股骨颈系统与非滑动固定治疗年轻paulwels III型股骨颈骨折患者的生物力学评价:有限元分析

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Yang Gao, Zhiyuan Lou, Peng Jia, Xiaohu Chang, Xiaoteng Li, Xin Tang
{"title":"股骨颈系统与非滑动固定治疗年轻paulwels III型股骨颈骨折患者的生物力学评价:有限元分析","authors":"Yang Gao, Zhiyuan Lou, Peng Jia, Xiaohu Chang, Xiaoteng Li, Xin Tang","doi":"10.1186/s12891-025-08761-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performance of the femoral neck system (FNS) and four cannulated screws (FCS) on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model of a young Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with 70° inclination, FNS, and FCS were established, and the fixations were set up. Under an axial load of 2100 N, the finite element anaysis was performed, and the shear force distribution, von Mises stress (VMS), and displacement of each group of models were recorded to analyze the biomechanical effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FNS group exhibited localized shear stress, with a peak value of 181.96 MPa, whereas the FCS group displayed a more dispersed shear stress distribution. In the FCS group, the maximum shear stress values were 71.21 MPa, 66.65 MPa, 59.22 MPa, and 84.23 MPa for the upper anterior parallel, upper posterior parallel, transverse, and lower parallel screws, respectively. The maximum shear stress observed in the femur were 113.98 MPa in the FNS group and 89.39 MPa in the FCS group. VMS in the FNS group was predominantly concentrated at the plate-screw junction, reaching a peak of 326.24 MPa, whereas in the FCS group, it was primarily localized near the fracture site in the mid-screw region, with a maximum value of 166.77 MPa. In the femur, VMS was concentrated at the stress application site on the femoral head, with peak values of 197.54 MPa and 154.85 MPa in the FNS and FCS groups, respectively. The greatest displacement of the internal fixators was observed at the screw heads and the two upper parallel screws, measuring 3.36 mm in the FNS group and 3.28 mm in the FCS group. The maximum displacement of the femur occurred at the stress application site on the femoral head, measuring 3.41 mm and 3.33 mm in the FNS and FCS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparative finite element analysis demonstrates superior biomechanical stability of FCS over FNS, indicating its greater suitability for managing young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9189,"journal":{"name":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"26 1","pages":"575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical evaluation of femoral neck system versus non-sliding fixation in the treatment of young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Gao, Zhiyuan Lou, Peng Jia, Xiaohu Chang, Xiaoteng Li, Xin Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12891-025-08761-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performance of the femoral neck system (FNS) and four cannulated screws (FCS) on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The model of a young Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with 70° inclination, FNS, and FCS were established, and the fixations were set up. Under an axial load of 2100 N, the finite element anaysis was performed, and the shear force distribution, von Mises stress (VMS), and displacement of each group of models were recorded to analyze the biomechanical effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FNS group exhibited localized shear stress, with a peak value of 181.96 MPa, whereas the FCS group displayed a more dispersed shear stress distribution. In the FCS group, the maximum shear stress values were 71.21 MPa, 66.65 MPa, 59.22 MPa, and 84.23 MPa for the upper anterior parallel, upper posterior parallel, transverse, and lower parallel screws, respectively. The maximum shear stress observed in the femur were 113.98 MPa in the FNS group and 89.39 MPa in the FCS group. VMS in the FNS group was predominantly concentrated at the plate-screw junction, reaching a peak of 326.24 MPa, whereas in the FCS group, it was primarily localized near the fracture site in the mid-screw region, with a maximum value of 166.77 MPa. In the femur, VMS was concentrated at the stress application site on the femoral head, with peak values of 197.54 MPa and 154.85 MPa in the FNS and FCS groups, respectively. The greatest displacement of the internal fixators was observed at the screw heads and the two upper parallel screws, measuring 3.36 mm in the FNS group and 3.28 mm in the FCS group. The maximum displacement of the femur occurred at the stress application site on the femoral head, measuring 3.41 mm and 3.33 mm in the FNS and FCS groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comparative finite element analysis demonstrates superior biomechanical stability of FCS over FNS, indicating its greater suitability for managing young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12144777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08761-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-08761-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较股骨颈系统(FNS)与4枚空心螺钉(FCS)治疗年轻Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折患者的生物力学性能。方法:建立70°倾斜年轻Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折模型、FNS和FCS,并固定固定。在2100 N轴向载荷作用下,进行有限元分析,记录各组模型的剪切力分布、von Mises应力(VMS)和位移,分析生物力学效应。结果:FNS组呈现局部剪应力,剪应力峰值为181.96 MPa,而FCS组剪应力分布更为分散。FCS组上前平行螺钉、上后平行螺钉、横向螺钉和下平行螺钉的最大剪应力值分别为71.21 MPa、66.65 MPa、59.22 MPa和84.23 MPa。FNS组股骨最大剪切应力为113.98 MPa, FCS组为89.39 MPa。FNS组VMS主要集中在板螺钉连接处,峰值为326.24 MPa,而FCS组VMS主要集中在螺钉中部骨折部位附近,峰值为166.77 MPa。在股骨中,VMS集中在股骨头的受力部位,FNS组和FCS组的峰值分别为197.54 MPa和154.85 MPa。FNS组和FCS组内固定物的最大位移分别为3.36 mm和3.28 mm。FNS组和FCS组股骨最大位移发生在股骨头受力部位,分别为3.41 mm和3.33 mm。结论:对比有限元分析显示FCS优于FNS的生物力学稳定性,表明FCS更适合治疗年轻的Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical evaluation of femoral neck system versus non-sliding fixation in the treatment of young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performance of the femoral neck system (FNS) and four cannulated screws (FCS) on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Methods: The model of a young Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with 70° inclination, FNS, and FCS were established, and the fixations were set up. Under an axial load of 2100 N, the finite element anaysis was performed, and the shear force distribution, von Mises stress (VMS), and displacement of each group of models were recorded to analyze the biomechanical effects.

Results: The FNS group exhibited localized shear stress, with a peak value of 181.96 MPa, whereas the FCS group displayed a more dispersed shear stress distribution. In the FCS group, the maximum shear stress values were 71.21 MPa, 66.65 MPa, 59.22 MPa, and 84.23 MPa for the upper anterior parallel, upper posterior parallel, transverse, and lower parallel screws, respectively. The maximum shear stress observed in the femur were 113.98 MPa in the FNS group and 89.39 MPa in the FCS group. VMS in the FNS group was predominantly concentrated at the plate-screw junction, reaching a peak of 326.24 MPa, whereas in the FCS group, it was primarily localized near the fracture site in the mid-screw region, with a maximum value of 166.77 MPa. In the femur, VMS was concentrated at the stress application site on the femoral head, with peak values of 197.54 MPa and 154.85 MPa in the FNS and FCS groups, respectively. The greatest displacement of the internal fixators was observed at the screw heads and the two upper parallel screws, measuring 3.36 mm in the FNS group and 3.28 mm in the FCS group. The maximum displacement of the femur occurred at the stress application site on the femoral head, measuring 3.41 mm and 3.33 mm in the FNS and FCS groups, respectively.

Conclusion: Comparative finite element analysis demonstrates superior biomechanical stability of FCS over FNS, indicating its greater suitability for managing young Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1017
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The scope of the Journal covers research into rheumatic diseases where the primary focus relates specifically to a component(s) of the musculoskeletal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信