核达基皮瓣作为一种简单的手术方法治疗毛鞘疾病vs开放手术,平均随访30个月:临床试验。

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2025-01-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.39.12
Maryam Sarkardeh, Amin Dalili, Saeed Akhlaghi, Alireza Rezapanah, Peyman Saberian, Morteza Tavasolizadeh
{"title":"核达基皮瓣作为一种简单的手术方法治疗毛鞘疾病vs开放手术,平均随访30个月:临床试验。","authors":"Maryam Sarkardeh, Amin Dalili, Saeed Akhlaghi, Alireza Rezapanah, Peyman Saberian, Morteza Tavasolizadeh","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two common types of treatment for pilonidal disease include open and closed surgery. Closed surgery can be done with a Karydakis flap. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pilonidal sinus management between Karydakis flap and open surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical trial was conducted on patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus referred to the surgical clinics of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad from 2021 to 2022. Patients were nonrandomly divided into closed and open surgical treatment groups. Demographic information was collected from patients' medical records, the severity of the disease was obtained from operation notes, and time to recovery and time to return to work was obtained during follow-up visits. Pain intensity was collected on the first, tenth, and one month after surgery. To describe the data, the number and percentage for qualitative variables and mean± standard deviation for quantitative variables have been used. Normality of variables investigated by Shapiro-Wilk test. A comparison of quantitative variables was done with an independent sample t-test. The comparison of pain changes within each group was done using Friedman's test. A comparison of qualitative variables in two groups was done with the Chi-Square test. The significance level of the tests is 5%, and the software used is SPSS25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients (43 men and 17 women) with a mean age of 23.90 ± 6.57 years were included. The frequency of wound paresthesia (<i>P</i>=0.023), and recovery delay (<i>P</i><0.001) was lower in closed surgery compared to the open surgery group, and the frequency of discharge and superficial SSI (Surgical Site Infection) was higher in closed surgery (<i>P</i>=0.038). Pain severity decreased during the study (<i>P</i>=0.029) among the closed surgery group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closed surgical treatment was associated with shorter hospitalization time and return to work time than open surgery. Therefore, Karydakis flap can be a simple and acceptable method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Karydakis Flap as a Simple Surgical Method in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease V.S Open Surgery with Average 30-month-follow up: A Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Sarkardeh, Amin Dalili, Saeed Akhlaghi, Alireza Rezapanah, Peyman Saberian, Morteza Tavasolizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/mjiri.39.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two common types of treatment for pilonidal disease include open and closed surgery. Closed surgery can be done with a Karydakis flap. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pilonidal sinus management between Karydakis flap and open surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical trial was conducted on patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus referred to the surgical clinics of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad from 2021 to 2022. Patients were nonrandomly divided into closed and open surgical treatment groups. Demographic information was collected from patients' medical records, the severity of the disease was obtained from operation notes, and time to recovery and time to return to work was obtained during follow-up visits. Pain intensity was collected on the first, tenth, and one month after surgery. To describe the data, the number and percentage for qualitative variables and mean± standard deviation for quantitative variables have been used. Normality of variables investigated by Shapiro-Wilk test. A comparison of quantitative variables was done with an independent sample t-test. The comparison of pain changes within each group was done using Friedman's test. A comparison of qualitative variables in two groups was done with the Chi-Square test. The significance level of the tests is 5%, and the software used is SPSS25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients (43 men and 17 women) with a mean age of 23.90 ± 6.57 years were included. The frequency of wound paresthesia (<i>P</i>=0.023), and recovery delay (<i>P</i><0.001) was lower in closed surgery compared to the open surgery group, and the frequency of discharge and superficial SSI (Surgical Site Infection) was higher in closed surgery (<i>P</i>=0.038). Pain severity decreased during the study (<i>P</i>=0.029) among the closed surgery group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closed surgical treatment was associated with shorter hospitalization time and return to work time than open surgery. Therefore, Karydakis flap can be a simple and acceptable method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138641/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:两种常见的治疗方法包括开放和封闭手术。闭合性手术可以用核达基斯皮瓣完成。本研究的目的是比较核达基斯皮瓣和开放手术治疗毛膜窦的结果。方法:本临床试验选取了2021 - 2022年在马什哈德伊玛目礼萨医院外科诊所转诊的诊断为毛鞘窦的患者。患者非随机分为封闭和开放手术治疗组。从患者的医疗记录中收集人口统计信息,从手术记录中获得疾病的严重程度,并在随访期间获得康复时间和重返工作岗位的时间。分别于术后第1个月、第10个月和第1个月采集疼痛强度。为了描述数据,定性变量采用数量和百分比,定量变量采用均数±标准差。夏皮罗-威尔克检验检验变量的正态性。定量变量的比较采用独立样本t检验。各组疼痛变化比较采用Friedman’s test。两组定性变量比较采用卡方检验。检验的显著性水平为5%,使用的软件为SPSS25。结果:共纳入60例患者,男43例,女17例,平均年龄23.90±6.57岁。伤口感觉异常发生率(P=0.023)、恢复延迟发生率(PP=0.038)。在研究期间,封闭手术组疼痛严重程度降低(P=0.029)。结论:闭式手术比开式手术住院时间短,复工时间短。因此,核dakis皮瓣是治疗毛窦的一种简便易行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Karydakis Flap as a Simple Surgical Method in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease V.S Open Surgery with Average 30-month-follow up: A Clinical Trial.

Karydakis Flap as a Simple Surgical Method in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease V.S Open Surgery with Average 30-month-follow up: A Clinical Trial.

Karydakis Flap as a Simple Surgical Method in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease V.S Open Surgery with Average 30-month-follow up: A Clinical Trial.

Background: Two common types of treatment for pilonidal disease include open and closed surgery. Closed surgery can be done with a Karydakis flap. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of pilonidal sinus management between Karydakis flap and open surgery.

Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on patients diagnosed with pilonidal sinus referred to the surgical clinics of Imam Reza Hospital in Mashhad from 2021 to 2022. Patients were nonrandomly divided into closed and open surgical treatment groups. Demographic information was collected from patients' medical records, the severity of the disease was obtained from operation notes, and time to recovery and time to return to work was obtained during follow-up visits. Pain intensity was collected on the first, tenth, and one month after surgery. To describe the data, the number and percentage for qualitative variables and mean± standard deviation for quantitative variables have been used. Normality of variables investigated by Shapiro-Wilk test. A comparison of quantitative variables was done with an independent sample t-test. The comparison of pain changes within each group was done using Friedman's test. A comparison of qualitative variables in two groups was done with the Chi-Square test. The significance level of the tests is 5%, and the software used is SPSS25.

Results: Sixty patients (43 men and 17 women) with a mean age of 23.90 ± 6.57 years were included. The frequency of wound paresthesia (P=0.023), and recovery delay (P<0.001) was lower in closed surgery compared to the open surgery group, and the frequency of discharge and superficial SSI (Surgical Site Infection) was higher in closed surgery (P=0.038). Pain severity decreased during the study (P=0.029) among the closed surgery group.

Conclusion: Closed surgical treatment was associated with shorter hospitalization time and return to work time than open surgery. Therefore, Karydakis flap can be a simple and acceptable method for the treatment of pilonidal sinus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信