功能性神经疾病的当前观点和实践:对印度神经科医生的调查。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jitendra Upadhyay, Kartika Gulati, Sanjay Pandey
{"title":"功能性神经疾病的当前观点和实践:对印度神经科医生的调查。","authors":"Jitendra Upadhyay, Kartika Gulati, Sanjay Pandey","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_116_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term \"functional.\" Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of \"functional\" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Opinions and Practices in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Survey of Indian Neurologists.\",\"authors\":\"Jitendra Upadhyay, Kartika Gulati, Sanjay Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aian.aian_116_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term \\\"functional.\\\" Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of \\\"functional\\\" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_116_25\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_116_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:功能性神经障碍(FNDs)在临床实践中很常见,是导致残疾的重要原因。在印度,非传染性疾病的表现受到社会文化因素的影响,但关于如何认识和管理非传染性疾病的研究有限。本调查旨在探讨印度神经科医生对fnd的不同临床经验,包括他们面临的诊断和管理挑战。方法:对印度1571名神经科医生进行在线调查,在4周内收集117份回复(7.45%)。该问卷旨在了解受访者的人口统计数据、FND的诱发因素和相关的耻辱感、诊断工具的使用、多学科团队的访问、患者管理方面的挑战以及FND研究和社会的参与情况。结果:总体而言,78.6%的受访者更喜欢“功能性”一词。家庭视频(99.1%)和多学科团队(67.5%)是常用的。障碍包括时间限制(73.5%)和围绕fnd的普遍误解(95.7%)。只有23.9%的人报告使用神经生理工具治疗FND。fnd特定社团(3.4%)和研究(12%)的参与率非常低。结论:我们的调查突出了印度FND护理的发展趋势和持续挑战。虽然采用“功能性”术语、家庭视频诊断和多学科方法标志着进展,但障碍包括时间限制和普遍的误解。神经生理学工具的利用不足是一个重大障碍,而且FND研究和社会的专业参与也很有限。加强教育、专业培训和专业参与对改善FND护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current Opinions and Practices in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Survey of Indian Neurologists.

Background and objectives: Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.

Methods: An online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.

Results: Overall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term "functional." Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.

Conclusions: Our survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of "functional" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信