艾伯塔省持续护理环境中的省级个人防护装备安全教练项目评估。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kaethel M Decker, Heather Gagnon, Abram Gutscher, Meaghan Brierley, Sara Mallinson, Jenine Leal
{"title":"艾伯塔省持续护理环境中的省级个人防护装备安全教练项目评估。","authors":"Kaethel M Decker, Heather Gagnon, Abram Gutscher, Meaghan Brierley, Sara Mallinson, Jenine Leal","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alberta Health Services (AHS) offered the Provincial Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Safety Coach Program to continuing care homes to provide support to staff regarding the safe and appropriate use of PPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate staff experiences of training, adoption, and perceived impact of the program. Data were gathered using an online survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews. The evaluation drew on two implementation science frameworks to review implementation processes and contextual factors influencing program uptake and participant experiences: RE-AIM, for its focus on program planning and processes and the CFIR to guide the review of characteristics and settings that may explain why implementation was or was not successful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 283 surveys and 22 qualitative interviews were completed. Key factors continuing care staff considered and provided feedback on are grouped into the following categories: program uptake, program content and delivery, skills and knowledge, the program's perceived impact and feedback from non-adopting sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trained staff were largely satisfied with the delivery and content of the modules and other staff indicated it was beneficial to have support from trained staff. Sites that did not adopt the program indicated that the timing of the launch, ongoing staffing challenges, and the use of alternative PPE training were barriers to uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provincial PPE Safety Coach Program Evaluation in Continuing Care Settings in Alberta.\",\"authors\":\"Kaethel M Decker, Heather Gagnon, Abram Gutscher, Meaghan Brierley, Sara Mallinson, Jenine Leal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alberta Health Services (AHS) offered the Provincial Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Safety Coach Program to continuing care homes to provide support to staff regarding the safe and appropriate use of PPE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate staff experiences of training, adoption, and perceived impact of the program. Data were gathered using an online survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews. The evaluation drew on two implementation science frameworks to review implementation processes and contextual factors influencing program uptake and participant experiences: RE-AIM, for its focus on program planning and processes and the CFIR to guide the review of characteristics and settings that may explain why implementation was or was not successful.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 283 surveys and 22 qualitative interviews were completed. Key factors continuing care staff considered and provided feedback on are grouped into the following categories: program uptake, program content and delivery, skills and knowledge, the program's perceived impact and feedback from non-adopting sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Trained staff were largely satisfied with the delivery and content of the modules and other staff indicated it was beneficial to have support from trained staff. Sites that did not adopt the program indicated that the timing of the launch, ongoing staffing challenges, and the use of alternative PPE training were barriers to uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.06.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.06.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:艾伯塔省卫生服务中心(AHS)向继续护理之家提供省级个人防护装备(PPE)安全教练方案,以向工作人员提供有关安全和适当使用个人防护装备的支持。方法:采用混合方法来评估员工在培训、采用和项目感知影响方面的经验。数据是通过在线调查和半结构化定性访谈收集的。评估利用了两个实施科学框架来审查实施过程和影响方案吸收和参与者经验的背景因素:RE-AIM,侧重于方案规划和流程;CFIR,指导审查可能解释实施成功或不成功原因的特征和环境。结果:共完成问卷调查283次,质性访谈22次。持续护理人员考虑并提供反馈的关键因素分为以下几类:项目吸收、项目内容和交付、技能和知识、项目的感知影响以及来自未采用项目的站点的反馈。结论:经过培训的员工对模块的交付和内容基本满意,其他员工表示得到培训人员的支持是有益的。未采用该计划的站点表明,启动时间、持续的人员配备挑战以及使用替代PPE培训是采用该计划的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provincial PPE Safety Coach Program Evaluation in Continuing Care Settings in Alberta.

Background: Alberta Health Services (AHS) offered the Provincial Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Safety Coach Program to continuing care homes to provide support to staff regarding the safe and appropriate use of PPE.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate staff experiences of training, adoption, and perceived impact of the program. Data were gathered using an online survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews. The evaluation drew on two implementation science frameworks to review implementation processes and contextual factors influencing program uptake and participant experiences: RE-AIM, for its focus on program planning and processes and the CFIR to guide the review of characteristics and settings that may explain why implementation was or was not successful.

Results: A total of 283 surveys and 22 qualitative interviews were completed. Key factors continuing care staff considered and provided feedback on are grouped into the following categories: program uptake, program content and delivery, skills and knowledge, the program's perceived impact and feedback from non-adopting sites.

Conclusions: Trained staff were largely satisfied with the delivery and content of the modules and other staff indicated it was beneficial to have support from trained staff. Sites that did not adopt the program indicated that the timing of the launch, ongoing staffing challenges, and the use of alternative PPE training were barriers to uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信