Mustafa Borga Dönmez , Gabriel Willauer , Münir Demirel , Çiğdem Kahveci , Burak Yilmaz
{"title":"多层和树脂类型对齿状铸件尺寸稳定性的影响。","authors":"Mustafa Borga Dönmez , Gabriel Willauer , Münir Demirel , Çiğdem Kahveci , Burak Yilmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effects of multi-stacking and resin type on the dimensional stability of additively manufactured (AM) dentate casts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A master maxillary dentate model file was used to AM casts in a multi-stacked manner, consisting of four layers (L1–L4), using two different resins (DentaMODEL [DM] and KeyModel Ultra Ivory [KM], <em>n</em> = 10). Each cast was digitized one day, one week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks, and three months after fabrication (T0–T5). The scan files were superimposed over the master file to evaluate the dimensional stability of the casts (anterior, posterior, and entire arch) using the root mean square method. Data were analyzed with a generalized linear model (α = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>KM casts had their highest anterior and entire arch deviations when printed at L4 (<em>P</em> < 0.001). DM casts mostly had lower deviations than KM casts across tested layers and storage durations (<em>P</em> < 0.001). DM casts showed the highest anterior deviations at T1 and T2, while KM casts showed the highest at T0, T3, and T4 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.009). Casts printed at L4 showed the highest anterior deviations at T0 and greater deviations than L1 at T3 and T5, regardless of resin (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.044). KM casts had lower entire arch deviations at T5 than at T3 (<em>P</em> = 0.027).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the differences due to stacking were minimal and clinically negligible, the DM casts mostly had higher stability. All casts remained within clinically acceptable limits over three months.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Significance</h3><div>Multi-stacking during printing may be an efficient method for large-scale of plateless dentate casts with clinically acceptable dimensional stability for diagnostic and orthodontic use over three months, when tested resins and three-dimensional printer are used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 105871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of multi-stacking and resin type on dimensional stability of dentate casts\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Borga Dönmez , Gabriel Willauer , Münir Demirel , Çiğdem Kahveci , Burak Yilmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effects of multi-stacking and resin type on the dimensional stability of additively manufactured (AM) dentate casts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A master maxillary dentate model file was used to AM casts in a multi-stacked manner, consisting of four layers (L1–L4), using two different resins (DentaMODEL [DM] and KeyModel Ultra Ivory [KM], <em>n</em> = 10). Each cast was digitized one day, one week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks, and three months after fabrication (T0–T5). The scan files were superimposed over the master file to evaluate the dimensional stability of the casts (anterior, posterior, and entire arch) using the root mean square method. Data were analyzed with a generalized linear model (α = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>KM casts had their highest anterior and entire arch deviations when printed at L4 (<em>P</em> < 0.001). DM casts mostly had lower deviations than KM casts across tested layers and storage durations (<em>P</em> < 0.001). DM casts showed the highest anterior deviations at T1 and T2, while KM casts showed the highest at T0, T3, and T4 (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.009). Casts printed at L4 showed the highest anterior deviations at T0 and greater deviations than L1 at T3 and T5, regardless of resin (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.044). KM casts had lower entire arch deviations at T5 than at T3 (<em>P</em> = 0.027).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While the differences due to stacking were minimal and clinically negligible, the DM casts mostly had higher stability. All casts remained within clinically acceptable limits over three months.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Significance</h3><div>Multi-stacking during printing may be an efficient method for large-scale of plateless dentate casts with clinically acceptable dimensional stability for diagnostic and orthodontic use over three months, when tested resins and three-dimensional printer are used.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122500315X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030057122500315X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of multi-stacking and resin type on dimensional stability of dentate casts
Objective
To evaluate the effects of multi-stacking and resin type on the dimensional stability of additively manufactured (AM) dentate casts.
Methods
A master maxillary dentate model file was used to AM casts in a multi-stacked manner, consisting of four layers (L1–L4), using two different resins (DentaMODEL [DM] and KeyModel Ultra Ivory [KM], n = 10). Each cast was digitized one day, one week, two weeks, three weeks, four weeks, and three months after fabrication (T0–T5). The scan files were superimposed over the master file to evaluate the dimensional stability of the casts (anterior, posterior, and entire arch) using the root mean square method. Data were analyzed with a generalized linear model (α = 0.05).
Results
KM casts had their highest anterior and entire arch deviations when printed at L4 (P < 0.001). DM casts mostly had lower deviations than KM casts across tested layers and storage durations (P < 0.001). DM casts showed the highest anterior deviations at T1 and T2, while KM casts showed the highest at T0, T3, and T4 (P ≤ 0.009). Casts printed at L4 showed the highest anterior deviations at T0 and greater deviations than L1 at T3 and T5, regardless of resin (P ≤ 0.044). KM casts had lower entire arch deviations at T5 than at T3 (P = 0.027).
Conclusions
While the differences due to stacking were minimal and clinically negligible, the DM casts mostly had higher stability. All casts remained within clinically acceptable limits over three months.
Clinical Significance
Multi-stacking during printing may be an efficient method for large-scale of plateless dentate casts with clinically acceptable dimensional stability for diagnostic and orthodontic use over three months, when tested resins and three-dimensional printer are used.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.