环钉张力带钢丝治疗鹰嘴横向骨折的理想钉长度和间隔:生物力学研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Seung Hoo Lee, Young Ho Lee
{"title":"环钉张力带钢丝治疗鹰嘴横向骨折的理想钉长度和间隔:生物力学研究。","authors":"Seung Hoo Lee, Young Ho Lee","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08828-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several clinical and biomechanical studies on tension band wiring (TBW) using a ring-pin system have been conducted, but no consensus has been reached on the ideal surgical technique. In this study, we aimed to determine the ideal interval and length of ring pins for the treatment of transverse olecranon fractures using TBW with a ring-pin system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A biomechanical study was performed using 32 fourth-generation composite ulnae and a ring-pin system specially designed for TBW. Four groups of eight sawbones were created based on the interval and length of the ring pins. A cyclic loading test was performed to measure stability during the active range of motion exercises. A load-to-failure test measured the maximal load until fixation loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups were stable, with a micromotion of < 1.0 mm, except for Group 3 (length: 50 mm, interval: 10 mm) during the cyclic loading test. The mean micromotion and displacement of Group 3 were significantly higher than those of Groups 2 and 4 (length: 90 mm, interval: 10 mm). The maximal load to failure in Group 3 was significantly lower than that of Groups 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inserting two ring pins in parallel at a 10-mm interval with a length of ≥ 70 mm for TBW in transverse olecranon fractures is recommended. Further widening of the pin interval provides no biomechanical benefit and may result in technical difficulties owing to the anatomical features of the ulna; in summary, 50-mm ring pins show significantly lower mechanical strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideal pin length and interval in tension band wiring using ring pins for transverse olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Hoo Lee, Young Ho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08828-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several clinical and biomechanical studies on tension band wiring (TBW) using a ring-pin system have been conducted, but no consensus has been reached on the ideal surgical technique. In this study, we aimed to determine the ideal interval and length of ring pins for the treatment of transverse olecranon fractures using TBW with a ring-pin system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A biomechanical study was performed using 32 fourth-generation composite ulnae and a ring-pin system specially designed for TBW. Four groups of eight sawbones were created based on the interval and length of the ring pins. A cyclic loading test was performed to measure stability during the active range of motion exercises. A load-to-failure test measured the maximal load until fixation loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups were stable, with a micromotion of < 1.0 mm, except for Group 3 (length: 50 mm, interval: 10 mm) during the cyclic loading test. The mean micromotion and displacement of Group 3 were significantly higher than those of Groups 2 and 4 (length: 90 mm, interval: 10 mm). The maximal load to failure in Group 3 was significantly lower than that of Groups 2 and 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inserting two ring pins in parallel at a 10-mm interval with a length of ≥ 70 mm for TBW in transverse olecranon fractures is recommended. Further widening of the pin interval provides no biomechanical benefit and may result in technical difficulties owing to the anatomical features of the ulna; in summary, 50-mm ring pins show significantly lower mechanical strength.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142984/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08828-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08828-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用环针系统对张力带钢丝(TBW)进行了一些临床和生物力学研究,但对理想的手术技术尚未达成共识。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定环钉系统治疗横鹰嘴骨折的理想间隔和环钉长度。方法:采用32个第四代复合尺骨和专门为TBW设计的环钉系统进行生物力学研究。根据环针的间隔和长度,制作了四组8个锯骨。进行了循环加载测试,以测量活动范围内运动练习的稳定性。载荷-失效试验测量了最大载荷直到固定损失。结论:对于横尺骨鹰嘴骨折,建议以10 mm间隔平行插入2枚环钉,长度≥70 mm。进一步扩大钉距不会带来生物力学上的好处,而且由于尺骨的解剖特征,可能会导致技术上的困难;综上所述,50mm环销的机械强度明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideal pin length and interval in tension band wiring using ring pins for transverse olecranon fractures: a biomechanical study.

Background: Several clinical and biomechanical studies on tension band wiring (TBW) using a ring-pin system have been conducted, but no consensus has been reached on the ideal surgical technique. In this study, we aimed to determine the ideal interval and length of ring pins for the treatment of transverse olecranon fractures using TBW with a ring-pin system.

Methods: A biomechanical study was performed using 32 fourth-generation composite ulnae and a ring-pin system specially designed for TBW. Four groups of eight sawbones were created based on the interval and length of the ring pins. A cyclic loading test was performed to measure stability during the active range of motion exercises. A load-to-failure test measured the maximal load until fixation loss.

Results: All groups were stable, with a micromotion of < 1.0 mm, except for Group 3 (length: 50 mm, interval: 10 mm) during the cyclic loading test. The mean micromotion and displacement of Group 3 were significantly higher than those of Groups 2 and 4 (length: 90 mm, interval: 10 mm). The maximal load to failure in Group 3 was significantly lower than that of Groups 2 and 4.

Conclusion: Inserting two ring pins in parallel at a 10-mm interval with a length of ≥ 70 mm for TBW in transverse olecranon fractures is recommended. Further widening of the pin interval provides no biomechanical benefit and may result in technical difficulties owing to the anatomical features of the ulna; in summary, 50-mm ring pins show significantly lower mechanical strength.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信