虚拟现实在感染防控教育中的应用:对医学生知识、态度和行为的影响

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Bente Schippers, Olga Coenen, Franka Luk, Mark Graner, Frans van Hoek, Nike Stikkelbroeck, Machteld Dronkers, Edmée Bowles, Alma Tostmann
{"title":"虚拟现实在感染防控教育中的应用:对医学生知识、态度和行为的影响","authors":"Bente Schippers, Olga Coenen, Franka Luk, Mark Graner, Frans van Hoek, Nike Stikkelbroeck, Machteld Dronkers, Edmée Bowles, Alma Tostmann","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01585-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyse the impact of a newly developed infection prevention and control (IPC) Virtual Reality (VR)-module on medical students' IPC knowledge, attitudes and practices. Additionally, the impact of the module on students' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) confidence regarding IPC decision-making and their insight into consequences of IPC decisions were analysed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IPC VR-module was developed using a cyclical design process consisting of a prototype, first and final version. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding IPC were compared between two groups of medical students. The VR-module was added to the IPC program for the VR group. After completion of the program, students of both groups were asked to complete an online questionnaire. Scores were summated for each subscale of the KAP, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare scores between groups. Student and HCP responses to VR-specific questions were dichotomized and a chi-square test was used to compare responses to different versions of the module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who completed the VR-module (n = 34) scored higher on IPC knowledge questions (score 8 / 10), than those who followed the regular program (n = 58; score 7/10; p = 0.003). For the final version, the added value of the VR-module in the program was recognized by 95% of students and 90% of HCPs. Students and HCPs who completed the final version of the VR-module agreed more often with learning objectives of the VR-module than those who completed the first version. 100% vs. 80% for the statement on insight into consequences of choices (p < 0.001) and 89% vs. 73% for the statement on confidence taking IPC decisions (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The innovative IPC VR-module positively impacted students IPC knowledge and was highly appreciated by students and HCPs. VR-specific learning objectives were achieved, especially for the final version of the VR-module, demonstrating the importance of a cyclical design process.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality for education on infection prevention and control: the impact on medical students' knowledge, attitudes and practices.\",\"authors\":\"Bente Schippers, Olga Coenen, Franka Luk, Mark Graner, Frans van Hoek, Nike Stikkelbroeck, Machteld Dronkers, Edmée Bowles, Alma Tostmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13756-025-01585-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to analyse the impact of a newly developed infection prevention and control (IPC) Virtual Reality (VR)-module on medical students' IPC knowledge, attitudes and practices. Additionally, the impact of the module on students' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) confidence regarding IPC decision-making and their insight into consequences of IPC decisions were analysed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IPC VR-module was developed using a cyclical design process consisting of a prototype, first and final version. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding IPC were compared between two groups of medical students. The VR-module was added to the IPC program for the VR group. After completion of the program, students of both groups were asked to complete an online questionnaire. Scores were summated for each subscale of the KAP, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare scores between groups. Student and HCP responses to VR-specific questions were dichotomized and a chi-square test was used to compare responses to different versions of the module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who completed the VR-module (n = 34) scored higher on IPC knowledge questions (score 8 / 10), than those who followed the regular program (n = 58; score 7/10; p = 0.003). For the final version, the added value of the VR-module in the program was recognized by 95% of students and 90% of HCPs. Students and HCPs who completed the final version of the VR-module agreed more often with learning objectives of the VR-module than those who completed the first version. 100% vs. 80% for the statement on insight into consequences of choices (p < 0.001) and 89% vs. 73% for the statement on confidence taking IPC decisions (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The innovative IPC VR-module positively impacted students IPC knowledge and was highly appreciated by students and HCPs. VR-specific learning objectives were achieved, especially for the final version of the VR-module, demonstrating the importance of a cyclical design process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01585-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01585-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在分析新开发的感染预防与控制(IPC)虚拟现实(VR)模块对医学生感染预防与控制知识、态度和行为的影响。此外,还分析了该模块对学生和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对IPC决策的信心以及他们对IPC决策后果的洞察力的影响。方法:采用由原型、初版和终版组成的循环设计过程开发IPC vr模块。比较两组医学生对IPC的知识、态度和行为。日志含义在虚拟现实组的IPC程序中添加虚拟现实模块。课程结束后,两组学生都被要求完成一份在线问卷。将KAP各分量表的得分相加,采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较组间得分。学生和HCP对vr特定问题的回答被二分类,并使用卡方检验来比较对不同版本模块的回答。结果:完成vr模块的学生(n = 34)在IPC知识问题(得分8 / 10)上的得分高于遵循常规课程的学生(n = 58;分数7/10;p = 0.003)。在最终版本中,95%的学生和90%的医护人员认可了vr模块在项目中的附加价值。完成虚拟现实模块最终版本的学生和医护人员比完成第一版的学生更同意虚拟现实模块的学习目标。结论:创新的IPC vr模块对学生的IPC知识产生了积极的影响,受到学生和医护人员的高度赞赏。vr特定的学习目标得以实现,尤其是vr模块的最终版本,这证明了周期性设计过程的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Virtual reality for education on infection prevention and control: the impact on medical students' knowledge, attitudes and practices.

Background: This study aims to analyse the impact of a newly developed infection prevention and control (IPC) Virtual Reality (VR)-module on medical students' IPC knowledge, attitudes and practices. Additionally, the impact of the module on students' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) confidence regarding IPC decision-making and their insight into consequences of IPC decisions were analysed.

Methods: The IPC VR-module was developed using a cyclical design process consisting of a prototype, first and final version. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding IPC were compared between two groups of medical students. The VR-module was added to the IPC program for the VR group. After completion of the program, students of both groups were asked to complete an online questionnaire. Scores were summated for each subscale of the KAP, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare scores between groups. Student and HCP responses to VR-specific questions were dichotomized and a chi-square test was used to compare responses to different versions of the module.

Results: Students who completed the VR-module (n = 34) scored higher on IPC knowledge questions (score 8 / 10), than those who followed the regular program (n = 58; score 7/10; p = 0.003). For the final version, the added value of the VR-module in the program was recognized by 95% of students and 90% of HCPs. Students and HCPs who completed the final version of the VR-module agreed more often with learning objectives of the VR-module than those who completed the first version. 100% vs. 80% for the statement on insight into consequences of choices (p < 0.001) and 89% vs. 73% for the statement on confidence taking IPC decisions (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The innovative IPC VR-module positively impacted students IPC knowledge and was highly appreciated by students and HCPs. VR-specific learning objectives were achieved, especially for the final version of the VR-module, demonstrating the importance of a cyclical design process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
140
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信