局灶性立体定向磁共振引导激光间质热治疗小儿局灶性癫痫后切除性癫痫手术的疗效:一个病例系列。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stephen Jaffee, Madison Remick, Oliver Y Tang, Emily E Harford, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Ruba Al-Ramadhani, William P Welch, Taylor J Abel
{"title":"局灶性立体定向磁共振引导激光间质热治疗小儿局灶性癫痫后切除性癫痫手术的疗效:一个病例系列。","authors":"Stephen Jaffee, Madison Remick, Oliver Y Tang, Emily E Harford, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Ruba Al-Ramadhani, William P Welch, Taylor J Abel","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.PEDS24485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open resective epilepsy surgery for the ablation of seizure foci. This technique has become attractive to patients, caregivers, and epilepsy teams because it enables ablation of the seizure focus while avoiding craniotomy-specific complications of epilepsy surgery. For some indications, evidence suggests that MRgLITT is less effective than open surgery for achieving seizure control. However, open surgery after MRgLITT may be technically challenging or associated with higher complication rates due to the scar tissue generated by MRgLITT. Therefore, the authors investigated the indications and outcomes of open surgery after MRgLITT in a series of 7 pediatric epilepsy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent MRgLITT surgery followed by resective surgery for an epilepsy focus between 2019 and 2024 at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected for each patient, including seizure focus, baseline seizure burden and semiology, age at surgery, operative time, complications, and seizure outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRgLITT was successful in initially reducing seizure burden in 6 of 7 patients; however, return of seizure-like activity or aura phenomenon was the indication for open resection at an average of 23.29 months post-MRgLITT. Three patients required a second resective surgery due to persistent seizures. One year following the last open resection, 5 (71.4%) patients had attained International League Against Epilepsy class 1. Additionally, 4 of 7 patients had a significant reduction in antiseizure medications. Minimal complications were observed for both MRgLITT and open resective surgery in this case series.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this case series, open resection after MRgLITT was observed to be a safe and effective method of surgical treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy after preliminary MRgLITT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of resective epilepsy surgery after focal stereotactic MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for pediatric focal epilepsy: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Jaffee, Madison Remick, Oliver Y Tang, Emily E Harford, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez, Ruba Al-Ramadhani, William P Welch, Taylor J Abel\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.2.PEDS24485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open resective epilepsy surgery for the ablation of seizure foci. This technique has become attractive to patients, caregivers, and epilepsy teams because it enables ablation of the seizure focus while avoiding craniotomy-specific complications of epilepsy surgery. For some indications, evidence suggests that MRgLITT is less effective than open surgery for achieving seizure control. However, open surgery after MRgLITT may be technically challenging or associated with higher complication rates due to the scar tissue generated by MRgLITT. Therefore, the authors investigated the indications and outcomes of open surgery after MRgLITT in a series of 7 pediatric epilepsy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent MRgLITT surgery followed by resective surgery for an epilepsy focus between 2019 and 2024 at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected for each patient, including seizure focus, baseline seizure burden and semiology, age at surgery, operative time, complications, and seizure outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRgLITT was successful in initially reducing seizure burden in 6 of 7 patients; however, return of seizure-like activity or aura phenomenon was the indication for open resection at an average of 23.29 months post-MRgLITT. Three patients required a second resective surgery due to persistent seizures. One year following the last open resection, 5 (71.4%) patients had attained International League Against Epilepsy class 1. Additionally, 4 of 7 patients had a significant reduction in antiseizure medications. Minimal complications were observed for both MRgLITT and open resective surgery in this case series.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this case series, open resection after MRgLITT was observed to be a safe and effective method of surgical treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy after preliminary MRgLITT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.PEDS24485\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.PEDS24485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:磁共振引导的激光间质热疗法(MRgLITT)已成为一种微创替代开放式切除性癫痫手术治疗癫痫发作病灶的方法。这项技术对患者、护理人员和癫痫团队都很有吸引力,因为它可以消融癫痫发作病灶,同时避免癫痫手术开颅特有的并发症。对于某些适应症,有证据表明MRgLITT在控制癫痫发作方面不如开放手术有效。然而,MRgLITT后的开放手术可能在技术上具有挑战性,或者由于MRgLITT产生的疤痕组织而导致更高的并发症发生率。因此,作者研究了7例儿童癫痫患者MRgLITT后开放手术的适应症和结果。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2024年在匹兹堡UPMC儿童医院接受MRgLITT手术后切除癫痫病灶的患者。随访少于1年的患者被排除在外。收集每位患者的人口学、临床和手术特征,包括癫痫发作病灶、基线癫痫发作负担和符号学、手术年龄、手术时间、并发症和癫痫发作结果。结果:MRgLITT在7例患者中成功减轻了6例癫痫发作负担;然而,在mrglitt后平均23.29个月,癫痫样活动或先兆现象的恢复是开放切除的指征。三名患者因持续发作需要进行第二次切除手术。最后一次开放切除一年后,5例(71.4%)患者达到国际抗癫痫联盟1级。此外,7名患者中有4名抗癫痫药物显著减少。在这个病例系列中,MRgLITT和开放切除手术的并发症都很小。结论:在本病例系列中,MRgLITT后开放切除是一种安全有效的手术治疗初期MRgLITT后难治性癫痫患者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of resective epilepsy surgery after focal stereotactic MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for pediatric focal epilepsy: a case series.

Objective: MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to open resective epilepsy surgery for the ablation of seizure foci. This technique has become attractive to patients, caregivers, and epilepsy teams because it enables ablation of the seizure focus while avoiding craniotomy-specific complications of epilepsy surgery. For some indications, evidence suggests that MRgLITT is less effective than open surgery for achieving seizure control. However, open surgery after MRgLITT may be technically challenging or associated with higher complication rates due to the scar tissue generated by MRgLITT. Therefore, the authors investigated the indications and outcomes of open surgery after MRgLITT in a series of 7 pediatric epilepsy patients.

Methods: Patients who underwent MRgLITT surgery followed by resective surgery for an epilepsy focus between 2019 and 2024 at UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh were included in a retrospective analysis. Patients with less than 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected for each patient, including seizure focus, baseline seizure burden and semiology, age at surgery, operative time, complications, and seizure outcomes.

Results: MRgLITT was successful in initially reducing seizure burden in 6 of 7 patients; however, return of seizure-like activity or aura phenomenon was the indication for open resection at an average of 23.29 months post-MRgLITT. Three patients required a second resective surgery due to persistent seizures. One year following the last open resection, 5 (71.4%) patients had attained International League Against Epilepsy class 1. Additionally, 4 of 7 patients had a significant reduction in antiseizure medications. Minimal complications were observed for both MRgLITT and open resective surgery in this case series.

Conclusions: In this case series, open resection after MRgLITT was observed to be a safe and effective method of surgical treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy after preliminary MRgLITT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信