社会支持和自我效能感对摩加迪沙-索马里大学生学业压力和心理健康的中介作用

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2025-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.155275.3
Ali Dahir Mohamed, Abdulkadir Jeilani
{"title":"社会支持和自我效能感对摩加迪沙-索马里大学生学业压力和心理健康的中介作用","authors":"Ali Dahir Mohamed, Abdulkadir Jeilani","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.155275.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic stress is a significant factor affecting students' psychological well-being, particularly in higher education. Understanding the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy can provide insights into how these factors influence students' psychological well-being in public and private universities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy in the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being among university students in Mogadishu, Somalia. Utilizing a stratified sampling technique, data were collected from 663 students across public (52.6%) and private (47.4%) universities through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using path analysis to assess direct and indirect effects. Structural equation modeling technique was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed a significant direct effect of academic stress on psychological well-being (β = 0.087, p = 0.001). Social support was significantly related to Academic stress (β = 0.117, p = 0.031) and self-efficacy (β =0.088, p = 0.021). However, both social support (β = 0.099, p = 0.000) and self-efficacy (β = 0.646, p = 0.000) were significantly related to psychological well-being. The mediating analysis showed that social support partially mediated the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being (Indirect effect = 0.012, CI [0.002, 0.024], p = 0.000), while self-efficacy did not mediate this relationship (Indirect effect = 0.057, CI [0.006, 0.111], p = 0.068).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest a significant positive impact of academic stress on psychological well-being, while social support partially mediates this relationship, highlighting its buffering role. Conversely, self-efficacy, although positively contributing to psychological well-being, does not mediate the effect of academic stress. These results underscore the importance of robust social support systems and targeted interventions to enhance students' coping mechanisms and overall psychological well-being. Study limitations and implication are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"13 ","pages":"1108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediating role of Social Support and Self-efficacy on Academic stress and Student's Psychological well-being among University Students in Mogadishu -Somalia.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Dahir Mohamed, Abdulkadir Jeilani\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/f1000research.155275.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Academic stress is a significant factor affecting students' psychological well-being, particularly in higher education. Understanding the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy can provide insights into how these factors influence students' psychological well-being in public and private universities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study examined the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy in the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being among university students in Mogadishu, Somalia. Utilizing a stratified sampling technique, data were collected from 663 students across public (52.6%) and private (47.4%) universities through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using path analysis to assess direct and indirect effects. Structural equation modeling technique was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed a significant direct effect of academic stress on psychological well-being (β = 0.087, p = 0.001). Social support was significantly related to Academic stress (β = 0.117, p = 0.031) and self-efficacy (β =0.088, p = 0.021). However, both social support (β = 0.099, p = 0.000) and self-efficacy (β = 0.646, p = 0.000) were significantly related to psychological well-being. The mediating analysis showed that social support partially mediated the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being (Indirect effect = 0.012, CI [0.002, 0.024], p = 0.000), while self-efficacy did not mediate this relationship (Indirect effect = 0.057, CI [0.006, 0.111], p = 0.068).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest a significant positive impact of academic stress on psychological well-being, while social support partially mediates this relationship, highlighting its buffering role. Conversely, self-efficacy, although positively contributing to psychological well-being, does not mediate the effect of academic stress. These results underscore the importance of robust social support systems and targeted interventions to enhance students' coping mechanisms and overall psychological well-being. Study limitations and implication are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"F1000Research\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"F1000Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155275.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155275.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景:学业压力是影响大学生心理健康的重要因素,在高等教育中尤其如此。了解社会支持和自我效能感的中介作用,有助于了解这些因素如何影响公立和私立大学学生的心理健康。方法:本研究考察了社会支持和自我效能感在学业压力与心理健康关系中的中介作用。采用分层抽样技术,通过结构化问卷收集了来自公立大学(52.6%)和私立大学(47.4%)的663名学生的数据,并使用通径分析来评估直接和间接影响。采用结构方程建模技术对数据进行分析。结果:学业压力对心理健康有显著的直接影响(β = 0.087, p = 0.001)。社会支持与学业压力(β = 0.117, p = 0.031)和自我效能感(β =0.088, p = 0.021)显著相关。而社会支持(β = 0.099, p = 0.000)和自我效能感(β = 0.646, p = 0.000)与心理健康均有显著相关。中介分析显示,社会支持在学业压力与心理健康之间具有部分中介作用(间接效应= 0.012,CI [0.002, 0.024], p = 0.000),自我效能感在学业压力与心理健康之间没有中介作用(间接效应= 0.057,CI [0.006, 0.111], p = 0.068)。结论:学业压力对心理健康有显著的正向影响,而社会支持在这一关系中起部分中介作用,突出其缓冲作用。相反,自我效能感虽然对心理健康有积极的贡献,但并不能调节学业压力的影响。这些结果强调了健全的社会支持系统和有针对性的干预措施对增强学生应对机制和整体心理健康的重要性。讨论了研究的局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mediating role of Social Support and Self-efficacy on Academic stress and Student's Psychological well-being among University Students in Mogadishu -Somalia.

Background: Academic stress is a significant factor affecting students' psychological well-being, particularly in higher education. Understanding the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy can provide insights into how these factors influence students' psychological well-being in public and private universities.

Methods: The study examined the mediating roles of social support and self-efficacy in the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being among university students in Mogadishu, Somalia. Utilizing a stratified sampling technique, data were collected from 663 students across public (52.6%) and private (47.4%) universities through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using path analysis to assess direct and indirect effects. Structural equation modeling technique was used for data analysis.

Results: The analysis revealed a significant direct effect of academic stress on psychological well-being (β = 0.087, p = 0.001). Social support was significantly related to Academic stress (β = 0.117, p = 0.031) and self-efficacy (β =0.088, p = 0.021). However, both social support (β = 0.099, p = 0.000) and self-efficacy (β = 0.646, p = 0.000) were significantly related to psychological well-being. The mediating analysis showed that social support partially mediated the relationship between academic stress and psychological well-being (Indirect effect = 0.012, CI [0.002, 0.024], p = 0.000), while self-efficacy did not mediate this relationship (Indirect effect = 0.057, CI [0.006, 0.111], p = 0.068).

Conclusions: The findings suggest a significant positive impact of academic stress on psychological well-being, while social support partially mediates this relationship, highlighting its buffering role. Conversely, self-efficacy, although positively contributing to psychological well-being, does not mediate the effect of academic stress. These results underscore the importance of robust social support systems and targeted interventions to enhance students' coping mechanisms and overall psychological well-being. Study limitations and implication are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信