阿拉伯联合酋长国小反刍动物布鲁氏菌感染的流行病学

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Gobena Ameni, Aboma Zewude, Berecha Bayissa, Ibrahim Abdalla Alfaki, Abdallah A. Albizreh, Naeema Alhosani, Meera Saeed Alkalbani, Mohamed Moustafa Abdelhalim, Assem Sobhi Abdelazim, Rafeek Aroul Koliyan, Kaltham Kayaf, Mervat Mari Al Nuaimat, Robert Barigye, Markos Tibbo, Yassir Mohammed Eltahir
{"title":"阿拉伯联合酋长国小反刍动物布鲁氏菌感染的流行病学","authors":"Gobena Ameni,&nbsp;Aboma Zewude,&nbsp;Berecha Bayissa,&nbsp;Ibrahim Abdalla Alfaki,&nbsp;Abdallah A. Albizreh,&nbsp;Naeema Alhosani,&nbsp;Meera Saeed Alkalbani,&nbsp;Mohamed Moustafa Abdelhalim,&nbsp;Assem Sobhi Abdelazim,&nbsp;Rafeek Aroul Koliyan,&nbsp;Kaltham Kayaf,&nbsp;Mervat Mari Al Nuaimat,&nbsp;Robert Barigye,&nbsp;Markos Tibbo,&nbsp;Yassir Mohammed Eltahir","doi":"10.1155/tbed/6666896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Small ruminants are important livestock species, which function as a major source of protein, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), although infections such as <i>Brucella</i> infection can hamper their productivity. However, there is currently a paucity of epidemiological data on <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants in the UAE. This study therefore aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of <i>Brucella</i> infection and evaluate the associated risk factors in 272 flocks encompassing 2730 small ruminants in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. In addition, DNA of the <i>Brucella</i> was tested in seropositive small ruminant. Multispecies competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and multispecies indirect ELISA (iELISA) were used to detect <i>Brucella</i> antibodies, while real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect the DNA of genus Brucella and its major species (<i>Brucella</i> (<i>B</i>.) <i>abortus</i>, <i>B. melitensis</i>, and <i>B. ovis</i>). Flock seroprevalences of <i>Brucella</i> infection were 13.6% (95% CI: 9.8%–18.3%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 20.3%–31.0%) based on iELISA and cELISA, respectively. While animal seroprevalences were 2.31% (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and 4.84% (95% CI: 4.1–5.7) on the basis of iELISA and cELISA, respectively. Flock seroprevalence was associated with flock size, whereas animal seroprevalence was associated with region, holding type, species, and age. The genus <i>Brucella</i> DNA was detected in the sera of 28.21% (11/39) of seropositive small ruminants. The 11 <i>Brucella</i> genus positive sera were further identified into three <i>B. ovis</i>, three mixed infections of <i>B. melitensis</i> with either <i>B. abortus</i> or <i>B. ovis</i>, two <i>B. melitensis</i>, and one <i>B. abortus</i>. While the remaining two were not positive for any of the three species. In conclusion, although animal seroprevalences were low by both ELISA tests, flock seroprevalences were relatively high. Besides, <i>B. melitensis</i> was the dominant species that was detected in the sera small ruminants posing zoonotic threat to the public. Therefore, the results of this study warrant for re-enforcement of the control and preventive measures of <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/6666896","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of Brucella Infection in Small Ruminants in the United Arab Emirates\",\"authors\":\"Gobena Ameni,&nbsp;Aboma Zewude,&nbsp;Berecha Bayissa,&nbsp;Ibrahim Abdalla Alfaki,&nbsp;Abdallah A. Albizreh,&nbsp;Naeema Alhosani,&nbsp;Meera Saeed Alkalbani,&nbsp;Mohamed Moustafa Abdelhalim,&nbsp;Assem Sobhi Abdelazim,&nbsp;Rafeek Aroul Koliyan,&nbsp;Kaltham Kayaf,&nbsp;Mervat Mari Al Nuaimat,&nbsp;Robert Barigye,&nbsp;Markos Tibbo,&nbsp;Yassir Mohammed Eltahir\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tbed/6666896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Small ruminants are important livestock species, which function as a major source of protein, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), although infections such as <i>Brucella</i> infection can hamper their productivity. However, there is currently a paucity of epidemiological data on <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants in the UAE. This study therefore aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of <i>Brucella</i> infection and evaluate the associated risk factors in 272 flocks encompassing 2730 small ruminants in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. In addition, DNA of the <i>Brucella</i> was tested in seropositive small ruminant. Multispecies competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and multispecies indirect ELISA (iELISA) were used to detect <i>Brucella</i> antibodies, while real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect the DNA of genus Brucella and its major species (<i>Brucella</i> (<i>B</i>.) <i>abortus</i>, <i>B. melitensis</i>, and <i>B. ovis</i>). Flock seroprevalences of <i>Brucella</i> infection were 13.6% (95% CI: 