Mohammed A Elbahloul, Ammar Elgadi, Mohamed Ramadan, Houssaini Mohamed Amine, Hossam Fayed, Mohamed E Kasser, Ahmed Hussein, Fatma Labieb
{"title":"血脂异常患者使用培马哌特的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和最新荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammed A Elbahloul, Ammar Elgadi, Mohamed Ramadan, Houssaini Mohamed Amine, Hossam Fayed, Mohamed E Kasser, Ahmed Hussein, Fatma Labieb","doi":"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with dyslipidemia are at risk for cardiovascular diseases. Lowering levels of lipid decrease morbidity. Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα) that works better at lowering serum triglycerides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical trials investigating the effect of pemafibrate on lipid biomarkers in patients with dyslipidemia were searched in PubMed, Ovid Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Library from inception till 31 December 2023. The data were pooled as mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 clinical trials were eligible, involving 12 451 patients, and showed favorable triglyceride level change (MD: -49.60 [-62.64, -36.55] <i>P</i> < 0.00001) for pemafibrate compared to placebo. Pemafibrate showed a significant increase in HDL-C levels (MD: 14.57 [10.14, 19.01] <i>P</i> < 0.00001) but showed a concurrent increase in LDL-C levels (MD: 10.99 [6.10, 15.88] <i>P</i> < 0.00001). It also showed non-HDL-C, total cholesterol level, Apo B, Apo C-II, and Apo C-III to be significantly reduced in pemafibrate groups. Also, in pemafibrate groups, hepatic adverse events were reported less frequently than in placebo groups. No significant difference was found in the frequency of total adverse effects, adverse drug reactions, or serious adverse events between the pemafibrate and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pemafibrate improved the overall lipid biomarkers compared to placebo groups, demonstrating a significant reduction in triglycerides, non-HDL-C, and total cholesterol while increasing HDL-C. Moreover, there was no significant difference in adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8025,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","volume":"87 6","pages":"3756-3767"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate administration in patients with dyslipidemia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed A Elbahloul, Ammar Elgadi, Mohamed Ramadan, Houssaini Mohamed Amine, Hossam Fayed, Mohamed E Kasser, Ahmed Hussein, Fatma Labieb\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MS9.0000000000003264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with dyslipidemia are at risk for cardiovascular diseases. Lowering levels of lipid decrease morbidity. Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα) that works better at lowering serum triglycerides.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical trials investigating the effect of pemafibrate on lipid biomarkers in patients with dyslipidemia were searched in PubMed, Ovid Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Library from inception till 31 December 2023. The data were pooled as mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 clinical trials were eligible, involving 12 451 patients, and showed favorable triglyceride level change (MD: -49.60 [-62.64, -36.55] <i>P</i> < 0.00001) for pemafibrate compared to placebo. Pemafibrate showed a significant increase in HDL-C levels (MD: 14.57 [10.14, 19.01] <i>P</i> < 0.00001) but showed a concurrent increase in LDL-C levels (MD: 10.99 [6.10, 15.88] <i>P</i> < 0.00001). It also showed non-HDL-C, total cholesterol level, Apo B, Apo C-II, and Apo C-III to be significantly reduced in pemafibrate groups. Also, in pemafibrate groups, hepatic adverse events were reported less frequently than in placebo groups. No significant difference was found in the frequency of total adverse effects, adverse drug reactions, or serious adverse events between the pemafibrate and placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pemafibrate improved the overall lipid biomarkers compared to placebo groups, demonstrating a significant reduction in triglycerides, non-HDL-C, and total cholesterol while increasing HDL-C. Moreover, there was no significant difference in adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"87 6\",\"pages\":\"3756-3767\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000003264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:血脂异常患者有发生心血管疾病的危险。降低血脂水平可以降低发病率。pemafbrate是一种选择性过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体α调节剂(SPPARMα),在降低血清甘油三酯方面效果更好。方法:在PubMed、Ovid Medline、SCOPUS、Web of Science (WOS)和Cochrane Library中检索自成立至2023年12月31日期间研究培马菲特对血脂异常患者脂质生物标志物影响的临床试验。将数据汇总为平均差、优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:14项临床试验,涉及12451例患者,显示出良好的甘油三酯水平变化(MD: -49.60 [-62.64, -36.55] P P P P结论:与安慰剂组相比,培马替贝特改善了总体脂质生物标志物,显示出甘油三酯、非HDL-C和总胆固醇显著降低,而HDL-C升高。两组不良反应差异无统计学意义。
Efficacy and safety of pemafibrate administration in patients with dyslipidemia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background: Patients with dyslipidemia are at risk for cardiovascular diseases. Lowering levels of lipid decrease morbidity. Pemafibrate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator (SPPARMα) that works better at lowering serum triglycerides.
Methods: Clinical trials investigating the effect of pemafibrate on lipid biomarkers in patients with dyslipidemia were searched in PubMed, Ovid Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science (WOS), and the Cochrane Library from inception till 31 December 2023. The data were pooled as mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: 14 clinical trials were eligible, involving 12 451 patients, and showed favorable triglyceride level change (MD: -49.60 [-62.64, -36.55] P < 0.00001) for pemafibrate compared to placebo. Pemafibrate showed a significant increase in HDL-C levels (MD: 14.57 [10.14, 19.01] P < 0.00001) but showed a concurrent increase in LDL-C levels (MD: 10.99 [6.10, 15.88] P < 0.00001). It also showed non-HDL-C, total cholesterol level, Apo B, Apo C-II, and Apo C-III to be significantly reduced in pemafibrate groups. Also, in pemafibrate groups, hepatic adverse events were reported less frequently than in placebo groups. No significant difference was found in the frequency of total adverse effects, adverse drug reactions, or serious adverse events between the pemafibrate and placebo groups.
Conclusion: Pemafibrate improved the overall lipid biomarkers compared to placebo groups, demonstrating a significant reduction in triglycerides, non-HDL-C, and total cholesterol while increasing HDL-C. Moreover, there was no significant difference in adverse effects.