抗ro52血清阳性的间质性肺疾病与疾病进展和死亡的高风险相关

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.05.036
Ryosuke Imai, Rene S Bermea, Sophia H Zhao, Sydney B Montesi, Anjali Singh, Bess M Flashner, Andrew J Synn, Julia K Munchel, Mary B Rice, Alyssa Soskis, Barry S Shea, Robert W Hallowell
{"title":"抗ro52血清阳性的间质性肺疾病与疾病进展和死亡的高风险相关","authors":"Ryosuke Imai, Rene S Bermea, Sophia H Zhao, Sydney B Montesi, Anjali Singh, Bess M Flashner, Andrew J Synn, Julia K Munchel, Mary B Rice, Alyssa Soskis, Barry S Shea, Robert W Hallowell","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.05.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying biomarkers is vital for interstitial lung disease (ILD) management and prognostication. Although anti-Ro52 antibodies frequently are detected in autoimmune diseases, their significance in ILD remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What is the prognostic significance of anti-Ro52 antibody positivity in patients with ILD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used an ILD registry of patients seen at an academic tertiary hospital's ILD clinic between 2015 and 2024. All patients with a diagnosis of ILD and tested for anti-Ro52 antibody status were divided into anti-Ro52 positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was ILD progression or all-cause death. ILD progression was defined as any of the following: hospitalization because of ILD, absolute decline in FVC of ≥ 10% predicted from baseline, or lung transplantation. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,026 patients tested for the anti-Ro52 antibody (median age, 70 years; 52% male), 154 patients (15%) showed positive anti-Ro52 results. Underlying ILD subtypes were as follows: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (n = 489 [48%]), connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD (n = 132 [13%]), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 103 [10%]), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n = 61 [6%]), and other idiopathic ILD (n = 241 [24%]). The anti-Ro52-positive group was younger (median age, 67 years vs 70 years), was more likely to have CTD (28% vs 10%), and more frequently showed copositive results for myositis-specific antibody (29% vs 16%). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months, patients with positive anti-Ro52 findings showed a higher risk of ILD progression or death (hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61-2.73; P < .001) and showed a higher risk of lung transplantation or death (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.11-2.35; P = .014) on multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Anti-Ro52-seropositive ILD is associated with significantly worse progression-free and transplant-free survival and may inform disease prognostication and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Ro52 Seropositive Interstitial Lung Disease Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Disease Progression and Mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Ryosuke Imai, Rene S Bermea, Sophia H Zhao, Sydney B Montesi, Anjali Singh, Bess M Flashner, Andrew J Synn, Julia K Munchel, Mary B Rice, Alyssa Soskis, Barry S Shea, Robert W Hallowell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chest.2025.05.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying biomarkers is vital for interstitial lung disease (ILD) management and prognostication. Although anti-Ro52 antibodies frequently are detected in autoimmune diseases, their significance in ILD remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>What is the prognostic significance of anti-Ro52 antibody positivity in patients with ILD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used an ILD registry of patients seen at an academic tertiary hospital's ILD clinic between 2015 and 2024. All patients with a diagnosis of ILD and tested for anti-Ro52 antibody status were divided into anti-Ro52 positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was ILD progression or all-cause death. ILD progression was defined as any of the following: hospitalization because of ILD, absolute decline in FVC of ≥ 10% predicted from baseline, or lung transplantation. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,026 patients tested for the anti-Ro52 antibody (median age, 70 years; 52% male), 154 patients (15%) showed positive anti-Ro52 results. Underlying ILD subtypes were as follows: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (n = 489 [48%]), connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD (n = 132 [13%]), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 103 [10%]), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n = 61 [6%]), and other idiopathic ILD (n = 241 [24%]). The anti-Ro52-positive group was younger (median age, 67 years vs 70 years), was more likely to have CTD (28% vs 10%), and more frequently showed copositive results for myositis-specific antibody (29% vs 16%). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months, patients with positive anti-Ro52 findings showed a higher risk of ILD progression or death (hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61-2.73; P < .001) and showed a higher risk of lung transplantation or death (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.11-2.35; P = .014) on multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Anti-Ro52-seropositive ILD is associated with significantly worse progression-free and transplant-free survival and may inform disease prognostication and monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chest\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.05.036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.05.036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:识别生物标志物对间质性肺疾病(ILD)的管理和预后至关重要。虽然抗ro52抗体经常在自身免疫性疾病中检测到,但其在ILD中的意义尚不清楚。研究问题:抗ro52阳性对ILD患者的预后有何意义?研究设计和方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了2015年至2024年间在一家三级学术医院ILD诊所就诊的ILD登记患者。所有诊断为ILD并检测抗ro52抗体状态的患者分为抗ro52阳性(anti-Ro52 +)组和抗ro52阴性(anti-Ro52 -)组。主要结局是ILD进展或全因死亡。ILD进展定义为以下任何一种情况:因ILD住院;强迫肺活量预测值的绝对降幅比基线≥10%;或者肺移植。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归模型。结果:1026例患者检测抗ro52抗体(中位年龄:70岁;男性52%),Anti-Ro52+ 154例(15%)。潜在的ILD亚型如下:具有自身免疫性特征的间质性肺炎(IPAF) (n = 489, 48%)、结缔组织病-ILD (n = 132, 13%)、特发性肺纤维化(n = 103, 10%)、超敏性肺炎(n = 61, 6%)和其他特发性ILD (n = 241, 24%)。Anti-Ro52+组更年轻(中位年龄67对70岁),更容易发生CTD(28%对10%),更频繁地出现联合性肌炎特异性抗体(29%对16%)。中位随访25.6个月后,抗ro52 +受试者发生ILD进展或死亡的风险更高(风险比2.10;95% ci, 1.61-2.73;结论:抗ro52血清阳性ILD与显著较差的无进展和无移植生存相关,并可能提示疾病预后和监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-Ro52 Seropositive Interstitial Lung Disease Is Associated With a Higher Risk of Disease Progression and Mortality.

