Mohammed Al Musawa, Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Sara Alosaimy, Kristen Lucas, Melanie Rae Schrack, Justin Andrade, Shelbye R Herbin, Mark Biagi, Michael Pierce, Kyle C Molina, Nicholson B Perkins, Reese Cosimi, Lena Kang-Birken, Madeline A King, Benjamin M Pullinger, Leonor M Rojas, Jeannette Bouchard, Athena L V Hobbs, Jazmin Agee, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael P Veve, Michael J Rybak
{"title":"依拉瓦环素治疗嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌感染的临床疗效。","authors":"Mohammed Al Musawa, Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Sara Alosaimy, Kristen Lucas, Melanie Rae Schrack, Justin Andrade, Shelbye R Herbin, Mark Biagi, Michael Pierce, Kyle C Molina, Nicholson B Perkins, Reese Cosimi, Lena Kang-Birken, Madeline A King, Benjamin M Pullinger, Leonor M Rojas, Jeannette Bouchard, Athena L V Hobbs, Jazmin Agee, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael P Veve, Michael J Rybak","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01170-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is notable for its rising incidence and multidrug resistance, which complicates treatment. As a result of insufficient clinical studies, the 2024 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on Treating Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-negative Infection advises against using eravacycline (ERV) for S. maltophilia infections. We present real-world data on patients treated with ERV for these infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adult patients who received ERV for treating S. maltophilia infections for ≥ 72 h between October 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the clinical cure evaluated at the end of ERV therapy. Key secondary outcomes included a 30-day survival rate, absence of infection recurrence counting from the end of ERV therapy, and occurrence of possible ERV-related adverse effects (AE) noted in the patient's records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 41 patients were included with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 63 years (46.0-74.5). Most patients were male (63.4%) and white (51.2%). The primary source of infection was pulmonary (56.1%), and most patients received ERV for regimen consolidation (65.9%). Combination therapy was used in about 10% of the cases for S. maltophilia treatment. The median (IQR) duration of ERV treatment was 7 days (4.0-11.5). The clinical cure rate was 73.2%, and the 30-day survival rate was 68.3%. Four patients (9.8%) experienced possible AE from ERV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>S. maltophilia infections are challenging to treat because of limited options. An analysis of 41 patients indicates ERV may be an acceptable treatment option, but more clinical studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Eravacycline in Patients Treated for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Al Musawa, Ashlan J Kunz Coyne, Sara Alosaimy, Kristen Lucas, Melanie Rae Schrack, Justin Andrade, Shelbye R Herbin, Mark Biagi, Michael Pierce, Kyle C Molina, Nicholson B Perkins, Reese Cosimi, Lena Kang-Birken, Madeline A King, Benjamin M Pullinger, Leonor M Rojas, Jeannette Bouchard, Athena L V Hobbs, Jazmin Agee, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael P Veve, Michael J Rybak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-025-01170-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is notable for its rising incidence and multidrug resistance, which complicates treatment. As a result of insufficient clinical studies, the 2024 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on Treating Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-negative Infection advises against using eravacycline (ERV) for S. maltophilia infections. We present real-world data on patients treated with ERV for these infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adult patients who received ERV for treating S. maltophilia infections for ≥ 72 h between October 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the clinical cure evaluated at the end of ERV therapy. Key secondary outcomes included a 30-day survival rate, absence of infection recurrence counting from the end of ERV therapy, and occurrence of possible ERV-related adverse effects (AE) noted in the patient's records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 41 patients were included with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 63 years (46.0-74.5). Most patients were male (63.4%) and white (51.2%). The primary source of infection was pulmonary (56.1%), and most patients received ERV for regimen consolidation (65.9%). Combination therapy was used in about 10% of the cases for S. maltophilia treatment. The median (IQR) duration of ERV treatment was 7 days (4.0-11.5). The clinical cure rate was 73.2%, and the 30-day survival rate was 68.3%. Four patients (9.8%) experienced possible AE from ERV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>S. maltophilia infections are challenging to treat because of limited options. An analysis of 41 patients indicates ERV may be an acceptable treatment option, but more clinical studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01170-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01170-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Outcomes of Eravacycline in Patients Treated for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.
Introduction: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is notable for its rising incidence and multidrug resistance, which complicates treatment. As a result of insufficient clinical studies, the 2024 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on Treating Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-negative Infection advises against using eravacycline (ERV) for S. maltophilia infections. We present real-world data on patients treated with ERV for these infections.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adult patients who received ERV for treating S. maltophilia infections for ≥ 72 h between October 2018 and August 2022. The primary outcome was the clinical cure evaluated at the end of ERV therapy. Key secondary outcomes included a 30-day survival rate, absence of infection recurrence counting from the end of ERV therapy, and occurrence of possible ERV-related adverse effects (AE) noted in the patient's records.
Results: Overall, 41 patients were included with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 63 years (46.0-74.5). Most patients were male (63.4%) and white (51.2%). The primary source of infection was pulmonary (56.1%), and most patients received ERV for regimen consolidation (65.9%). Combination therapy was used in about 10% of the cases for S. maltophilia treatment. The median (IQR) duration of ERV treatment was 7 days (4.0-11.5). The clinical cure rate was 73.2%, and the 30-day survival rate was 68.3%. Four patients (9.8%) experienced possible AE from ERV.
Conclusion: S. maltophilia infections are challenging to treat because of limited options. An analysis of 41 patients indicates ERV may be an acceptable treatment option, but more clinical studies are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety.
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.