用嗅棒试验评价温室工人变应性鼻炎的嗅觉功能。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Mustafa Altintaş, Murat Kar, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Cemal Cingi
{"title":"用嗅棒试验评价温室工人变应性鼻炎的嗅觉功能。","authors":"Mustafa Altintaş, Murat Kar, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Cemal Cingi","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors assessed olfactory perceptual ability in greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis (AR) using the Sniffin' Sticks test battery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study group (group 1) was formed from 51 greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis (AR) (group 1) in the Antalya Province of Turkey. The control group (group 2) was formed from 49 healthy volunteers. The olfactory perception was assessed for each subject enrolled in the trial utilizing the Sniffin' Sticks' odorous felt-tipped pens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between the scores obtained for pen 6 and pen 12, which the study group could not correctly identify (P<0.05). Overall, the score for the groups was also significantly different, with the study group (group 1) having a lower olfactory perceptual ability (9.39±2.87) than the control group (10.4±2.19) (P<0.05). Within the study group (group 1), men and women did not differ in total scores (P=0.791). The authors noted that 19.6% of the study group was anosmic, compared with 10.2% in the controls. 27.5% of the study group were hyposmic, and 52.9% were normosmic. In the control group, 22.4% were hyposmic, and 67.3% were normosmic (P=0.274, χ2=2.588).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, a decrease in total odor score was detected in greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis, and this decrease did not correlate with working duration. Gases and pesticides encountered in greenhouse areas may also affect this olfactory decrease. Smoking also affected the total odor scores as they decreased. The use of protective masks and clothes may play a preventive role.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Olfactory Function in Greenhouse Workers With Allergic Rhinitis Assessed by Sniffin' Sticks Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Altintaş, Murat Kar, Nuray Bayar Muluk, Cemal Cingi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors assessed olfactory perceptual ability in greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis (AR) using the Sniffin' Sticks test battery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study group (group 1) was formed from 51 greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis (AR) (group 1) in the Antalya Province of Turkey. The control group (group 2) was formed from 49 healthy volunteers. The olfactory perception was assessed for each subject enrolled in the trial utilizing the Sniffin' Sticks' odorous felt-tipped pens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences between the scores obtained for pen 6 and pen 12, which the study group could not correctly identify (P<0.05). Overall, the score for the groups was also significantly different, with the study group (group 1) having a lower olfactory perceptual ability (9.39±2.87) than the control group (10.4±2.19) (P<0.05). Within the study group (group 1), men and women did not differ in total scores (P=0.791). The authors noted that 19.6% of the study group was anosmic, compared with 10.2% in the controls. 27.5% of the study group were hyposmic, and 52.9% were normosmic. In the control group, 22.4% were hyposmic, and 67.3% were normosmic (P=0.274, χ2=2.588).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, a decrease in total odor score was detected in greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis, and this decrease did not correlate with working duration. Gases and pesticides encountered in greenhouse areas may also affect this olfactory decrease. Smoking also affected the total odor scores as they decreased. The use of protective masks and clothes may play a preventive role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011547\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用嗅探棒测试方法评估温室工人变应性鼻炎(AR)的嗅觉知觉能力。方法:选取土耳其安塔利亚省51例变应性鼻炎(AR)温室工人(1组)为研究对象。对照组(第二组)由49名健康志愿者组成。使用嗅探棒(Sniffin' Sticks)气味毡尖笔对每个参加试验的受试者的嗅觉进行了评估。结果:研究组无法正确识别出6号和12号工位的总气味得分有显著差异(p结论:在我们的研究中,变应性鼻炎温室工人的总气味得分下降,而且这种下降与工作时间无关。温室地区遇到的气体和杀虫剂也可能影响这种嗅觉下降。吸烟也会影响总气味分数的下降。使用防护口罩和防护服可以起到预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Olfactory Function in Greenhouse Workers With Allergic Rhinitis Assessed by Sniffin' Sticks Testing.

Objectives: The authors assessed olfactory perceptual ability in greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis (AR) using the Sniffin' Sticks test battery.

Methods: The study group (group 1) was formed from 51 greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis (AR) (group 1) in the Antalya Province of Turkey. The control group (group 2) was formed from 49 healthy volunteers. The olfactory perception was assessed for each subject enrolled in the trial utilizing the Sniffin' Sticks' odorous felt-tipped pens.

Results: There were significant differences between the scores obtained for pen 6 and pen 12, which the study group could not correctly identify (P<0.05). Overall, the score for the groups was also significantly different, with the study group (group 1) having a lower olfactory perceptual ability (9.39±2.87) than the control group (10.4±2.19) (P<0.05). Within the study group (group 1), men and women did not differ in total scores (P=0.791). The authors noted that 19.6% of the study group was anosmic, compared with 10.2% in the controls. 27.5% of the study group were hyposmic, and 52.9% were normosmic. In the control group, 22.4% were hyposmic, and 67.3% were normosmic (P=0.274, χ2=2.588).

Conclusion: In our study, a decrease in total odor score was detected in greenhouse workers with allergic rhinitis, and this decrease did not correlate with working duration. Gases and pesticides encountered in greenhouse areas may also affect this olfactory decrease. Smoking also affected the total odor scores as they decreased. The use of protective masks and clothes may play a preventive role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信