远程医疗对需要家庭护理的吞咽困难患者康复的影响:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Rieko Moritoyo, Kazuharu Nakagawa, Kanako Yoshimi, Kohei Yamaguchi, Yuki Nagasawa, Ryosuke Yanagida, Koji Hara, Haruka Tohara
{"title":"远程医疗对需要家庭护理的吞咽困难患者康复的影响:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Rieko Moritoyo, Kazuharu Nakagawa, Kanako Yoshimi, Kohei Yamaguchi, Yuki Nagasawa, Ryosuke Yanagida, Koji Hara, Haruka Tohara","doi":"10.1007/s00455-025-10844-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated telemedicine as an alternative to home-visit medical care (HMC) when HMC for patients with dysphagia was suspended. This retrospective study assessed whether telemedicine reduced adverse events compared to suspending care during the initial 3 months of the coronavirus pandemic. Seventy-six HMC patients were enrolled. Those who received telemedicine formed the telemedicine group (TG), and those who declined comprised the suspended group (SG). Baseline data and adverse events, including whole-body and dysphagia-related adverse events, were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and binomial logistic regression. Of the 76 patients, 20 were in TG and 56 in SG. Telemedicine consultations' frequency was 1-3. Significant baseline differences occurred in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and caregiver type. In the TG and SG, 0% and 12.5% of patients experienced whole-body adverse events and 10.0% and 33.9% had dysphagia-related adverse events, respectively. Dysphagia-related adverse events were significantly lower in TG (p = 0.046). Telemedicine was significantly associated with fewer dysphagia-related adverse events after adjusting for age, CCI, and Dysphagia Severity Scale (p = 0.040). Telemedicine effectively supplemented in-person dysphagia rehabilitation, enabling continued monitoring and reducing complications, although patient self-selection and caregiver support may have influenced outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11508,"journal":{"name":"Dysphagia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Telemedicine on Dysphagia Rehabilitation in Patients Requiring Home Care: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rieko Moritoyo, Kazuharu Nakagawa, Kanako Yoshimi, Kohei Yamaguchi, Yuki Nagasawa, Ryosuke Yanagida, Koji Hara, Haruka Tohara\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00455-025-10844-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated telemedicine as an alternative to home-visit medical care (HMC) when HMC for patients with dysphagia was suspended. This retrospective study assessed whether telemedicine reduced adverse events compared to suspending care during the initial 3 months of the coronavirus pandemic. Seventy-six HMC patients were enrolled. Those who received telemedicine formed the telemedicine group (TG), and those who declined comprised the suspended group (SG). Baseline data and adverse events, including whole-body and dysphagia-related adverse events, were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and binomial logistic regression. Of the 76 patients, 20 were in TG and 56 in SG. Telemedicine consultations' frequency was 1-3. Significant baseline differences occurred in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and caregiver type. In the TG and SG, 0% and 12.5% of patients experienced whole-body adverse events and 10.0% and 33.9% had dysphagia-related adverse events, respectively. Dysphagia-related adverse events were significantly lower in TG (p = 0.046). Telemedicine was significantly associated with fewer dysphagia-related adverse events after adjusting for age, CCI, and Dysphagia Severity Scale (p = 0.040). Telemedicine effectively supplemented in-person dysphagia rehabilitation, enabling continued monitoring and reducing complications, although patient self-selection and caregiver support may have influenced outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dysphagia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dysphagia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10844-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dysphagia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-025-10844-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了当吞咽困难患者的家访医疗暂停时,远程医疗作为家访医疗(HMC)的替代方案。这项回顾性研究评估了在冠状病毒大流行的头3个月,与暂停护理相比,远程医疗是否减少了不良事件。76名HMC患者入组。接受远程医疗的被称为远程医疗组(TG),拒绝接受远程医疗的被称为暂停组(SG)。基线数据和不良事件,包括全身和吞咽困难相关的不良事件,使用Mann-Whitney u检验、Fisher精确检验和二项逻辑回归进行分析。76例患者中,20例TG, 56例SG。远程医疗咨询频次为1-3次。在查理森合并症指数(CCI)和护理者类型方面存在显著的基线差异。在TG和SG组中,0%和12.5%的患者出现全身不良事件,10.0%和33.9%的患者出现吞咽困难相关不良事件。TG组吞咽困难相关不良事件显著降低(p = 0.046)。在调整年龄、CCI和吞咽困难严重程度量表后,远程医疗与吞咽困难相关不良事件的减少显著相关(p = 0.040)。远程医疗有效地补充了面对面的吞咽困难康复,能够持续监测并减少并发症,尽管患者的自我选择和护理人员的支持可能会影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Telemedicine on Dysphagia Rehabilitation in Patients Requiring Home Care: A Retrospective Study.

This study investigated telemedicine as an alternative to home-visit medical care (HMC) when HMC for patients with dysphagia was suspended. This retrospective study assessed whether telemedicine reduced adverse events compared to suspending care during the initial 3 months of the coronavirus pandemic. Seventy-six HMC patients were enrolled. Those who received telemedicine formed the telemedicine group (TG), and those who declined comprised the suspended group (SG). Baseline data and adverse events, including whole-body and dysphagia-related adverse events, were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher's exact test, and binomial logistic regression. Of the 76 patients, 20 were in TG and 56 in SG. Telemedicine consultations' frequency was 1-3. Significant baseline differences occurred in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and caregiver type. In the TG and SG, 0% and 12.5% of patients experienced whole-body adverse events and 10.0% and 33.9% had dysphagia-related adverse events, respectively. Dysphagia-related adverse events were significantly lower in TG (p = 0.046). Telemedicine was significantly associated with fewer dysphagia-related adverse events after adjusting for age, CCI, and Dysphagia Severity Scale (p = 0.040). Telemedicine effectively supplemented in-person dysphagia rehabilitation, enabling continued monitoring and reducing complications, although patient self-selection and caregiver support may have influenced outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dysphagia
Dysphagia 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Dysphagia aims to serve as a voice for the benefit of the patient. The journal is devoted exclusively to swallowing and its disorders. The purpose of the journal is to provide a source of information to the flourishing dysphagia community. Over the past years, the field of dysphagia has grown rapidly, and the community of dysphagia researchers have galvanized with ambition to represent dysphagia patients. In addition to covering a myriad of disciplines in medicine and speech pathology, the following topics are also covered, but are not limited to: bio-engineering, deglutition, esophageal motility, immunology, and neuro-gastroenterology. The journal aims to foster a growing need for further dysphagia investigation, to disseminate knowledge through research, and to stimulate communication among interested professionals. The journal publishes original papers, technical and instrumental notes, letters to the editor, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信