相关(r =)。46 ~ 0.59)和戒烟意向(r =。23至0.48)。研究2证实了这些结果,并进一步将量表细化为3个项目。结论:新开发的不受控电子烟和限制电子烟量表在方便样本和全国代表性样本中都表现出良好的心理测量特性。这些措施可以为电子烟监管行动提供信息,并指导电子烟管理和戒烟方法的发展。含义:本研究引入了可靠有效的量表来测量电子烟使用者对不受控制的电子烟的感知、不受控制的电子烟后果和电子烟的克制。这些工具提供了对电子烟行为的细致理解,将内部对过度使用的感知与外部后果(如他人的反馈或对日常活动的干扰)区分开来。通过捕捉这些维度,该量表提供了超越传统尼古丁依赖测量的见解,支持针对电子烟特定挑战的研究和干预措施。研究结果强调了通过监管和临床努力解决不受控制的电子烟问题的重要性,告知减少过度电子烟的策略,并促进电子烟用户的自我监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of survey measures of uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint.

Introduction: Some e-cigarette users experience uncontrolled vaping, using vapes more than preferred, but validated measures of this experience are lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate scales measuring uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint among US adults and youth.

Methods: We developed new survey measures of uncontrolled vaping and restraint frequency based on qualitative research and refined them after cognitive interviews. In Study 1, we used data from a convenience sample of 950 US adult e-cigarette users to establish psychometrically sound scales. In Study 2, we used data from a nationally representative sample of 1138 US adolescents and adults to finalize the scales.

Results: Study 1 produced reliable scales for uncontrolled vaping perception (5 items), uncontrolled vaping consequences (4 items), and vaping restraint (4 items) (αs = .87-.93). Convergent and criterion validity were demonstrated by stronger associations of uncontrolled vaping with use behaviors (median r = .65 vs. .39) and somewhat weaker associations with measures of limiting use (median r = .44 vs. .51). Higher vaping restraint scores were associated with measures of limiting use (r = .46 to .59) and quit intentions (r = .23 to .48). Study 2 confirmed these results and further refined the scales to 3 items each.

Conclusions: The newly developed scales for uncontrolled vaping and vaping restraint demonstrated sound psychometric properties in both convenience and nationally representative samples. These measures can inform e-cigarette regulatory actions and guide the development of vaping management and cessation approaches.

Implications: This study introduces reliable and valid scales to measure uncontrolled vaping perceptions, uncontrolled vaping consequences, and vaping restraint among e-cigarette users. These tools provide a nuanced understanding of vaping behaviors, distinguishing internal perceptions of overuse from external consequences such as feedback from others or interference with daily activities. By capturing these dimensions, the scales offer insights beyond traditional nicotine dependence measures, supporting research and interventions tailored to vaping-specific challenges. The findings highlight the importance of addressing uncontrolled vaping through regulatory and clinical efforts, informing strategies to reduce excessive vaping, and promoting self-regulation among e-cigarette users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信