免疫检查点抑制剂因免疫相关不良事件停药后恢复:基于nomogram危险因素和结果分析

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274
Caner Acar, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Gökhan Şahin, Fatma Pinar Açar, Burçak Karaca
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂因免疫相关不良事件停药后恢复:基于nomogram危险因素和结果分析","authors":"Caner Acar, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Gökhan Şahin, Fatma Pinar Açar, Burçak Karaca","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit strong antitumour responses but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment interruption. Resuming ICIs after irAEs remains a clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 97 patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 agents between January 2016 and September 2024. All patients developed irAEs that led to treatment interruption and subsequently resumed the same ICI regimen. Predictors of irAE recurrence were evaluated using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient cohort had a median age of 60 years. 63.9% had received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 36.1% had received combination therapy. Common first irAEs included colitis (37.1%) and hepatitis (24.7%), with 40.2% being grade ≥ 3. Upon resumption, 46.4% experienced recurrent irAEs. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence (84.3 vs. 74.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.866). Younger age, high-grade irAE, colitis, elevated monocytes, and need for nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were independently associated with recurrence. A nomogram constructed using these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.818).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resuming ICI therapy after an irAE is generally feasible, although nearly 50% of patients experience recurrent toxicity. The developed nomogram may support risk-based clinical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"983-991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune checkpoint inhibitor resumption after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events: a nomogram-based analysis of risk factors and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Caner Acar, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Gökhan Şahin, Fatma Pinar Açar, Burçak Karaca\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit strong antitumour responses but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment interruption. Resuming ICIs after irAEs remains a clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 97 patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 agents between January 2016 and September 2024. All patients developed irAEs that led to treatment interruption and subsequently resumed the same ICI regimen. Predictors of irAE recurrence were evaluated using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient cohort had a median age of 60 years. 63.9% had received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 36.1% had received combination therapy. Common first irAEs included colitis (37.1%) and hepatitis (24.7%), with 40.2% being grade ≥ 3. Upon resumption, 46.4% experienced recurrent irAEs. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence (84.3 vs. 74.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.866). Younger age, high-grade irAE, colitis, elevated monocytes, and need for nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were independently associated with recurrence. A nomogram constructed using these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.818).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resuming ICI therapy after an irAE is generally feasible, although nearly 50% of patients experience recurrent toxicity. The developed nomogram may support risk-based clinical decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"983-991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)引起强烈的抗肿瘤反应,但可能导致需要中断治疗的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。在irAEs后恢复ICIs仍然是临床挑战。方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究,纳入2016年1月至2024年9月97例接受抗pd -1±抗ctla -4药物治疗的实体瘤患者。所有患者均出现irae,导致治疗中断,随后恢复相同的ICI方案。采用LASSO回归和后向逐步选择对irAE复发的预测因子进行评估。结果:患者队列的中位年龄为60岁。接受pd -1单药治疗的占63.9%,联合治疗的占36.1%。常见的首发irae包括结肠炎(37.1%)和肝炎(24.7%),其中40.2%为≥3级。复工后,46.4%的人经历了经常性的经济影响评估。有无复发患者的总生存期无显著差异(84.3个月vs 74.6个月,p = 0.866)。年龄较小、高级别irAE、结肠炎、单核细胞升高和需要非甾体免疫抑制剂与复发独立相关。利用这些因素构建的模态图具有良好的判别能力(AUC = 0.818)。结论:尽管近50%的患者出现复发毒性,但在irAE后恢复ICI治疗通常是可行的。发展的线图可以支持基于风险的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune checkpoint inhibitor resumption after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events: a nomogram-based analysis of risk factors and outcomes.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit strong antitumour responses but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment interruption. Resuming ICIs after irAEs remains a clinical challenge.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 97 patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 agents between January 2016 and September 2024. All patients developed irAEs that led to treatment interruption and subsequently resumed the same ICI regimen. Predictors of irAE recurrence were evaluated using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise selection.

Results: The patient cohort had a median age of 60 years. 63.9% had received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 36.1% had received combination therapy. Common first irAEs included colitis (37.1%) and hepatitis (24.7%), with 40.2% being grade ≥ 3. Upon resumption, 46.4% experienced recurrent irAEs. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence (84.3 vs. 74.6 months, p = 0.866). Younger age, high-grade irAE, colitis, elevated monocytes, and need for nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were independently associated with recurrence. A nomogram constructed using these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.818).

Conclusion: Resuming ICI therapy after an irAE is generally feasible, although nearly 50% of patients experience recurrent toxicity. The developed nomogram may support risk-based clinical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信