量化与年龄相关的前、后角膜散光关系:对人工晶状体计算器和地形引导LASIK方案的见解。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Avi Wallerstein, Allison Bernstein, Mark Cohen, Michael Mimouni, Mathieu Gauvin
{"title":"量化与年龄相关的前、后角膜散光关系:对人工晶状体计算器和地形引导LASIK方案的见解。","authors":"Avi Wallerstein, Allison Bernstein, Mark Cohen, Michael Mimouni, Mathieu Gauvin","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250417-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the age-related interactions between anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) and posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and their impact on total corneal astigmatism (TCA) using a high-resolution topographer in a large cohort of patients of all ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 19,317 eyes seeking refractive surgery was conducted. ACA, PCA, and TCA were measured using the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Corneal data were categorized into astigmatism axes subgroups: with-the-rule (WTR), oblique, and against-the-rule (ATR), and analyzed across 10 age groups. ACA, PCA, and TCA (magnitudes and axes), along with Pearson correlation coefficients between ACA and PCA, were calculated for all groups. Correlations between \"TCA minus ACA\" and selected variables were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACA decreased by 37.6% from 18 to 65 years old, followed by a 9.8% increase after 72 years (<i>P</i> < .001). From 18 to 87 years, PCA consistently decreased by 33.3% with age (<i>P</i> < .001). TCA showed a 28% decrease from ages 18 to 59 years, followed by a 32.3% increase after 72 years (<i>P</i> < .001), which we termed a \"V-shaped\" trend. In WTR ACA eyes, the correlation between ACA and PCA decreased from <i>R</i> = 0.78 at 18 years to R ⩽ 0.48 in eyes 65 years or older. Oblique ACA eyes showed lower correlations, peaking at <i>R</i> = 0.51 at 24 years and decreasing to R = 0.02 after 72 years. ATR ACA eyes showed a mild positive correlation in midlife (<i>R</i> = 0.15; 41 years), switching to a moderate inverse correlation in older age (<i>R</i> = -0.3461; ⩾ 72 years). Higher ACA magnitude, WTR ACA axis, and young age showed strong likelihood of overcorrection if ignoring PCA in laser vision correction (LVC), intraocular lens (IOL), or phakic IOL (PIOL) refractive treatment (<i>P</i> < .0001), whereas lower ACA magnitude, ATR ACA axis, and older age were contrarily more likely to undercorrect if ignoring PCA (<i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACA versus PCA correlations are strongly age-dependent across all orientations. These findings demonstrate that incorporating age-specific correlations into modern IOL calculators could improve TCA prediction accuracy, thereby improving results in refractive IOL surgery. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(6):e520-e531.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 6","pages":"e520-e531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Age-Related Anterior and Posterior Corneal Astigmatism Relationships: Insights for IOL Calculators and Topography-Guided LASIK Protocols.\",\"authors\":\"Avi Wallerstein, Allison Bernstein, Mark Cohen, Michael Mimouni, Mathieu Gauvin\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250417-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the age-related interactions between anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) and posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and their impact on total corneal astigmatism (TCA) using a high-resolution topographer in a large cohort of patients of all ages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 19,317 eyes seeking refractive surgery was conducted. ACA, PCA, and TCA were measured using the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Corneal data were categorized into astigmatism axes subgroups: with-the-rule (WTR), oblique, and against-the-rule (ATR), and analyzed across 10 age groups. ACA, PCA, and TCA (magnitudes and axes), along with Pearson correlation coefficients between ACA and PCA, were calculated for all groups. Correlations between \\\"TCA minus ACA\\\" and selected variables were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACA decreased by 37.6% from 18 to 65 years old, followed by a 9.8% increase after 72 years (<i>P</i> < .001). From 18 to 87 years, PCA consistently decreased by 33.3% with age (<i>P</i> < .001). TCA showed a 28% decrease from ages 18 to 59 years, followed by a 32.3% increase after 72 years (<i>P</i> < .001), which we termed a \\\"V-shaped\\\" trend. In WTR ACA eyes, the correlation between ACA and PCA decreased from <i>R</i> = 0.78 at 18 years to R ⩽ 0.48 in eyes 65 years or older. Oblique ACA eyes showed lower correlations, peaking at <i>R</i> = 0.51 at 24 years and decreasing to R = 0.02 after 72 years. ATR ACA eyes showed a mild positive correlation in midlife (<i>R</i> = 0.15; 41 years), switching to a moderate inverse correlation in older age (<i>R</i> = -0.3461; ⩾ 72 years). Higher ACA magnitude, WTR ACA axis, and young age showed strong likelihood of overcorrection if ignoring PCA in laser vision correction (LVC), intraocular lens (IOL), or phakic IOL (PIOL) refractive treatment (<i>P</i> < .0001), whereas lower ACA magnitude, ATR ACA axis, and older age were contrarily more likely to undercorrect if ignoring PCA (<i>P</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACA versus PCA correlations are strongly age-dependent across all orientations. These findings demonstrate that incorporating age-specific correlations into modern IOL calculators could improve TCA prediction accuracy, thereby improving results in refractive IOL surgery. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(6):e520-e531.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"e520-e531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250417-02\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250417-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用高分辨率地形仪在全年龄段的大队列患者中研究角膜前散光(ACA)和角膜后散光(PCA)之间的年龄相关相互作用及其对角膜总散光(TCA)的影响。方法:对19317只进行屈光手术的眼进行回顾性分析。采用Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH)测量ACA、PCA和TCA。将角膜数据分为顺散轴亚组(WTR)、斜散轴亚组和反散轴亚组(ATR),并对10个年龄组进行分析。计算所有组的ACA、PCA和TCA(大小和轴),以及ACA和PCA之间的Pearson相关系数。还评估了“TCA减去ACA”与选定变量之间的相关性。结果:18 ~ 65岁ACA下降37.6%,72岁后增加9.8% (P < 0.001)。从18岁到87岁,随着年龄的增长,PCA持续下降33.3% (P < 0.001)。从18岁到59岁,TCA下降了28%,72岁后增加了32.3% (P < 0.001),我们称之为“v型”趋势。在WTR ACA眼中,ACA与PCA的相关性从18岁时的R = 0.78下降到65岁及以上眼的R≤0.48。斜斜ACA眼的相关性较低,24岁时R = 0.51达到峰值,72岁后R = 0.02下降。ATR ACA眼在中年呈轻度正相关(R = 0.15;41岁),在老年时转为中度负相关(R = -0.3461;大于或等于72年)。在激光视力矫正(LVC)、人工晶状体(IOL)或有晶状体(PIOL)屈光治疗中,如果忽视PCA,较高的ACA星等、WTR ACA轴和年轻的年龄显示出较强的过矫可能性(P < 0.0001),而相反,较低的ACA星等、ATR ACA轴和年龄较大的人如果忽视PCA,则更容易出现过矫(P < 0.0001)。结论:ACA与PCA的相关性在所有方向上都具有强烈的年龄依赖性。这些发现表明,将年龄相关性纳入现代IOL计算器可以提高TCA预测的准确性,从而改善屈光性IOL手术的结果。[J].中国光学精密工程,2015;41(6):532 - 531。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying Age-Related Anterior and Posterior Corneal Astigmatism Relationships: Insights for IOL Calculators and Topography-Guided LASIK Protocols.