Background: Identifying biomarkers is vital for interstitial lung disease (ILD) management and prognostication. Although anti-Ro52 antibodies frequently are detected in autoimmune diseases, their significance in ILD remains unclear.

Research question: What is the prognostic significance of anti-Ro52 antibody positivity in patients with ILD?

Study design and methods: This retrospective cohort study used an ILD registry of patients seen at an academic tertiary hospital's ILD clinic between 2015 and 2024. All patients with a diagnosis of ILD and tested for anti-Ro52 antibody status were divided into anti-Ro52 positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was ILD progression or all-cause death. ILD progression was defined as any of the following: hospitalization because of ILD, absolute decline in FVC of ≥ 10% predicted from baseline, or lung transplantation. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for survival analysis.

Results: Of 1,026 patients tested for the anti-Ro52 antibody (median age, 70 years; 52% male), 154 patients (15%) showed positive anti-Ro52 results. Underlying ILD subtypes were as follows: interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (n = 489 [48%]), connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated ILD (n = 132 [13%]), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 103 [10%]), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (n = 61 [6%]), and other idiopathic ILD (n = 241 [24%]). The anti-Ro52-positive group was younger (median age, 67 years vs 70 years), was more likely to have CTD (28% vs 10%), and more frequently showed copositive results for myositis-specific antibody (29% vs 16%). After a median follow-up of 25.6 months, patients with positive anti-Ro52 findings showed a higher risk of ILD progression or death (hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61-2.73; P < .001) and showed a higher risk of lung transplantation or death (hazard ratio, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.11-2.35; P = .014) on multivariable analysis.

Interpretation: Anti-Ro52-seropositive ILD is associated with significantly worse progression-free and transplant-free survival and may inform disease prognostication and monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信