{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂因免疫相关不良事件停药后恢复:基于nomogram危险因素和结果分析","authors":"Caner Acar, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Gökhan Şahin, Fatma Pinar Açar, Burçak Karaca","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit strong antitumour responses but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment interruption. Resuming ICIs after irAEs remains a clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 97 patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 agents between January 2016 and September 2024. All patients developed irAEs that led to treatment interruption and subsequently resumed the same ICI regimen. Predictors of irAE recurrence were evaluated using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient cohort had a median age of 60 years. 63.9% had received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 36.1% had received combination therapy. Common first irAEs included colitis (37.1%) and hepatitis (24.7%), with 40.2% being grade ≥ 3. Upon resumption, 46.4% experienced recurrent irAEs. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence (84.3 vs. 74.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.866). Younger age, high-grade irAE, colitis, elevated monocytes, and need for nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were independently associated with recurrence. A nomogram constructed using these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.818).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resuming ICI therapy after an irAE is generally feasible, although nearly 50% of patients experience recurrent toxicity. The developed nomogram may support risk-based clinical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"983-991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune checkpoint inhibitor resumption after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events: a nomogram-based analysis of risk factors and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Caner Acar, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Gökhan Şahin, Fatma Pinar Açar, Burçak Karaca\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit strong antitumour responses but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment interruption. Resuming ICIs after irAEs remains a clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included 97 patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 agents between January 2016 and September 2024. All patients developed irAEs that led to treatment interruption and subsequently resumed the same ICI regimen. Predictors of irAE recurrence were evaluated using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise selection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient cohort had a median age of 60 years. 63.9% had received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 36.1% had received combination therapy. Common first irAEs included colitis (37.1%) and hepatitis (24.7%), with 40.2% being grade ≥ 3. Upon resumption, 46.4% experienced recurrent irAEs. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence (84.3 vs. 74.6 months, <i>p</i> = 0.866). Younger age, high-grade irAE, colitis, elevated monocytes, and need for nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were independently associated with recurrence. A nomogram constructed using these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.818).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resuming ICI therapy after an irAE is generally feasible, although nearly 50% of patients experience recurrent toxicity. The developed nomogram may support risk-based clinical decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"983-991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2517274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immune checkpoint inhibitor resumption after discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events: a nomogram-based analysis of risk factors and outcomes.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) elicit strong antitumour responses but may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring treatment interruption. Resuming ICIs after irAEs remains a clinical challenge.
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 97 patients with solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 agents between January 2016 and September 2024. All patients developed irAEs that led to treatment interruption and subsequently resumed the same ICI regimen. Predictors of irAE recurrence were evaluated using LASSO regression followed by backward stepwise selection.
Results: The patient cohort had a median age of 60 years. 63.9% had received anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 36.1% had received combination therapy. Common first irAEs included colitis (37.1%) and hepatitis (24.7%), with 40.2% being grade ≥ 3. Upon resumption, 46.4% experienced recurrent irAEs. Overall survival did not differ significantly between patients with and without recurrence (84.3 vs. 74.6 months, p = 0.866). Younger age, high-grade irAE, colitis, elevated monocytes, and need for nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were independently associated with recurrence. A nomogram constructed using these factors demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC = 0.818).
Conclusion: Resuming ICI therapy after an irAE is generally feasible, although nearly 50% of patients experience recurrent toxicity. The developed nomogram may support risk-based clinical decisions.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.