Unhyung Lee, Suji Lee, Sung-A Kim, Yohwan Kim, Seunghoon Lee
{"title":"使用RGB-D传感器测量肩部运动范围的单相机无标记运动捕捉系统的有效性和可靠性:系统综述。","authors":"Unhyung Lee, Suji Lee, Sung-A Kim, Yohwan Kim, Seunghoon Lee","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing shoulder joint range-of-motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating shoulder mobility but remains challenging due to its complexity. This review examined the potential of single-camera markerless motion capture systems with an RGB-depth (RGB-D) sensor for shoulder ROM measurements, focusing on their reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched nine databases through December 2022 for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of single-camera markerless motion-capture systems in measuring simple (one-directional) and complex (multi-directional) shoulder movements. We extracted data on participant characteristics, device details, and measurement outcomes, and then assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,976 articles identified, 14 were included in this review. The findings indicate that intra-rater reliability findings across six studies were inconsistent, with simple movements like abduction and flexion demonstrating better reliability and less heterogeneity compared to complex movements. Validity assessments across 12 studies also showed inconsistency, with abduction and flexion measurements exhibiting higher validity than rotational movements. Studies focusing on simple movements reported good to excellent validity, particularly for abduction and flexion. Quality assessments using the COSMIN checklist revealed that the methodological quality varied across studies, ranging from inadequate to very good.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review suggests that RGB-D sensors show promise for measuring shoulder joint ROM, especially in simple movements like flexion and abduction. However, complex movements and inconsistencies limit their immediate clinical applicability, necessitating further high-quality research with advanced devices to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1570637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of single camera markerless motion capture systems with RGB-D sensors for measuring shoulder range-of-motion: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Unhyung Lee, Suji Lee, Sung-A Kim, Yohwan Kim, Seunghoon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing shoulder joint range-of-motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating shoulder mobility but remains challenging due to its complexity. This review examined the potential of single-camera markerless motion capture systems with an RGB-depth (RGB-D) sensor for shoulder ROM measurements, focusing on their reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched nine databases through December 2022 for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of single-camera markerless motion-capture systems in measuring simple (one-directional) and complex (multi-directional) shoulder movements. We extracted data on participant characteristics, device details, and measurement outcomes, and then assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,976 articles identified, 14 were included in this review. The findings indicate that intra-rater reliability findings across six studies were inconsistent, with simple movements like abduction and flexion demonstrating better reliability and less heterogeneity compared to complex movements. Validity assessments across 12 studies also showed inconsistency, with abduction and flexion measurements exhibiting higher validity than rotational movements. Studies focusing on simple movements reported good to excellent validity, particularly for abduction and flexion. Quality assessments using the COSMIN checklist revealed that the methodological quality varied across studies, ranging from inadequate to very good.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review suggests that RGB-D sensors show promise for measuring shoulder joint ROM, especially in simple movements like flexion and abduction. However, complex movements and inconsistencies limit their immediate clinical applicability, necessitating further high-quality research with advanced devices to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1570637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and reliability of single camera markerless motion capture systems with RGB-D sensors for measuring shoulder range-of-motion: a systematic review.
Introduction: Assessing shoulder joint range-of-motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating shoulder mobility but remains challenging due to its complexity. This review examined the potential of single-camera markerless motion capture systems with an RGB-depth (RGB-D) sensor for shoulder ROM measurements, focusing on their reliability and validity.
Methods: We systematically searched nine databases through December 2022 for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of single-camera markerless motion-capture systems in measuring simple (one-directional) and complex (multi-directional) shoulder movements. We extracted data on participant characteristics, device details, and measurement outcomes, and then assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health.
Results: Of the 2,976 articles identified, 14 were included in this review. The findings indicate that intra-rater reliability findings across six studies were inconsistent, with simple movements like abduction and flexion demonstrating better reliability and less heterogeneity compared to complex movements. Validity assessments across 12 studies also showed inconsistency, with abduction and flexion measurements exhibiting higher validity than rotational movements. Studies focusing on simple movements reported good to excellent validity, particularly for abduction and flexion. Quality assessments using the COSMIN checklist revealed that the methodological quality varied across studies, ranging from inadequate to very good.
Discussion: This systematic review suggests that RGB-D sensors show promise for measuring shoulder joint ROM, especially in simple movements like flexion and abduction. However, complex movements and inconsistencies limit their immediate clinical applicability, necessitating further high-quality research with advanced devices to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.
期刊介绍:
The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs.
In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.