9.8%–18.3%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 20.3%–31.0%) based on iELISA and cELISA, respectively. While animal seroprevalences were 2.31% (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and 4.84% (95% CI: 4.1–5.7) on the basis of iELISA and cELISA, respectively. Flock seroprevalence was associated with flock size, whereas animal seroprevalence was associated with region, holding type, species, and age. The genus <i>Brucella</i> DNA was detected in the sera of 28.21% (11/39) of seropositive small ruminants. The 11 <i>Brucella</i> genus positive sera were further identified into three <i>B. ovis</i>, three mixed infections of <i>B. melitensis</i> with either <i>B. abortus</i> or <i>B. ovis</i>, two <i>B. melitensis</i>, and one <i>B. abortus</i>. While the remaining two were not positive for any of the three species. In conclusion, although animal seroprevalences were low by both ELISA tests, flock seroprevalences were relatively high. Besides, <i>B. melitensis</i> was the dominant species that was detected in the sera small ruminants posing zoonotic threat to the public. Therefore, the results of this study warrant for re-enforcement of the control and preventive measures of <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/6666896\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/6666896\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/6666896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE),小型反刍动物是重要的家畜物种,是蛋白质的主要来源,尽管布鲁氏菌感染等感染会阻碍它们的生产力。然而,目前在阿联酋的小反刍动物中缺乏布鲁氏菌感染的流行病学数据。因此,本研究旨在估计阿布扎比酋长国272群包括2730只小反刍动物的布鲁氏菌感染的血清患病率,并评估相关危险因素。此外,对血清学阳性的小反刍动物进行了布鲁氏菌DNA检测。采用多种竞争酶联免疫吸附法(cELISA)和多种间接ELISA法(iELISA)检测布鲁氏菌抗体,采用实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测布鲁氏菌属及其主要种(流产布鲁氏菌、melitensis布鲁氏菌和ovis布鲁氏菌)的DNA。基于iELISA和cELISA的布鲁氏菌感染群体血清患病率分别为13.6% (95% CI: 9.8% ~ 18.3%)和25.5% (95% CI: 20.3% ~ 31.0%)。而基于iELISA和cELISA的动物血清患病率分别为2.31% (95% CI: 1.8-2.9)和4.84% (95% CI: 4.1-5.7)。畜群血清阳性率与畜群大小有关,而动物血清阳性率与地区、饲养类型、物种和年龄有关。28.21%(11/39)的血清阳性小反刍动物血清中检出布鲁氏菌属DNA。11份布氏菌属阳性血清经进一步鉴定为3例猪布氏菌感染,3例猪布氏菌与流产布氏菌或猪布氏菌混合感染,2例猪布氏菌感染,1例流产布氏菌感染。而剩下的两个人对三种物种中的任何一种都没有阳性反应。综上所述,尽管两种酶联免疫吸附试验的动物血清患病率均较低,但群体血清患病率相对较高。此外,在对公众构成人畜共患威胁的血清小反刍动物中检出的优势种为羊分枝杆菌。因此,本研究结果为加强对小反刍动物布鲁氏菌感染的控制和预防措施提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epidemiology of Brucella Infection in Small Ruminants in the United Arab Emirates

Small ruminants are important livestock species, which function as a major source of protein, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), although infections such as Brucella infection can hamper their productivity. However, there is currently a paucity of epidemiological data on Brucella infections in small ruminants in the UAE. This study therefore aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of Brucella infection and evaluate the associated risk factors in 272 flocks encompassing 2730 small ruminants in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. In addition, DNA of the Brucella was tested in seropositive small ruminant. Multispecies competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and multispecies indirect ELISA (iELISA) were used to detect Brucella antibodies, while real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect the DNA of genus Brucella and its major species (Brucella (B.) abortus, B. melitensis, and B. ovis). Flock seroprevalences of Brucella infection were 13.6% (95% CI: 9.8%–18.3%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 20.3%–31.0%) based on iELISA and cELISA, respectively. While animal seroprevalences were 2.31% (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and 4.84% (95% CI: 4.1–5.7) on the basis of iELISA and cELISA, respectively. Flock seroprevalence was associated with flock size, whereas animal seroprevalence was associated with region, holding type, species, and age. The genus Brucella DNA was detected in the sera of 28.21% (11/39) of seropositive small ruminants. The 11 Brucella genus positive sera were further identified into three B. ovis, three mixed infections of B. melitensis with either B. abortus or B. ovis, two B. melitensis, and one B. abortus. While the remaining two were not positive for any of the three species. In conclusion, although animal seroprevalences were low by both ELISA tests, flock seroprevalences were relatively high. Besides, B. melitensis was the dominant species that was detected in the sera small ruminants posing zoonotic threat to the public. Therefore, the results of this study warrant for re-enforcement of the control and preventive measures of Brucella infections in small ruminants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 农林科学-传染病学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
350
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions): Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread. Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope. Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies. Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies). Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信