{"title":"功能性神经疾病的当前观点和实践:对印度神经科医生的调查。","authors":"Jitendra Upadhyay, Kartika Gulati, Sanjay Pandey","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_116_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term \"functional.\" Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of \"functional\" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Opinions and Practices in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Survey of Indian Neurologists.\",\"authors\":\"Jitendra Upadhyay, Kartika Gulati, Sanjay Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aian.aian_116_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term \\\"functional.\\\" Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of \\\"functional\\\" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_116_25\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_116_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current Opinions and Practices in Functional Neurological Disorders: A Survey of Indian Neurologists.
Background and objectives: Functional neurological disorders (FNDs) are common in clinical practice and a significant cause of disability. In India, the presentation of FNDs is influenced by socio-cultural factors, yet there is limited research on how FNDs are perceived and managed. This survey aimed to explore the diverse clinical experiences of Indian neurologists on FNDs, including the diagnostic and management challenges they face.
Methods: An online survey was sent to 1,571 neurologists across India, collecting 117 responses (7.45%) over 4 weeks. The questionnaire was designed to capture respondent demographics, FND precipitating factors and associated stigma, utilization of diagnostic tools, access to multidisciplinary teams, challenges in patient management, and engagement in FND research and societies.
Results: Overall, 78.6% of the respondents preferred the term "functional." Home-based videos (99.1%) and multidisciplinary teams (67.5%) were commonly used. Barriers included time constraints (73.5%) and prevalent myths surrounding FNDs (95.7%). Only 23.9% reported using neurophysiological tools in FND. Participation in FND-specific societies (3.4%) and research (12%) was remarkably low.
Conclusions: Our survey highlights evolving trends and persistent challenges in FND care in India. While the adoption of "functional" terminology, home-based videos for diagnosis, and multidisciplinary approaches mark progress, barriers include time constraints, and prevalent myths. Underutilization of neurophysiological tools is a significant barrier, and professional engagement in FND research and societies is also limited. Enhancing education, specialized training, and professional engagement is essential for improving FND care.
期刊介绍:
The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.