Vanessa Dellheim, Audrey M O'Neil, Lori Connolly, Lauren J Shepler, Kara A McMullen, Lewis E Kazis, Karen Kowalske, Oscar E Suman-Vejas, Caitlin Orton, Barclay T Stewart, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider
{"title":"预测烧伤后住院康复时间的因素:烧伤模型系统研究。","authors":"Vanessa Dellheim, Audrey M O'Neil, Lori Connolly, Lauren J Shepler, Kara A McMullen, Lewis E Kazis, Karen Kowalske, Oscar E Suman-Vejas, Caitlin Orton, Barclay T Stewart, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rehabilitation services often improve the functional recovery of people who have experienced burn injuries. However, characteristics associated with longer inpatient rehabilitation (IR) stays have not been well explored. This study aimed to examine patient and clinical factors associated with the length of IR stay. Adult participants in the Burn Model System National Database (1994-2022) discharged to IR following their hospital stay were included. A negative binomial regression analysis examined the association between IR days and demographic and injury characteristics. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study included 585 participants who were 72% male with mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.8), and mean burn size of 34.6% (20.5) total body surface area (TBSA). Average IR days were 22.8 (19.3). Characteristics associated with more IR days include TBSA (p-value <0.001), ventilator days (p-value <0.001), high- voltage electrical injury (p-value 0.021), ROM deficits (p-value 0.049), foot burns (0.008), and self-inflicted injury (p-value =0.002). Hand burns (p-value 0.008) and self-pay/philanthropy/other primary payor source (p-value <0.001) were the only factors in this study associated with less IR days. Study results demonstrate significant links between burn injury complexity factors and IR stay. Understanding how these factors affect length of IR stay post-burn injury will better help to inform rehabilitation care decisions. Results provide future opportunities for examination of anticipated IR LOS and factors guiding additional rehabilitation resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination of Factors Predicting Inpatient Rehabilitation Stay After Burn Injury: A Burns Model System Study.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa Dellheim, Audrey M O'Neil, Lori Connolly, Lauren J Shepler, Kara A McMullen, Lewis E Kazis, Karen Kowalske, Oscar E Suman-Vejas, Caitlin Orton, Barclay T Stewart, Colleen M Ryan, Jeffrey C Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rehabilitation services often improve the functional recovery of people who have experienced burn injuries. However, characteristics associated with longer inpatient rehabilitation (IR) stays have not been well explored. This study aimed to examine patient and clinical factors associated with the length of IR stay. Adult participants in the Burn Model System National Database (1994-2022) discharged to IR following their hospital stay were included. A negative binomial regression analysis examined the association between IR days and demographic and injury characteristics. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study included 585 participants who were 72% male with mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.8), and mean burn size of 34.6% (20.5) total body surface area (TBSA). Average IR days were 22.8 (19.3). Characteristics associated with more IR days include TBSA (p-value <0.001), ventilator days (p-value <0.001), high- voltage electrical injury (p-value 0.021), ROM deficits (p-value 0.049), foot burns (0.008), and self-inflicted injury (p-value =0.002). Hand burns (p-value 0.008) and self-pay/philanthropy/other primary payor source (p-value <0.001) were the only factors in this study associated with less IR days. Study results demonstrate significant links between burn injury complexity factors and IR stay. Understanding how these factors affect length of IR stay post-burn injury will better help to inform rehabilitation care decisions. Results provide future opportunities for examination of anticipated IR LOS and factors guiding additional rehabilitation resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf108\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Examination of Factors Predicting Inpatient Rehabilitation Stay After Burn Injury: A Burns Model System Study.
Rehabilitation services often improve the functional recovery of people who have experienced burn injuries. However, characteristics associated with longer inpatient rehabilitation (IR) stays have not been well explored. This study aimed to examine patient and clinical factors associated with the length of IR stay. Adult participants in the Burn Model System National Database (1994-2022) discharged to IR following their hospital stay were included. A negative binomial regression analysis examined the association between IR days and demographic and injury characteristics. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The study included 585 participants who were 72% male with mean age of 46.1 years (SD 16.8), and mean burn size of 34.6% (20.5) total body surface area (TBSA). Average IR days were 22.8 (19.3). Characteristics associated with more IR days include TBSA (p-value <0.001), ventilator days (p-value <0.001), high- voltage electrical injury (p-value 0.021), ROM deficits (p-value 0.049), foot burns (0.008), and self-inflicted injury (p-value =0.002). Hand burns (p-value 0.008) and self-pay/philanthropy/other primary payor source (p-value <0.001) were the only factors in this study associated with less IR days. Study results demonstrate significant links between burn injury complexity factors and IR stay. Understanding how these factors affect length of IR stay post-burn injury will better help to inform rehabilitation care decisions. Results provide future opportunities for examination of anticipated IR LOS and factors guiding additional rehabilitation resources.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.