Purpose: To investigate the age-related interactions between anterior corneal astigmatism (ACA) and posterior corneal astigmatism (PCA) and their impact on total corneal astigmatism (TCA) using a high-resolution topographer in a large cohort of patients of all ages.

Methods: A retrospective review of 19,317 eyes seeking refractive surgery was conducted. ACA, PCA, and TCA were measured using the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH). Corneal data were categorized into astigmatism axes subgroups: with-the-rule (WTR), oblique, and against-the-rule (ATR), and analyzed across 10 age groups. ACA, PCA, and TCA (magnitudes and axes), along with Pearson correlation coefficients between ACA and PCA, were calculated for all groups. Correlations between "TCA minus ACA" and selected variables were also assessed.

Results: ACA decreased by 37.6% from 18 to 65 years old, followed by a 9.8% increase after 72 years (P < .001). From 18 to 87 years, PCA consistently decreased by 33.3% with age (P < .001). TCA showed a 28% decrease from ages 18 to 59 years, followed by a 32.3% increase after 72 years (P < .001), which we termed a "V-shaped" trend. In WTR ACA eyes, the correlation between ACA and PCA decreased from R = 0.78 at 18 years to R ⩽ 0.48 in eyes 65 years or older. Oblique ACA eyes showed lower correlations, peaking at R = 0.51 at 24 years and decreasing to R = 0.02 after 72 years. ATR ACA eyes showed a mild positive correlation in midlife (R = 0.15; 41 years), switching to a moderate inverse correlation in older age (R = -0.3461; ⩾ 72 years). Higher ACA magnitude, WTR ACA axis, and young age showed strong likelihood of overcorrection if ignoring PCA in laser vision correction (LVC), intraocular lens (IOL), or phakic IOL (PIOL) refractive treatment (P < .0001), whereas lower ACA magnitude, ATR ACA axis, and older age were contrarily more likely to undercorrect if ignoring PCA (P < .0001).

Conclusions: ACA versus PCA correlations are strongly age-dependent across all orientations. These findings demonstrate that incorporating age-specific correlations into modern IOL calculators could improve TCA prediction accuracy, thereby improving results in refractive IOL surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(6):e520-e531.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信