trna衍生片段作为疑似急性脑卒中诊断生物标志物的验证分析和量化方法的局限性。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102553
Tamar Woudenberg, M Leontien van der Bent, Daphne A L van den Homberg, T Truc My Nguyen, Marieke J H Wermer, Ido R van den Wijngaard, Paul H A Quax, A Yaël Nossent, Nyika D Kruyt
{"title":"trna衍生片段作为疑似急性脑卒中诊断生物标志物的验证分析和量化方法的局限性。","authors":"Tamar Woudenberg, M Leontien van der Bent, Daphne A L van den Homberg, T Truc My Nguyen, Marieke J H Wermer, Ido R van den Wijngaard, Paul H A Quax, A Yaël Nossent, Nyika D Kruyt","doi":"10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In acute stroke, timely diagnosis is essential to prevent extensive neuronal damage and improve patient outcomes. However, differentiating between ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and stroke mimics remains challenging. Transfer RNA-derived fragments (tRFs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these stroke subtypes. Here we used reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to investigate the expression of specific tRFs that we previously identified in small RNA sequencing data as potential biomarkers. Out of 12 measured tRFs, only the fragments ArgTCG<sup>53-67</sup> and TyrGTA<sup>1-19</sup> showed a trend for differential expression between stroke subtypes, but with insufficient predictive value to be of use in clinical practice. Combining expression data of specific tRFs into a joint model did not improve the predictive ability. Technical and computational challenges may compromise the reliability of tRF expression data from RNA sequencing, possibly explaining our inability to validate the specific tRFs as potential stroke biomarkers. Moreover, the limitations of RT-qPCR challenge a reliable quantification of these fragments even further. Our findings highlight the need for improved quantitative methods for tRF analysis to fully exploit their potential as clinically meaningful biomarkers. Addressing these technical barriers could unlock the diagnostic potential of tRFs, facilitating faster, more accurate stroke subtype identification in an acute setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":18821,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids","volume":"36 2","pages":"102553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of tRNA-derived fragments as diagnostic biomarkers in suspected acute stroke; limitations in analysis and quantification methods.\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Woudenberg, M Leontien van der Bent, Daphne A L van den Homberg, T Truc My Nguyen, Marieke J H Wermer, Ido R van den Wijngaard, Paul H A Quax, A Yaël Nossent, Nyika D Kruyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In acute stroke, timely diagnosis is essential to prevent extensive neuronal damage and improve patient outcomes. However, differentiating between ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and stroke mimics remains challenging. Transfer RNA-derived fragments (tRFs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these stroke subtypes. Here we used reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to investigate the expression of specific tRFs that we previously identified in small RNA sequencing data as potential biomarkers. Out of 12 measured tRFs, only the fragments ArgTCG<sup>53-67</sup> and TyrGTA<sup>1-19</sup> showed a trend for differential expression between stroke subtypes, but with insufficient predictive value to be of use in clinical practice. Combining expression data of specific tRFs into a joint model did not improve the predictive ability. Technical and computational challenges may compromise the reliability of tRF expression data from RNA sequencing, possibly explaining our inability to validate the specific tRFs as potential stroke biomarkers. Moreover, the limitations of RT-qPCR challenge a reliable quantification of these fragments even further. Our findings highlight the need for improved quantitative methods for tRF analysis to fully exploit their potential as clinically meaningful biomarkers. Addressing these technical barriers could unlock the diagnostic potential of tRFs, facilitating faster, more accurate stroke subtype identification in an acute setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"102553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12143625/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102553\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102553","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急性中风中,及时诊断对于预防广泛的神经元损伤和改善患者预后至关重要。然而,区分缺血性中风、脑出血和中风模拟仍然具有挑战性。转移rna衍生片段(tRFs)已成为区分这些中风亚型的潜在生物标志物。在这里,我们使用逆转录定量PCR (RT-qPCR)来研究特异性trf的表达,我们之前在小RNA测序数据中确定了这些trf作为潜在的生物标志物。在12个测得的tRFs中,只有ArgTCG53-67和TyrGTA1-19片段在脑卒中亚型之间表现出差异表达的趋势,但缺乏临床应用的预测价值。将特定tRFs的表达数据合并到联合模型中并不能提高预测能力。技术和计算方面的挑战可能会影响RNA测序中tRF表达数据的可靠性,这可能解释了我们无法验证特定tRF作为潜在中风生物标志物的原因。此外,RT-qPCR的局限性进一步挑战了这些片段的可靠定量。我们的研究结果强调需要改进tRF分析的定量方法,以充分利用其作为临床有意义的生物标志物的潜力。解决这些技术障碍可以释放trf的诊断潜力,促进在急性情况下更快、更准确地识别脑卒中亚型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of tRNA-derived fragments as diagnostic biomarkers in suspected acute stroke; limitations in analysis and quantification methods.

In acute stroke, timely diagnosis is essential to prevent extensive neuronal damage and improve patient outcomes. However, differentiating between ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, and stroke mimics remains challenging. Transfer RNA-derived fragments (tRFs) have emerged as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between these stroke subtypes. Here we used reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) to investigate the expression of specific tRFs that we previously identified in small RNA sequencing data as potential biomarkers. Out of 12 measured tRFs, only the fragments ArgTCG53-67 and TyrGTA1-19 showed a trend for differential expression between stroke subtypes, but with insufficient predictive value to be of use in clinical practice. Combining expression data of specific tRFs into a joint model did not improve the predictive ability. Technical and computational challenges may compromise the reliability of tRF expression data from RNA sequencing, possibly explaining our inability to validate the specific tRFs as potential stroke biomarkers. Moreover, the limitations of RT-qPCR challenge a reliable quantification of these fragments even further. Our findings highlight the need for improved quantitative methods for tRF analysis to fully exploit their potential as clinically meaningful biomarkers. Addressing these technical barriers could unlock the diagnostic potential of tRFs, facilitating faster, more accurate stroke subtype identification in an acute setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
336
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids is an international, open-access journal that publishes high-quality research in nucleic-acid-based therapeutics to treat and correct genetic and acquired diseases. It is the official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy and is built upon the success of Molecular Therapy. The journal focuses on gene- and oligonucleotide-based therapies and publishes peer-reviewed research, reviews, and commentaries. Its impact factor for 2022 is 8.8. The subject areas covered include the development of therapeutics based on nucleic acids and their derivatives, vector development for RNA-based therapeutics delivery, utilization of gene-modifying agents like Zn finger nucleases and triplex-forming oligonucleotides, pre-clinical target validation, safety and efficacy studies, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信