{"title":"估算海洋和淡水棘鱼最近和历史的有效种群规模。","authors":"Xueyun Feng, Ari Löytynoja, Juha Merilä","doi":"10.1111/mec.17825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective population size (N<sub>e</sub>) is a quantity of central importance in evolutionary biology and population genetics, but often notoriously challenging to estimate. Analyses of N<sub>e</sub> are further complicated by the many interpretations of the concept and the alternative approaches to quantify N<sub>e</sub> utilising different properties of the data. Each method is also informative over different time scales, suggesting that a combination of approaches should allow piecing together the entire continuum of N<sub>e</sub>, spanning from the recent to more distant past. To test this in practice, we inferred the N<sub>e</sub> continuum for 45 populations of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) using whole-genome data with both LD- and coalescent-based methods. Our results show that marine populations exhibit the highest N<sub>e</sub> values in contemporary, recent, and historical times, followed by coastal and freshwater populations. The results also demonstrate the impact of both recent and historical gene flow on N<sub>e</sub> estimates and show that simple summary statistics are informative in comprehending the events in the very recent past and aid in more accurate estimation of <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>N</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>C</mi></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {N}_e^C $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , the contemporary N<sub>e</sub>, as well as in reconstruction and interpretation of recent demographic histories. Although our sample size for each large population is limited, we found that GONE can provide reasonable N<sub>e</sub> estimates. However, due to challenges in detecting subtle genetic drift in large populations, these estimates may represent the lower bound of N<sub>e</sub>. Finally, we show that combining GONE and CurrentNe2, both sensitive to population structure, with MSMC2 provides a meaningful interpretation of N<sub>e</sub> dynamics over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":210,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology","volume":" ","pages":"e17825"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating Recent and Historical Effective Population Size of Marine and Freshwater Sticklebacks.\",\"authors\":\"Xueyun Feng, Ari Löytynoja, Juha Merilä\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mec.17825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Effective population size (N<sub>e</sub>) is a quantity of central importance in evolutionary biology and population genetics, but often notoriously challenging to estimate. Analyses of N<sub>e</sub> are further complicated by the many interpretations of the concept and the alternative approaches to quantify N<sub>e</sub> utilising different properties of the data. Each method is also informative over different time scales, suggesting that a combination of approaches should allow piecing together the entire continuum of N<sub>e</sub>, spanning from the recent to more distant past. To test this in practice, we inferred the N<sub>e</sub> continuum for 45 populations of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) using whole-genome data with both LD- and coalescent-based methods. Our results show that marine populations exhibit the highest N<sub>e</sub> values in contemporary, recent, and historical times, followed by coastal and freshwater populations. The results also demonstrate the impact of both recent and historical gene flow on N<sub>e</sub> estimates and show that simple summary statistics are informative in comprehending the events in the very recent past and aid in more accurate estimation of <math> <semantics> <mrow><msubsup><mi>N</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mi>C</mi></msubsup> </mrow> <annotation>$$ {N}_e^C $$</annotation></semantics> </math> , the contemporary N<sub>e</sub>, as well as in reconstruction and interpretation of recent demographic histories. Although our sample size for each large population is limited, we found that GONE can provide reasonable N<sub>e</sub> estimates. However, due to challenges in detecting subtle genetic drift in large populations, these estimates may represent the lower bound of N<sub>e</sub>. Finally, we show that combining GONE and CurrentNe2, both sensitive to population structure, with MSMC2 provides a meaningful interpretation of N<sub>e</sub> dynamics over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Ecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e17825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17825\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.17825","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
有效种群大小(Ne)在进化生物学和种群遗传学中是一个非常重要的数量,但通常难以估计。由于对该概念的许多解释以及利用数据的不同属性来量化Ne的替代方法,对Ne的分析进一步复杂化。每种方法在不同的时间尺度上都能提供信息,这表明多种方法的结合应该可以拼凑出Ne的整个连续体,从最近到更遥远的过去。为了在实践中验证这一点,我们使用基于LD和聚结方法的全基因组数据推断了45个九刺棘鱼(Pungitius Pungitius)种群的Ne连续体。结果表明,海洋种群在当代、近期和历史时期的Ne值最高,其次是沿海和淡水种群。结果还证明了近期和历史基因流对Ne估计的影响,并表明简单的汇总统计有助于理解最近发生的事件,并有助于更准确地估计Ne - C $$ {N}_e^C $$,当代Ne,以及重建和解释最近的人口历史。虽然我们对每个大群体的样本量是有限的,但我们发现go可以提供合理的Ne估计。然而,由于在大群体中检测微妙的遗传漂变的挑战,这些估计可能代表了Ne的下限。最后,我们表明,将对种群结构敏感的go和CurrentNe2与MSMC2结合,可以对Ne随时间的动态进行有意义的解释。
Estimating Recent and Historical Effective Population Size of Marine and Freshwater Sticklebacks.
Effective population size (Ne) is a quantity of central importance in evolutionary biology and population genetics, but often notoriously challenging to estimate. Analyses of Ne are further complicated by the many interpretations of the concept and the alternative approaches to quantify Ne utilising different properties of the data. Each method is also informative over different time scales, suggesting that a combination of approaches should allow piecing together the entire continuum of Ne, spanning from the recent to more distant past. To test this in practice, we inferred the Ne continuum for 45 populations of nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) using whole-genome data with both LD- and coalescent-based methods. Our results show that marine populations exhibit the highest Ne values in contemporary, recent, and historical times, followed by coastal and freshwater populations. The results also demonstrate the impact of both recent and historical gene flow on Ne estimates and show that simple summary statistics are informative in comprehending the events in the very recent past and aid in more accurate estimation of , the contemporary Ne, as well as in reconstruction and interpretation of recent demographic histories. Although our sample size for each large population is limited, we found that GONE can provide reasonable Ne estimates. However, due to challenges in detecting subtle genetic drift in large populations, these estimates may represent the lower bound of Ne. Finally, we show that combining GONE and CurrentNe2, both sensitive to population structure, with MSMC2 provides a meaningful interpretation of Ne dynamics over time.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Ecology publishes papers that utilize molecular genetic techniques to address consequential questions in ecology, evolution, behaviour and conservation. Studies may employ neutral markers for inference about ecological and evolutionary processes or examine ecologically important genes and their products directly. We discourage papers that are primarily descriptive and are relevant only to the taxon being studied. Papers reporting on molecular marker development, molecular diagnostics, barcoding, or DNA taxonomy, or technical methods should be re-directed to our sister journal, Molecular Ecology Resources. Likewise, papers with a strongly applied focus should be submitted to Evolutionary Applications. Research areas of interest to Molecular Ecology include:
* population structure and phylogeography
* reproductive strategies
* relatedness and kin selection
* sex allocation
* population genetic theory
* analytical methods development
* conservation genetics
* speciation genetics
* microbial biodiversity
* evolutionary dynamics of QTLs
* ecological interactions
* molecular adaptation and environmental genomics
* impact of genetically modified organisms