菌血症患者抗菌治疗7天vs 14天:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Marlene Prager, Felix Bergmann, Lena Pracher, Dragan Copic, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Georg Gelbenegger, Heimo Lagler, Nicole Harrison, Heinz Burgmann, Markus Zeitlinger, Anselm Jorda
{"title":"菌血症患者抗菌治疗7天vs 14天:随机对照试验的荟萃分析","authors":"Marlene Prager, Felix Bergmann, Lena Pracher, Dragan Copic, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Georg Gelbenegger, Heimo Lagler, Nicole Harrison, Heinz Burgmann, Markus Zeitlinger, Anselm Jorda","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia is a matter of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared 7 days with 14 days of antimicrobial treatment in adults with bacteremia. The systematic search included trials published until December 2024. Efficacy outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, recurrence of bacteremia and mean length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash or emergence of antibiotic resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included four randomized controlled trials with a total of 4790 participants. Death by day 90 occurred in 321 (13.3%) of 2406 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 7 days and 342 (14.3%) of 2384 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 14 days (RR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07)]; p = 0.30; prediction interval 0.74 to 1.17). The mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (mean difference - 0.18 days [95% CI, -1.03 to 0.67]; p = 0.69; prediction interval - 2.57 to 2.22). Recurrence of bacteremia was similar between antibiotic treatment for 7 days (64 [2.7%] of 2406) and antibiotic treatment for 14 days (56 [2.3%] of 2384) (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.63)]; p = 0.47; prediction interval 0.64 to 2.03). Safety outcomes, including the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash, and antibiotic resistance, were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that 7-day and 14-day antimicrobial treatment is associated with a similar efficacy and safety profile in patients with bacteremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial treatment for 7 versus 14 days in patients with bacteremia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Marlene Prager, Felix Bergmann, Lena Pracher, Dragan Copic, Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg, Georg Gelbenegger, Heimo Lagler, Nicole Harrison, Heinz Burgmann, Markus Zeitlinger, Anselm Jorda\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia is a matter of ongoing debate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared 7 days with 14 days of antimicrobial treatment in adults with bacteremia. The systematic search included trials published until December 2024. Efficacy outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, recurrence of bacteremia and mean length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash or emergence of antibiotic resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included four randomized controlled trials with a total of 4790 participants. Death by day 90 occurred in 321 (13.3%) of 2406 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 7 days and 342 (14.3%) of 2384 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 14 days (RR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07)]; p = 0.30; prediction interval 0.74 to 1.17). The mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (mean difference - 0.18 days [95% CI, -1.03 to 0.67]; p = 0.69; prediction interval - 2.57 to 2.22). Recurrence of bacteremia was similar between antibiotic treatment for 7 days (64 [2.7%] of 2406) and antibiotic treatment for 14 days (56 [2.3%] of 2384) (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.63)]; p = 0.47; prediction interval 0.64 to 2.03). Safety outcomes, including the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash, and antibiotic resistance, were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that 7-day and 14-day antimicrobial treatment is associated with a similar efficacy and safety profile in patients with bacteremia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02562-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:菌血症患者抗生素治疗的最佳持续时间是一个持续争论的问题。方法:我们进行了一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,比较了7天和14天的成人菌血症抗菌药物治疗。系统检索包括2024年12月之前发表的试验。疗效指标包括90天全因死亡率、菌血症复发率和平均住院时间。安全性指标包括不良事件总数、艰难梭菌感染、腹泻、急性肾损伤、皮疹或抗生素耐药性的出现。结果:最终分析包括4个随机对照试验,共4790名参与者。2406例接受抗生素治疗7天的患者中有321例(13.3%)在第90天死亡,2384例接受抗生素治疗14天的患者中有342例(14.3%)在第90天死亡(RR = 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 ~ 1.07)];p = 0.30;预测区间0.74 ~ 1.17)。平均住院时间无显著差异(平均差异为0.18天[95% CI, -1.03至0.67];p = 0.69;预测区间- 2.57至2.22)。抗生素治疗7天(2406例中64例[2.7%])和抗生素治疗14天(2384例中56例[2.3%])的菌血症复发率相似(RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 ~ 1.63)];p = 0.47;预测区间0.64 ~ 2.03)。安全性指标,包括不良事件总数、艰难梭菌感染、腹泻、急性肾损伤、皮疹和抗生素耐药性,两组之间相似。结论:该荟萃分析表明,7天和14天抗菌药物治疗在菌血症患者中具有相似的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antimicrobial treatment for 7 versus 14 days in patients with bacteremia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Purpose: The optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in patients with bacteremia is a matter of ongoing debate.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared 7 days with 14 days of antimicrobial treatment in adults with bacteremia. The systematic search included trials published until December 2024. Efficacy outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality, recurrence of bacteremia and mean length of hospital stay. Safety outcomes included the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash or emergence of antibiotic resistance.

Results: The final analysis included four randomized controlled trials with a total of 4790 participants. Death by day 90 occurred in 321 (13.3%) of 2406 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 7 days and 342 (14.3%) of 2384 patients receiving antibiotic treatment for 14 days (RR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07)]; p = 0.30; prediction interval 0.74 to 1.17). The mean hospital stay did not differ significantly (mean difference - 0.18 days [95% CI, -1.03 to 0.67]; p = 0.69; prediction interval - 2.57 to 2.22). Recurrence of bacteremia was similar between antibiotic treatment for 7 days (64 [2.7%] of 2406) and antibiotic treatment for 14 days (56 [2.3%] of 2384) (RR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.63)]; p = 0.47; prediction interval 0.64 to 2.03). Safety outcomes, including the total number of adverse events, Clostridioides difficile infections, diarrhea, acute kidney injury, rash, and antibiotic resistance, were similar between groups.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that 7-day and 14-day antimicrobial treatment is associated with a similar efficacy and safety profile in patients with bacteremia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信