在主要肝切除术前增加未来肝残余:菜单上选项的回顾。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17607-z
Paul Wong, Peter Vien, Jonathan Kessler, Kelly Lafaro, Alice Wei, Laleh G Melstrom
{"title":"在主要肝切除术前增加未来肝残余:菜单上选项的回顾。","authors":"Paul Wong, Peter Vien, Jonathan Kessler, Kelly Lafaro, Alice Wei, Laleh G Melstrom","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17607-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimization of the future liver remnant (FLR) is paramount in improving outcomes for patients undergoing liver surgery, as post-hepatectomy liver failure remains a major source of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A wide collection of techniques has been introduced with the goal of augmenting the FLR prior to hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver malignancies, and these modalities include portal vein embolization (PVE), portal vein ligation (PVL), liver venous deprivation (LVD), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and radioembolization (e.g., Y-90). There are advantages and drawbacks for each of these methods regarding the capacity for FLR hypertrophy sufficient for resection, perioperative morbidity/mortality, and long-term oncologic outcomes. In the context of technical variations when performing the procedures, there have been comparative studies between the various methods of FLR optimization, however, not many in a controlled fashion. Results from ongoing and future randomized controlled trials will help refine these techniques, directly compare outcomes, and personalize strategies based on patient-specific factors. In this review, the benefits of the various FLR augmentation approaches are summarized and the current literature and trials are reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5694-5709"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmenting the Future Liver Remnant Prior to Major Hepatectomy: A Review of Options on the Menu.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Wong, Peter Vien, Jonathan Kessler, Kelly Lafaro, Alice Wei, Laleh G Melstrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17607-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The optimization of the future liver remnant (FLR) is paramount in improving outcomes for patients undergoing liver surgery, as post-hepatectomy liver failure remains a major source of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A wide collection of techniques has been introduced with the goal of augmenting the FLR prior to hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver malignancies, and these modalities include portal vein embolization (PVE), portal vein ligation (PVL), liver venous deprivation (LVD), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and radioembolization (e.g., Y-90). There are advantages and drawbacks for each of these methods regarding the capacity for FLR hypertrophy sufficient for resection, perioperative morbidity/mortality, and long-term oncologic outcomes. In the context of technical variations when performing the procedures, there have been comparative studies between the various methods of FLR optimization, however, not many in a controlled fashion. Results from ongoing and future randomized controlled trials will help refine these techniques, directly compare outcomes, and personalize strategies based on patient-specific factors. In this review, the benefits of the various FLR augmentation approaches are summarized and the current literature and trials are reviewed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5694-5709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12222409/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17607-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17607-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

优化未来肝残体(FLR)对于改善肝手术患者的预后至关重要,因为肝切除术后肝功能衰竭仍然是术后发病率和死亡率的主要来源。为了提高原发性和继发性肝脏恶性肿瘤肝切除术前的FLR,已经引入了一系列广泛的技术,这些技术包括门静脉栓塞(PVE)、门静脉结扎(PVL)、肝静脉剥夺(LVD)、肝分区和门静脉结扎分阶段肝切除术(ALPPS)和放射栓塞(例如Y-90)。关于FLR肥大是否足以切除、围手术期发病率/死亡率和长期肿瘤预后,这些方法各有优缺点。在执行程序时的技术变化的背景下,已经对各种FLR优化方法进行了比较研究,然而,以受控方式进行的研究并不多。正在进行的和未来的随机对照试验的结果将有助于改进这些技术,直接比较结果,并根据患者的具体因素制定个性化的策略。在这篇综述中,总结了各种FLR增强方法的好处,并对目前的文献和试验进行了回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Augmenting the Future Liver Remnant Prior to Major Hepatectomy: A Review of Options on the Menu.

The optimization of the future liver remnant (FLR) is paramount in improving outcomes for patients undergoing liver surgery, as post-hepatectomy liver failure remains a major source of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A wide collection of techniques has been introduced with the goal of augmenting the FLR prior to hepatectomy for primary and secondary liver malignancies, and these modalities include portal vein embolization (PVE), portal vein ligation (PVL), liver venous deprivation (LVD), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and radioembolization (e.g., Y-90). There are advantages and drawbacks for each of these methods regarding the capacity for FLR hypertrophy sufficient for resection, perioperative morbidity/mortality, and long-term oncologic outcomes. In the context of technical variations when performing the procedures, there have been comparative studies between the various methods of FLR optimization, however, not many in a controlled fashion. Results from ongoing and future randomized controlled trials will help refine these techniques, directly compare outcomes, and personalize strategies based on patient-specific factors. In this review, the benefits of the various FLR augmentation approaches are summarized and the current literature and trials are reviewed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信