{"title":"人工晶状体——以个人和企业专利创新衡量的太平盛世。","authors":"Trevor Lin , Lynn E. Harman , Curtis E. Margo","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the contributions of individuals and corporate manufacturers to the design of artificial intraocular lenses (IOLs) conferred through patents.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Historical review and analysis of IOL patents from 1950 through 2000.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The annual number of IOL patents granted to individuals and companies was obtained from an international database on intellectual property. Trends in patents issued in the United States and internationally were compared with lens use from 1950 through 2000. Patent trends were compared with lenses approved for commercial marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1978 through 2000.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1970 through 2000, the United States granted 855 patents for IOLs, far greater than the 316 patents issued internationally during the same period. Patents in the United States granted to individuals were merely 6% less than those issued to companies (404 vs 430); only 2.5% (21) were conferred to universities. Beginning in 1989, there was a marked shift in the number of patent rights to corporations rather than individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using patents as a surrogate for creativity in IOL development, the United States played a leading role in artificial lens design. Patents for IOLs first increased when the FDA was authorized to classify them as Class III medical devices, whereas the majority of ownerships shifted from individuals to companies after 1989. The near simultaneous rise in patentable lens innovations with IOL surgery maturating to the standard of care suggests both phenomena were products of earlier transformative events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"277 ","pages":"Pages 413-419"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intraocular Lenses―the Halcyon Years as Measured by Individual and Corporate Patentable Innovations\",\"authors\":\"Trevor Lin , Lynn E. Harman , Curtis E. Margo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.05.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To explore the contributions of individuals and corporate manufacturers to the design of artificial intraocular lenses (IOLs) conferred through patents.</div></div><div><h3>Perspective</h3><div>Historical review and analysis of IOL patents from 1950 through 2000.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The annual number of IOL patents granted to individuals and companies was obtained from an international database on intellectual property. Trends in patents issued in the United States and internationally were compared with lens use from 1950 through 2000. Patent trends were compared with lenses approved for commercial marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1978 through 2000.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 1970 through 2000, the United States granted 855 patents for IOLs, far greater than the 316 patents issued internationally during the same period. Patents in the United States granted to individuals were merely 6% less than those issued to companies (404 vs 430); only 2.5% (21) were conferred to universities. Beginning in 1989, there was a marked shift in the number of patent rights to corporations rather than individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using patents as a surrogate for creativity in IOL development, the United States played a leading role in artificial lens design. Patents for IOLs first increased when the FDA was authorized to classify them as Class III medical devices, whereas the majority of ownerships shifted from individuals to companies after 1989. The near simultaneous rise in patentable lens innovations with IOL surgery maturating to the standard of care suggests both phenomena were products of earlier transformative events.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"277 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 413-419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425002818\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425002818","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial Intraocular Lenses―the Halcyon Years as Measured by Individual and Corporate Patentable Innovations
Purpose
To explore the contributions of individuals and corporate manufacturers to the design of artificial intraocular lenses (IOLs) conferred through patents.
Perspective
Historical review and analysis of IOL patents from 1950 through 2000.
Methods
The annual number of IOL patents granted to individuals and companies was obtained from an international database on intellectual property. Trends in patents issued in the United States and internationally were compared with lens use from 1950 through 2000. Patent trends were compared with lenses approved for commercial marketing by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 1978 through 2000.
Results
From 1970 through 2000, the United States granted 855 patents for IOLs, far greater than the 316 patents issued internationally during the same period. Patents in the United States granted to individuals were merely 6% less than those issued to companies (404 vs 430); only 2.5% (21) were conferred to universities. Beginning in 1989, there was a marked shift in the number of patent rights to corporations rather than individuals.
Conclusions
Using patents as a surrogate for creativity in IOL development, the United States played a leading role in artificial lens design. Patents for IOLs first increased when the FDA was authorized to classify them as Class III medical devices, whereas the majority of ownerships shifted from individuals to companies after 1989. The near simultaneous rise in patentable lens innovations with IOL surgery maturating to the standard of care suggests both phenomena were products of earlier transformative events.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect.
The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.