Yasser Ahmed Abdelaziz El Kerdasy, Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud, Neazy Abdmokhles Abdelmottaleb, Mahmoud Gaballah Montasser Ali, Mahmoud Helmy Elsaied
{"title":"老年人择期手术后麻醉剂与术后谵妄:七氟醚与异丙酚的回顾性比较。","authors":"Yasser Ahmed Abdelaziz El Kerdasy, Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud, Neazy Abdmokhles Abdelmottaleb, Mahmoud Gaballah Montasser Ali, Mahmoud Helmy Elsaied","doi":"10.47176/mjiri.39.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly subjects is an important health issue as it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Anesthetic agents are associated factors for the development of POD. However, the results of previous studies are heterogeneous. The current work aimed to determine the incidence and associated factors of POD after sevoflurane or propofol general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study, where data were collected from the medical records of 200 subjects scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. One hundred received sevoflurane, and the other 100 received propofol. The collected data included patient characteristics and preoperative and operative data. In addition, POD and any complications developed after surgery are also included. Mean and standard deviation were used to summarize quantitative variables, while frequency and percentages were used to express categorical data. The independent sample's student test was used to compare two means, and Chi-Square was used to calculate associations between categorical parameters. Risk estimate was determined by calculation of odds ratios. <i>P</i> value<0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative time was significantly shorter in sevoflurane than in propofol groups (249.91±45.41 vs 264.60±45.78 minutes, respectively). Otherwise, no significant differences were recorded for preoperative and operative data. The incidence of POD was significantly higher after propofol than sevoflurane (30.0% vs 14.0%). The POD was significantly associated with higher ASA-class physical status, diabetes mellitus, and type of anesthetic agent. ASA-III was 34.1% and 10.3% in patients with delirium than without delirium. Diabetes recorded 65.9% for the group with delirium compared to 10.3% for those without delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POD was higher after propofol than sevoflurane anesthesia. It is associated with ASA physical status, diabetes, and the type of anesthetic agent used.</p>","PeriodicalId":18361,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","volume":"39 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anesthetics and Postoperative Delirium in Elderly after Elective Surgery: A Retrospective Comparison between Sevoflurane and Propofol.\",\"authors\":\"Yasser Ahmed Abdelaziz El Kerdasy, Ibrahim Fadl Mahmoud, Neazy Abdmokhles Abdelmottaleb, Mahmoud Gaballah Montasser Ali, Mahmoud Helmy Elsaied\",\"doi\":\"10.47176/mjiri.39.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly subjects is an important health issue as it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Anesthetic agents are associated factors for the development of POD. However, the results of previous studies are heterogeneous. The current work aimed to determine the incidence and associated factors of POD after sevoflurane or propofol general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study, where data were collected from the medical records of 200 subjects scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. One hundred received sevoflurane, and the other 100 received propofol. The collected data included patient characteristics and preoperative and operative data. In addition, POD and any complications developed after surgery are also included. Mean and standard deviation were used to summarize quantitative variables, while frequency and percentages were used to express categorical data. The independent sample's student test was used to compare two means, and Chi-Square was used to calculate associations between categorical parameters. Risk estimate was determined by calculation of odds ratios. <i>P</i> value<0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative time was significantly shorter in sevoflurane than in propofol groups (249.91±45.41 vs 264.60±45.78 minutes, respectively). Otherwise, no significant differences were recorded for preoperative and operative data. The incidence of POD was significantly higher after propofol than sevoflurane (30.0% vs 14.0%). The POD was significantly associated with higher ASA-class physical status, diabetes mellitus, and type of anesthetic agent. ASA-III was 34.1% and 10.3% in patients with delirium than without delirium. Diabetes recorded 65.9% for the group with delirium compared to 10.3% for those without delirium.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POD was higher after propofol than sevoflurane anesthesia. It is associated with ASA physical status, diabetes, and the type of anesthetic agent used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12138668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.39.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:老年患者术后谵妄(POD)是一个重要的健康问题,因为它与高发病率和死亡率有关。麻醉药物是发生POD的相关因素。然而,以往的研究结果是不一致的。本研究旨在确定七氟醚或异丙酚全身麻醉后POD的发生率及相关因素。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,收集了200例全麻下择期手术患者的病历资料。100人注射了七氟醚,另外100人注射了异丙酚。收集的资料包括患者特征、术前和手术资料。此外,POD和术后并发症也包括在内。用均值和标准差来概括定量变量,用频率和百分比来表示分类数据。采用独立样本学生检验比较两个平均值,采用卡方法计算分类参数之间的相关性。通过计算优势比确定风险估计。结果:七氟醚组手术时间明显短于异丙酚组(249.91±45.41分钟vs 264.60±45.78分钟)。除此之外,术前和手术数据无显著差异。异丙酚的POD发生率明显高于七氟醚(30.0% vs 14.0%)。POD与高asa级身体状况、糖尿病和麻醉药物类型显著相关。谵妄患者ASA-III水平分别为34.1%和10.3%。谵妄组的糖尿病患病率为65.9%,而非谵妄组的糖尿病患病率为10.3%。结论:异丙酚麻醉后POD高于七氟醚麻醉。它与ASA的身体状况、糖尿病和所用麻醉剂的类型有关。
Anesthetics and Postoperative Delirium in Elderly after Elective Surgery: A Retrospective Comparison between Sevoflurane and Propofol.
Background: Postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly subjects is an important health issue as it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Anesthetic agents are associated factors for the development of POD. However, the results of previous studies are heterogeneous. The current work aimed to determine the incidence and associated factors of POD after sevoflurane or propofol general anesthesia.
Methods: This was a retrospective study, where data were collected from the medical records of 200 subjects scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. One hundred received sevoflurane, and the other 100 received propofol. The collected data included patient characteristics and preoperative and operative data. In addition, POD and any complications developed after surgery are also included. Mean and standard deviation were used to summarize quantitative variables, while frequency and percentages were used to express categorical data. The independent sample's student test was used to compare two means, and Chi-Square was used to calculate associations between categorical parameters. Risk estimate was determined by calculation of odds ratios. P value<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in sevoflurane than in propofol groups (249.91±45.41 vs 264.60±45.78 minutes, respectively). Otherwise, no significant differences were recorded for preoperative and operative data. The incidence of POD was significantly higher after propofol than sevoflurane (30.0% vs 14.0%). The POD was significantly associated with higher ASA-class physical status, diabetes mellitus, and type of anesthetic agent. ASA-III was 34.1% and 10.3% in patients with delirium than without delirium. Diabetes recorded 65.9% for the group with delirium compared to 10.3% for those without delirium.
Conclusion: POD was higher after propofol than sevoflurane anesthesia. It is associated with ASA physical status, diabetes, and the type of anesthetic agent used.