Zhu Liduzi Jiesisibieke, Héléne Toinét Cronjé, C Mary Schooling, Stephen Burgess
{"title":"寻找常见的遗传变异,允许可靠的孟德尔随机调查酮代谢。","authors":"Zhu Liduzi Jiesisibieke, Héléne Toinét Cronjé, C Mary Schooling, Stephen Burgess","doi":"10.1007/s10654-025-01246-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ketogenic diets are popular among people aiming for weight management. Ketone supplementation has been linked to improved cognitive performance and increased risk of insulin resistance. We aim to identify common genetic variants that allow Mendelian randomization investigations into further potential effects of ketone metabolism. We set four premises that we believe any valid instrument for ketone metabolism should satisfy. These are: (1) location in a gene region relevant to ketone metabolism, (2) association with all three primary ketone bodies (acetone, acetoacetate, and beta-hydroxybutyrate), (3) no pleiotropic associations, (4) associations with positive control variables (cognitive performance, two-hour glucose, and insulin fold change). We considered gene regions containing variants previously associated with acetone. Four of these regions had biological relevance to ketone metabolism. Lead variants for three of these four regions (SLC2A4, HMGCS2, OXCT1) were associated with all three primary ketone bodies. One region (SLC2A4) was associated with two-hour glucose and insulin fold change; however, this region had strong pleiotropic associations with blood pressure. One region (OXCT1) showed an association with cognitive performance, and thus satisfied all our premises to be a valid instrument for ketone metabolism. In a complementary agnostic approach considering all genome-wide significant predictors of the three primary ketone bodies in turn, genetically predicted acetoacetate based on seven variants was associated with improved cognitive performance. However, several variants selected in this approach were not located in biologically relevant gene regions and were pleiotropic. Causal claims from Mendelian randomization will be most reliable when the instrumental variable assumptions are plausibly satisfied. We illustrate a framework to identify candidate instruments based on biological considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11907,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"649-657"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Search for common genetic variants to allow reliable Mendelian randomization investigations into ketone metabolism.\",\"authors\":\"Zhu Liduzi Jiesisibieke, Héléne Toinét Cronjé, C Mary Schooling, Stephen Burgess\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10654-025-01246-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ketogenic diets are popular among people aiming for weight management. Ketone supplementation has been linked to improved cognitive performance and increased risk of insulin resistance. We aim to identify common genetic variants that allow Mendelian randomization investigations into further potential effects of ketone metabolism. We set four premises that we believe any valid instrument for ketone metabolism should satisfy. These are: (1) location in a gene region relevant to ketone metabolism, (2) association with all three primary ketone bodies (acetone, acetoacetate, and beta-hydroxybutyrate), (3) no pleiotropic associations, (4) associations with positive control variables (cognitive performance, two-hour glucose, and insulin fold change). We considered gene regions containing variants previously associated with acetone. Four of these regions had biological relevance to ketone metabolism. Lead variants for three of these four regions (SLC2A4, HMGCS2, OXCT1) were associated with all three primary ketone bodies. One region (SLC2A4) was associated with two-hour glucose and insulin fold change; however, this region had strong pleiotropic associations with blood pressure. One region (OXCT1) showed an association with cognitive performance, and thus satisfied all our premises to be a valid instrument for ketone metabolism. In a complementary agnostic approach considering all genome-wide significant predictors of the three primary ketone bodies in turn, genetically predicted acetoacetate based on seven variants was associated with improved cognitive performance. However, several variants selected in this approach were not located in biologically relevant gene regions and were pleiotropic. Causal claims from Mendelian randomization will be most reliable when the instrumental variable assumptions are plausibly satisfied. We illustrate a framework to identify candidate instruments based on biological considerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"649-657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263766/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01246-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-025-01246-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Search for common genetic variants to allow reliable Mendelian randomization investigations into ketone metabolism.
Ketogenic diets are popular among people aiming for weight management. Ketone supplementation has been linked to improved cognitive performance and increased risk of insulin resistance. We aim to identify common genetic variants that allow Mendelian randomization investigations into further potential effects of ketone metabolism. We set four premises that we believe any valid instrument for ketone metabolism should satisfy. These are: (1) location in a gene region relevant to ketone metabolism, (2) association with all three primary ketone bodies (acetone, acetoacetate, and beta-hydroxybutyrate), (3) no pleiotropic associations, (4) associations with positive control variables (cognitive performance, two-hour glucose, and insulin fold change). We considered gene regions containing variants previously associated with acetone. Four of these regions had biological relevance to ketone metabolism. Lead variants for three of these four regions (SLC2A4, HMGCS2, OXCT1) were associated with all three primary ketone bodies. One region (SLC2A4) was associated with two-hour glucose and insulin fold change; however, this region had strong pleiotropic associations with blood pressure. One region (OXCT1) showed an association with cognitive performance, and thus satisfied all our premises to be a valid instrument for ketone metabolism. In a complementary agnostic approach considering all genome-wide significant predictors of the three primary ketone bodies in turn, genetically predicted acetoacetate based on seven variants was associated with improved cognitive performance. However, several variants selected in this approach were not located in biologically relevant gene regions and were pleiotropic. Causal claims from Mendelian randomization will be most reliable when the instrumental variable assumptions are plausibly satisfied. We illustrate a framework to identify candidate instruments based on biological considerations.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1985, is a peer-reviewed publication that provides a platform for discussions on epidemiology in its broadest sense. It covers various aspects of epidemiologic research and statistical methods. The journal facilitates communication between researchers, educators, and practitioners in epidemiology, including those in clinical and community medicine. Contributions from diverse fields such as public health, preventive medicine, clinical medicine, health economics, and computational biology and data science, in relation to health and disease, are encouraged. While accepting submissions from all over the world, the journal particularly emphasizes European topics relevant to epidemiology. The published articles consist of empirical research findings, developments in methodology, and opinion pieces.