{"title":"米勒费雪综合征中抗gq1b IgG抗体频率的中国单中心研究","authors":"Pengfei Shao, Wenhui Wu, Xin Zhang, Haifeng Chen, Yun Xu, Qing Ye","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08290-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody has been traditionally regarded as a sensitive marker for Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). Nevertheless, its prevalence might vary across regions and could be affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the positivity rate of the anti-GQ1b IgG antibody among MFS patients admitted to a single Chinese center and to examine the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients diagnosed with MFS and admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to March 2024. Anti-ganglioside antibodies were tested in acute-phase serum samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immune-dot assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 72 patients admitted for MFS, 51 were tested for ganglioside antibodies. Only 9 (17.65%) of the tested patients were found to have the anti-GQ1b IgG antibody. The positivity rate of the antibody was comparable between patients with the complete form of MFS and those with the incomplete form (17.39% vs. 17.86%, P = 0.965). Additionally, the positivity rate was significantly lower during and after the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic (8.33% vs. 40.00%, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody is infrequently detected in MFS patients admitted to our center, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Future prospective multicenter investigations are expected to contribute significantly to the further clarification of the prevalence of anti-GQ1b IgG antibody in MFS patients across various regions of China.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of anti-GQ1b IgG antibody in miller fisher syndrome: a Chinese single center study.\",\"authors\":\"Pengfei Shao, Wenhui Wu, Xin Zhang, Haifeng Chen, Yun Xu, Qing Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10072-025-08290-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody has been traditionally regarded as a sensitive marker for Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). Nevertheless, its prevalence might vary across regions and could be affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the positivity rate of the anti-GQ1b IgG antibody among MFS patients admitted to a single Chinese center and to examine the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients diagnosed with MFS and admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to March 2024. Anti-ganglioside antibodies were tested in acute-phase serum samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immune-dot assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 72 patients admitted for MFS, 51 were tested for ganglioside antibodies. Only 9 (17.65%) of the tested patients were found to have the anti-GQ1b IgG antibody. The positivity rate of the antibody was comparable between patients with the complete form of MFS and those with the incomplete form (17.39% vs. 17.86%, P = 0.965). Additionally, the positivity rate was significantly lower during and after the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic (8.33% vs. 40.00%, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody is infrequently detected in MFS patients admitted to our center, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Future prospective multicenter investigations are expected to contribute significantly to the further clarification of the prevalence of anti-GQ1b IgG antibody in MFS patients across various regions of China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08290-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08290-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抗gq1b IgG抗体一直被认为是米勒费雪综合征(MFS)的敏感标志物。然而,其流行率可能因地区而异,并可能受到2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的影响。本回顾性研究旨在评估中国单一中心收治的MFS患者中抗gq1b IgG抗体的阳性率,并探讨COVID-19大流行对其的影响。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2024年3月收治的MFS患者的病历。采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)或免疫点法检测急性期血清样品中的抗神经节苷脂抗体。结果:72例MFS患者中,51例接受神经节苷脂抗体检测。仅9例(17.65%)检测出抗gq1b IgG抗体。抗体阳性率在完全型和不完全型MFS患者之间具有可比性(17.39% vs. 17.86%, P = 0.965)。此外,新冠肺炎大流行期间和大流行后的阳性率明显低于大流行前(8.33%比40.00%,P = 0.007)。结论:在我院收治的MFS患者中,抗gq1b IgG抗体检测较少,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间和之后。未来的前瞻性多中心研究有望进一步明确中国不同地区MFS患者中抗gq1b IgG抗体的流行情况。
Frequency of anti-GQ1b IgG antibody in miller fisher syndrome: a Chinese single center study.
Background: The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody has been traditionally regarded as a sensitive marker for Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). Nevertheless, its prevalence might vary across regions and could be affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the positivity rate of the anti-GQ1b IgG antibody among MFS patients admitted to a single Chinese center and to examine the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic thereon.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients diagnosed with MFS and admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to March 2024. Anti-ganglioside antibodies were tested in acute-phase serum samples using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immune-dot assays.
Results: Of the 72 patients admitted for MFS, 51 were tested for ganglioside antibodies. Only 9 (17.65%) of the tested patients were found to have the anti-GQ1b IgG antibody. The positivity rate of the antibody was comparable between patients with the complete form of MFS and those with the incomplete form (17.39% vs. 17.86%, P = 0.965). Additionally, the positivity rate was significantly lower during and after the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic (8.33% vs. 40.00%, P = 0.007).
Conclusions: The anti-GQ1b IgG antibody is infrequently detected in MFS patients admitted to our center, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Future prospective multicenter investigations are expected to contribute significantly to the further clarification of the prevalence of anti-GQ1b IgG antibody in MFS patients across various regions of China.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.