使用RGB-D传感器测量肩部运动范围的单相机无标记运动捕捉系统的有效性和可靠性:系统综述。

IF 4.8 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637
Unhyung Lee, Suji Lee, Sung-A Kim, Yohwan Kim, Seunghoon Lee
{"title":"使用RGB-D传感器测量肩部运动范围的单相机无标记运动捕捉系统的有效性和可靠性:系统综述。","authors":"Unhyung Lee, Suji Lee, Sung-A Kim, Yohwan Kim, Seunghoon Lee","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing shoulder joint range-of-motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating shoulder mobility but remains challenging due to its complexity. This review examined the potential of single-camera markerless motion capture systems with an RGB-depth (RGB-D) sensor for shoulder ROM measurements, focusing on their reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched nine databases through December 2022 for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of single-camera markerless motion-capture systems in measuring simple (one-directional) and complex (multi-directional) shoulder movements. We extracted data on participant characteristics, device details, and measurement outcomes, and then assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,976 articles identified, 14 were included in this review. The findings indicate that intra-rater reliability findings across six studies were inconsistent, with simple movements like abduction and flexion demonstrating better reliability and less heterogeneity compared to complex movements. Validity assessments across 12 studies also showed inconsistency, with abduction and flexion measurements exhibiting higher validity than rotational movements. Studies focusing on simple movements reported good to excellent validity, particularly for abduction and flexion. Quality assessments using the COSMIN checklist revealed that the methodological quality varied across studies, ranging from inadequate to very good.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review suggests that RGB-D sensors show promise for measuring shoulder joint ROM, especially in simple movements like flexion and abduction. However, complex movements and inconsistencies limit their immediate clinical applicability, necessitating further high-quality research with advanced devices to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1570637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of single camera markerless motion capture systems with RGB-D sensors for measuring shoulder range-of-motion: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Unhyung Lee, Suji Lee, Sung-A Kim, Yohwan Kim, Seunghoon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Assessing shoulder joint range-of-motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating shoulder mobility but remains challenging due to its complexity. This review examined the potential of single-camera markerless motion capture systems with an RGB-depth (RGB-D) sensor for shoulder ROM measurements, focusing on their reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched nine databases through December 2022 for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of single-camera markerless motion-capture systems in measuring simple (one-directional) and complex (multi-directional) shoulder movements. We extracted data on participant characteristics, device details, and measurement outcomes, and then assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,976 articles identified, 14 were included in this review. The findings indicate that intra-rater reliability findings across six studies were inconsistent, with simple movements like abduction and flexion demonstrating better reliability and less heterogeneity compared to complex movements. Validity assessments across 12 studies also showed inconsistency, with abduction and flexion measurements exhibiting higher validity than rotational movements. Studies focusing on simple movements reported good to excellent validity, particularly for abduction and flexion. Quality assessments using the COSMIN checklist revealed that the methodological quality varied across studies, ranging from inadequate to very good.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review suggests that RGB-D sensors show promise for measuring shoulder joint ROM, especially in simple movements like flexion and abduction. However, complex movements and inconsistencies limit their immediate clinical applicability, necessitating further high-quality research with advanced devices to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1570637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12141239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1570637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估肩关节活动范围(ROM)对于评估肩关节的活动性至关重要,但由于其复杂性仍然具有挑战性。本文研究了带有rgb深度(RGB-D)传感器的单摄像头无标记运动捕捉系统用于肩部ROM测量的潜力,重点关注其可靠性和有效性。方法:到2022年12月,我们系统地检索了9个数据库,以评估单摄像头无标记运动捕捉系统在测量简单(单向)和复杂(多向)肩膀运动方面的可靠性和有效性。我们提取了参与者特征、设备细节和测量结果的数据,然后使用基于共识的健康选择标准评估方法学质量。结果:在鉴定的2976篇文章中,14篇纳入本综述。研究结果表明,六项研究的内部可靠性结果不一致,与复杂的运动相比,简单的运动如外展和屈曲表现出更好的可靠性和更少的异质性。12项研究的有效性评估也显示出不一致,外展和屈曲测量显示出比旋转运动更高的有效性。研究集中在简单的运动报告良好到极好的有效性,特别是外展和屈曲。使用COSMIN检查表进行的质量评估显示,各研究的方法学质量各不相同,从不足到非常好。讨论:本系统综述表明,RGB-D传感器有望测量肩关节ROM,特别是在屈曲和外展等简单运动中。然而,复杂的运动和不一致性限制了它们的直接临床适用性,需要进一步的高质量研究和先进的设备,以确保准确和可靠的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of single camera markerless motion capture systems with RGB-D sensors for measuring shoulder range-of-motion: a systematic review.

Introduction: Assessing shoulder joint range-of-motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating shoulder mobility but remains challenging due to its complexity. This review examined the potential of single-camera markerless motion capture systems with an RGB-depth (RGB-D) sensor for shoulder ROM measurements, focusing on their reliability and validity.

Methods: We systematically searched nine databases through December 2022 for studies that evaluated the reliability and validity of single-camera markerless motion-capture systems in measuring simple (one-directional) and complex (multi-directional) shoulder movements. We extracted data on participant characteristics, device details, and measurement outcomes, and then assessed the methodological quality using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health.

Results: Of the 2,976 articles identified, 14 were included in this review. The findings indicate that intra-rater reliability findings across six studies were inconsistent, with simple movements like abduction and flexion demonstrating better reliability and less heterogeneity compared to complex movements. Validity assessments across 12 studies also showed inconsistency, with abduction and flexion measurements exhibiting higher validity than rotational movements. Studies focusing on simple movements reported good to excellent validity, particularly for abduction and flexion. Quality assessments using the COSMIN checklist revealed that the methodological quality varied across studies, ranging from inadequate to very good.

Discussion: This systematic review suggests that RGB-D sensors show promise for measuring shoulder joint ROM, especially in simple movements like flexion and abduction. However, complex movements and inconsistencies limit their immediate clinical applicability, necessitating further high-quality research with advanced devices to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信