肌原纤维肌病:迈向基于机制的z盘病定义。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Current Opinion in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000001397
Michio Inoue, Conrad C Weihl
{"title":"肌原纤维肌病:迈向基于机制的z盘病定义。","authors":"Michio Inoue, Conrad C Weihl","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Myofibrillar myopathies (MFMs) are traditionally defined by histopathology, but recent genetic discoveries have broadened the spectrum of causative genes beyond Z-disk components. This review aims to address the resulting terminological inconsistency by proposing a refined, mechanism-based definition of MFM centered on its identity as a \"Z-disk-opathy.\" This re-evaluation is timely and relevant for improving diagnostic clarity and guiding future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The literature increasingly reports MFM-like pathology in conditions caused by mutations in genes not directly encoding Z-disk structural proteins or their interacting chaperones. This review highlights the pathogenic mechanisms distinguishing true MFMs, which involve disruption of Z-disk protein structure or Z-disk protein homeostasis, from \"myopathies with MFM pathology\" that share histological features but stem from different molecular etiologies. Key themes include the dominant nature of mutations in Z-disk structural proteins and the critical role of chaperone dysfunction in MFM pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A refined definition classifying MFM as a \"Z-disk-opathy\" offers a clearer framework for diagnosis and mechanistic understanding. This distinction has significant implications for clinical practice, facilitating more accurate diagnosis, and for research, by supporting the development of targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at either restoring Z-disk proteostasis or mitigating the effects of aberrant protein accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"513-523"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myofibrillar myopathy: towards a mechanism-based definition as a Z-disk-opathy.\",\"authors\":\"Michio Inoue, Conrad C Weihl\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Myofibrillar myopathies (MFMs) are traditionally defined by histopathology, but recent genetic discoveries have broadened the spectrum of causative genes beyond Z-disk components. This review aims to address the resulting terminological inconsistency by proposing a refined, mechanism-based definition of MFM centered on its identity as a \\\"Z-disk-opathy.\\\" This re-evaluation is timely and relevant for improving diagnostic clarity and guiding future research.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The literature increasingly reports MFM-like pathology in conditions caused by mutations in genes not directly encoding Z-disk structural proteins or their interacting chaperones. This review highlights the pathogenic mechanisms distinguishing true MFMs, which involve disruption of Z-disk protein structure or Z-disk protein homeostasis, from \\\"myopathies with MFM pathology\\\" that share histological features but stem from different molecular etiologies. Key themes include the dominant nature of mutations in Z-disk structural proteins and the critical role of chaperone dysfunction in MFM pathogenesis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A refined definition classifying MFM as a \\\"Z-disk-opathy\\\" offers a clearer framework for diagnosis and mechanistic understanding. This distinction has significant implications for clinical practice, facilitating more accurate diagnosis, and for research, by supporting the development of targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at either restoring Z-disk proteostasis or mitigating the effects of aberrant protein accumulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"513-523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354002/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001397\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:肌纤维性肌病(MFMs)传统上是由组织病理学定义的,但最近的遗传学发现扩大了致病基因的范围,超出了z盘成分。本综述的目的是通过提出一个细化的、基于机制的MFM定义,以其“z型椎间盘病变”的身份为中心,来解决由此产生的术语不一致。这种重新评价对提高诊断清晰度和指导未来的研究是及时和相关的。最近的发现:文献越来越多地报道了由不直接编码z盘结构蛋白或其相互作用伴侣的基因突变引起的mfm样病理。这篇综述强调了区分真正的MFM(涉及z -盘蛋白结构或z -盘蛋白稳态的破坏)与“MFM病理肌病”(具有相同的组织学特征,但源于不同的分子病因)的致病机制。关键主题包括z -盘结构蛋白突变的显性性质以及伴侣蛋白功能障碍在MFM发病机制中的关键作用。摘要:将MFM分类为“z型椎间盘病变”提供了一个更清晰的诊断框架和机制理解。这一区别对临床实践具有重要意义,有助于更准确的诊断,并通过支持旨在恢复z盘蛋白平衡或减轻异常蛋白积累影响的靶向治疗策略的发展,对研究具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Myofibrillar myopathy: towards a mechanism-based definition as a Z-disk-opathy.

Purpose of review: Myofibrillar myopathies (MFMs) are traditionally defined by histopathology, but recent genetic discoveries have broadened the spectrum of causative genes beyond Z-disk components. This review aims to address the resulting terminological inconsistency by proposing a refined, mechanism-based definition of MFM centered on its identity as a "Z-disk-opathy." This re-evaluation is timely and relevant for improving diagnostic clarity and guiding future research.

Recent findings: The literature increasingly reports MFM-like pathology in conditions caused by mutations in genes not directly encoding Z-disk structural proteins or their interacting chaperones. This review highlights the pathogenic mechanisms distinguishing true MFMs, which involve disruption of Z-disk protein structure or Z-disk protein homeostasis, from "myopathies with MFM pathology" that share histological features but stem from different molecular etiologies. Key themes include the dominant nature of mutations in Z-disk structural proteins and the critical role of chaperone dysfunction in MFM pathogenesis.

Summary: A refined definition classifying MFM as a "Z-disk-opathy" offers a clearer framework for diagnosis and mechanistic understanding. This distinction has significant implications for clinical practice, facilitating more accurate diagnosis, and for research, by supporting the development of targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at either restoring Z-disk proteostasis or mitigating the effects of aberrant protein accumulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurology
Current Opinion in Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信