预测烧伤后住院康复时间的因素:烧伤模型系统研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Vanessa Dellheim, Audrey M O'Neil, Lori Connolly, Lauren J Shepler, Kara A McMullen, Lewis E Kazis, Karen Kowalske, Oscar E Suman-Vejas, Caitlin Orton, Barclay T Stewart, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider
{"title":"预测烧伤后住院康复时间的因素:烧伤模型系统研究。","authors":"Vanessa Dellheim, Audrey M O'Neil, Lori Connolly, Lauren J Shepler, Kara A McMullen, Lewis E Kazis, Karen Kowalske, Oscar E Suman-Vejas, Caitlin Orton, Barclay T Stewart, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rehabilitation services often improve the functional recovery of people who have experienced burn injuries. However, characteristics associated with longer inpatient rehabilitation (IR) stays have not been well explored. This study aimed to examine patient and clinical factors associated with the length of IR stay. Adult participants in the Burn Model System National Database (1994-2022) discharged to IR following their hospital stay were included. A negative binomial regression analysis examined the association between IR days and demographic and injury characteristics. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study included 585 participants who were 72% male with mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.8), and mean burn size of 34.6% (20.5) total body surface area (TBSA). Average IR days were 22.8 (19.3). Characteristics associated with more IR days include TBSA (p-value <0.001), ventilator days (p-value <0.001), high- voltage electrical injury (p-value 0.021), ROM deficits (p-value 0.049), foot burns (0.008), and self-inflicted injury (p-value =0.002). Hand burns (p-value 0.008) and self-pay/philanthropy/other primary payor source (p-value <0.001) were the only factors in this study associated with less IR days. Study results demonstrate significant links between burn injury complexity factors and IR stay. Understanding how these factors affect length of IR stay post-burn injury will better help to inform rehabilitation care decisions. Results provide future opportunities for examination of anticipated IR LOS and factors guiding additional rehabilitation resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination of Factors Predicting Inpatient Rehabilitation Stay After Burn Injury: A Burns Model System Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Dellheim, Audrey M O'Neil, Lori Connolly, Lauren J Shepler, Kara A McMullen, Lewis E Kazis, Karen Kowalske, Oscar E Suman-Vejas, Caitlin Orton, Barclay T Stewart, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rehabilitation services often improve the functional recovery of people who have experienced burn injuries. However, characteristics associated with longer inpatient rehabilitation (IR) stays have not been well explored. This study aimed to examine patient and clinical factors associated with the length of IR stay. Adult participants in the Burn Model System National Database (1994-2022) discharged to IR following their hospital stay were included. A negative binomial regression analysis examined the association between IR days and demographic and injury characteristics. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study included 585 participants who were 72% male with mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.8), and mean burn size of 34.6% (20.5) total body surface area (TBSA). Average IR days were 22.8 (19.3). Characteristics associated with more IR days include TBSA (p-value <0.001), ventilator days (p-value <0.001), high- voltage electrical injury (p-value 0.021), ROM deficits (p-value 0.049), foot burns (0.008), and self-inflicted injury (p-value =0.002). Hand burns (p-value 0.008) and self-pay/philanthropy/other primary payor source (p-value <0.001) were the only factors in this study associated with less IR days. Study results demonstrate significant links between burn injury complexity factors and IR stay. Understanding how these factors affect length of IR stay post-burn injury will better help to inform rehabilitation care decisions. Results provide future opportunities for examination of anticipated IR LOS and factors guiding additional rehabilitation resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

康复服务经常改善经历过烧伤的人的功能恢复。然而,与长期住院康复(IR)相关的特征尚未得到很好的探讨。本研究旨在检查与IR住院时间相关的患者和临床因素。纳入烧伤模型系统国家数据库(1994-2022)住院后出院至IR的成人参与者。负二项回归分析检验了IR天数与人口统计学和损伤特征之间的关系。p值小于0.05被认为是显著的。该研究包括585名参与者,其中72%为男性,平均年龄为46.1岁(SD 16.8),平均烧伤面积为34.6%(20.5)。平均IR天数22.8天(19.3天)。与较多IR天数相关的特征包括TBSA (p值)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Examination of Factors Predicting Inpatient Rehabilitation Stay After Burn Injury: A Burns Model System Study.

Rehabilitation services often improve the functional recovery of people who have experienced burn injuries. However, characteristics associated with longer inpatient rehabilitation (IR) stays have not been well explored. This study aimed to examine patient and clinical factors associated with the length of IR stay. Adult participants in the Burn Model System National Database (1994-2022) discharged to IR following their hospital stay were included. A negative binomial regression analysis examined the association between IR days and demographic and injury characteristics. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study included 585 participants who were 72% male with mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.8), and mean burn size of 34.6% (20.5) total body surface area (TBSA). Average IR days were 22.8 (19.3). Characteristics associated with more IR days include TBSA (p-value <0.001), ventilator days (p-value <0.001), high- voltage electrical injury (p-value 0.021), ROM deficits (p-value 0.049), foot burns (0.008), and self-inflicted injury (p-value =0.002). Hand burns (p-value 0.008) and self-pay/philanthropy/other primary payor source (p-value <0.001) were the only factors in this study associated with less IR days. Study results demonstrate significant links between burn injury complexity factors and IR stay. Understanding how these factors affect length of IR stay post-burn injury will better help to inform rehabilitation care decisions. Results provide future opportunities for examination of anticipated IR LOS and factors guiding additional rehabilitation resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信