Marlene Prager, Felix Bergmann, Lena Pracher, Dragan Copic, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Georg Gelbenegger, Heimo Lagler, Nicole Harrison, Heinz Burgmann, Markus Zeitlinger, Anselm Jorda
{"title":"菌血症患者抗菌治疗7天vs 14天:随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Marlene Prager, Felix Bergmann, Lena Pracher, Dragan Copic, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Georg Gelbenegger, Heimo Lagler, Nicole Harrison, Heinz Burgmann, Markus Zeitlinger, Anselm Jorda","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia is a matter of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared 7 days with 14 days of antimicrobial treatment in adults with bacteremia. The systematic search included trials published until December 2024. Efficacy outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, recurrence of bacteremia and mean length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash or emergence of antibiotic resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included four randomized controlled trials with a total of 4790 participants. Death by day 90 occurred in 321 (13.3%) of 2406 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 7 days and 342 (14.3%) of 2384 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 14 days (RR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07)]; p = 0.30; prediction interval 0.74 to 1.17). The mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (mean difference - 0.18 days [95% CI, -1.03 to 0.67]; p = 0.69; prediction interval - 2.57 to 2.22). Recurrence of bacteremia was similar between antibiotic treatment for 7 days (64 [2.7%] of 2406) and antibiotic treatment for 14 days (56 [2.3%] of 2384) (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.63)]; p = 0.47; prediction interval 0.64 to 2.03). Safety outcomes, including the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash, and antibiotic resistance, were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that 7-day and 14-day antimicrobial treatment is associated with a similar efficacy and safety profile in patients with bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial treatment for 7 versus 14 days in patients with bacteremia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Marlene Prager, Felix Bergmann, Lena Pracher, Dragan Copic, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Georg Gelbenegger, Heimo Lagler, Nicole Harrison, Heinz Burgmann, Markus Zeitlinger, Anselm Jorda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia is a matter of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared 7 days with 14 days of antimicrobial treatment in adults with bacteremia. The systematic search included trials published until December 2024. Efficacy outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, recurrence of bacteremia and mean length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash or emergence of antibiotic resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included four randomized controlled trials with a total of 4790 participants. Death by day 90 occurred in 321 (13.3%) of 2406 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 7 days and 342 (14.3%) of 2384 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 14 days (RR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07)]; p = 0.30; prediction interval 0.74 to 1.17). The mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (mean difference - 0.18 days [95% CI, -1.03 to 0.67]; p = 0.69; prediction interval - 2.57 to 2.22). Recurrence of bacteremia was similar between antibiotic treatment for 7 days (64 [2.7%] of 2406) and antibiotic treatment for 14 days (56 [2.3%] of 2384) (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.63)]; p = 0.47; prediction interval 0.64 to 2.03). Safety outcomes, including the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash, and antibiotic resistance, were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that 7-day and 14-day antimicrobial treatment is associated with a similar efficacy and safety profile in patients with bacteremia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antimicrobial treatment for 7 versus 14 days in patients with bacteremia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Purpose: The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia is a matter of ongoing debate.
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared 7 days with 14 days of antimicrobial treatment in adults with bacteremia. The systematic search included trials published until December 2024. Efficacy outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, recurrence of bacteremia and mean length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash or emergence of antibiotic resistance.
Results: The final analysis included four randomized controlled trials with a total of 4790 participants. Death by day 90 occurred in 321 (13.3%) of 2406 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 7 days and 342 (14.3%) of 2384 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 14 days (RR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07)]; p = 0.30; prediction interval 0.74 to 1.17). The mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (mean difference - 0.18 days [95% CI, -1.03 to 0.67]; p = 0.69; prediction interval - 2.57 to 2.22). Recurrence of bacteremia was similar between antibiotic treatment for 7 days (64 [2.7%] of 2406) and antibiotic treatment for 14 days (56 [2.3%] of 2384) (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.63)]; p = 0.47; prediction interval 0.64 to 2.03). Safety outcomes, including the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash, and antibiotic resistance, were similar between groups.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that 7-day and 14-day antimicrobial treatment is associated with a similar efficacy and safety profile in patients with bacteremia.
期刊介绍:
Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings.
The journal covers a wide range of topics, including:
Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases.
Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease.
Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases.
Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases.
Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies.
Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections.
In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.