解释医院行政管理人员选择的胜任力-精英混合模型:范围审查。

Q2 Medicine
Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran Pub Date : 2025-01-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.47176/mjiri.39.6
Hossein Dargahi, Mohammad Hossein Ketabchi Khonsari, Mahdi Kooshkebaghi
{"title":"解释医院行政管理人员选择的胜任力-精英混合模型:范围审查。","authors":"Hossein Dargahi, Mohammad Hossein Ketabchi Khonsari, Mahdi Kooshkebaghi","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The successful improvement of health care system (HCS) efficiency in all countries hinges on the selection of effective leaders in the new century. Nevertheless, failing to notice the competency and meritocracy of managers still seems to be one of the major challenges drawn against Iran's HCS, mainly at hospitals, to improve global knowledge and core skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was performed on the articles published on the Persian and English databases from June 2000 to September 2023, using the keywords \"health care system, hospital executive manager, competency and meritocracy system.\" The 6-stage framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley was applied to collect and present the findings. Moreover, the quality of the desired articles was evaluated via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, there are 7 core categories-including effective leadership, comprehensive knowledge management, evidence, managerial tasks, personality traits, management intelligence, and management skills. Using a total of 105 references-including 47 articles for entry into the review and 58 articles added as other sources alongside 95 subcategories associated with the competency and meritocracy of hospital executive managers within the Management Competency Assessment Partnership (MCAP) framework-were extracted through open and deductive coding, and ultimately confirmed. Professionalism was correspondingly supplemented to the given categories based on the MCAP framework, and the final hybrid competency-meritocracy model for the selection of hospital executive managers was proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hybrid competency-meritocracy model proposed in this scoping review can be exploited in the management of new-century hospitals. As the administration of successful hospitals cannot be fulfilled individually, this hybrid model should incorporate all levels of clinical and executive management at hospitals to achieve the desired outcomes by synergizing them with each other. It is suggested to carry out further research on how to establish a competency-meritocracy system in the selection of hospital managers at senior, middle, and operational levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining a Hybrid Competency-Meritocracy Model for Selection of Hospitals Executive Managers: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Dargahi, Mohammad Hossein Ketabchi Khonsari, Mahdi Kooshkebaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/mjiri.39.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The successful improvement of health care system (HCS) efficiency in all countries hinges on the selection of effective leaders in the new century. Nevertheless, failing to notice the competency and meritocracy of managers still seems to be one of the major challenges drawn against Iran's HCS, mainly at hospitals, to improve global knowledge and core skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review was performed on the articles published on the Persian and English databases from June 2000 to September 2023, using the keywords \\\"health care system, hospital executive manager, competency and meritocracy system.\\\" The 6-stage framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley was applied to collect and present the findings. Moreover, the quality of the desired articles was evaluated via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, there are 7 core categories-including effective leadership, comprehensive knowledge management, evidence, managerial tasks, personality traits, management intelligence, and management skills. Using a total of 105 references-including 47 articles for entry into the review and 58 articles added as other sources alongside 95 subcategories associated with the competency and meritocracy of hospital executive managers within the Management Competency Assessment Partnership (MCAP) framework-were extracted through open and deductive coding, and ultimately confirmed. Professionalism was correspondingly supplemented to the given categories based on the MCAP framework, and the final hybrid competency-meritocracy model for the selection of hospital executive managers was proposed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hybrid competency-meritocracy model proposed in this scoping review can be exploited in the management of new-century hospitals. As the administration of successful hospitals cannot be fulfilled individually, this hybrid model should incorporate all levels of clinical and executive management at hospitals to achieve the desired outcomes by synergizing them with each other. It is suggested to carry out further research on how to establish a competency-meritocracy system in the selection of hospital managers at senior, middle, and operational levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138720/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新世纪各国卫生保健系统效率的成功提高取决于有效领导者的选择。然而,未能注意到管理人员的能力和精英管理似乎仍然是伊朗HCS面临的主要挑战之一,主要是在医院,以提高全球知识和核心技能。方法:对2000年6月至2023年9月在波斯语和英语数据库中发表的文章进行范围综述,关键词为“卫生保健系统,医院行政经理,能力和精英制度”。Arksey和O'Malley开发的6阶段框架被用于收集和呈现研究结果。此外,通过混合方法评估工具(MMAT)评估所需文章的质量。结果:本研究包含有效领导、综合知识管理、证据、管理任务、人格特质、管理智力、管理技能7个核心范畴。总共使用了105篇参考文献,其中包括47篇纳入审查的文章和58篇作为其他来源添加的文章,以及管理能力评估伙伴关系(MCAP)框架内与医院执行经理的能力和精英管理相关的95个子类别,通过开放和演绎编码提取,并最终确认。在MCAP框架的基础上,将专业精神相应补充到给定的类别中,并最终提出了医院执行经理选拔的胜任力-精英混合模型。结论:本综述提出的胜任力-精英混合管理模式可应用于新世纪医院管理。由于成功医院的管理不能单独完成,这种混合模式应该将医院的各级临床管理和行政管理结合起来,相互协同,达到预期的效果。建议进一步研究如何在医院高、中、业务管理人员的选拔中建立胜任力-贤能制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Explaining a Hybrid Competency-Meritocracy Model for Selection of Hospitals Executive Managers: A Scoping Review.

Explaining a Hybrid Competency-Meritocracy Model for Selection of Hospitals Executive Managers: A Scoping Review.

Explaining a Hybrid Competency-Meritocracy Model for Selection of Hospitals Executive Managers: A Scoping Review.

Background: The successful improvement of health care system (HCS) efficiency in all countries hinges on the selection of effective leaders in the new century. Nevertheless, failing to notice the competency and meritocracy of managers still seems to be one of the major challenges drawn against Iran's HCS, mainly at hospitals, to improve global knowledge and core skills.

Methods: This scoping review was performed on the articles published on the Persian and English databases from June 2000 to September 2023, using the keywords "health care system, hospital executive manager, competency and meritocracy system." The 6-stage framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley was applied to collect and present the findings. Moreover, the quality of the desired articles was evaluated via the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

Results: In this study, there are 7 core categories-including effective leadership, comprehensive knowledge management, evidence, managerial tasks, personality traits, management intelligence, and management skills. Using a total of 105 references-including 47 articles for entry into the review and 58 articles added as other sources alongside 95 subcategories associated with the competency and meritocracy of hospital executive managers within the Management Competency Assessment Partnership (MCAP) framework-were extracted through open and deductive coding, and ultimately confirmed. Professionalism was correspondingly supplemented to the given categories based on the MCAP framework, and the final hybrid competency-meritocracy model for the selection of hospital executive managers was proposed.

Conclusion: The hybrid competency-meritocracy model proposed in this scoping review can be exploited in the management of new-century hospitals. As the administration of successful hospitals cannot be fulfilled individually, this hybrid model should incorporate all levels of clinical and executive management at hospitals to achieve the desired outcomes by synergizing them with each other. It is suggested to carry out further research on how to establish a competency-meritocracy system in the selection of hospital managers at senior, middle, and operational levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信