Gobena Ameni, Aboma Zewude, Berecha Bayissa, Ibrahim Abdalla Alfaki, Abdallah A. Albizreh, Naeema Alhosani, Meera Saeed Alkalbani, Mohamed Moustafa Abdelhalim, Assem Sobhi Abdelazim, Rafeek Aroul Koliyan, Kaltham Kayaf, Mervat Mari Al Nuaimat, Robert Barigye, Markos Tibbo, Yassir Mohammed Eltahir
{"title":"阿拉伯联合酋长国小反刍动物布鲁氏菌感染的流行病学","authors":"Gobena Ameni, Aboma Zewude, Berecha Bayissa, Ibrahim Abdalla Alfaki, Abdallah A. Albizreh, Naeema Alhosani, Meera Saeed Alkalbani, Mohamed Moustafa Abdelhalim, Assem Sobhi Abdelazim, Rafeek Aroul Koliyan, Kaltham Kayaf, Mervat Mari Al Nuaimat, Robert Barigye, Markos Tibbo, Yassir Mohammed Eltahir","doi":"10.1155/tbed/6666896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Small ruminants are important livestock species, which function as a major source of protein, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), although infections such as <i>Brucella</i> infection can hamper their productivity. However, there is currently a paucity of epidemiological data on <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants in the UAE. This study therefore aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of <i>Brucella</i> infection and evaluate the associated risk factors in 272 flocks encompassing 2730 small ruminants in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. In addition, DNA of the <i>Brucella</i> was tested in seropositive small ruminant. Multispecies competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and multispecies indirect ELISA (iELISA) were used to detect <i>Brucella</i> antibodies, while real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect the DNA of genus Brucella and its major species (<i>Brucella</i> (<i>B</i>.) <i>abortus</i>, <i>B. melitensis</i>, and <i>B. ovis</i>). Flock seroprevalences of <i>Brucella</i> infection were 13.6% (95% CI: 9.8%–18.3%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 20.3%–31.0%) based on iELISA and cELISA, respectively. While animal seroprevalences were 2.31% (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and 4.84% (95% CI: 4.1–5.7) on the basis of iELISA and cELISA, respectively. Flock seroprevalence was associated with flock size, whereas animal seroprevalence was associated with region, holding type, species, and age. The genus <i>Brucella</i> DNA was detected in the sera of 28.21% (11/39) of seropositive small ruminants. The 11 <i>Brucella</i> genus positive sera were further identified into three <i>B. ovis</i>, three mixed infections of <i>B. melitensis</i> with either <i>B. abortus</i> or <i>B. ovis</i>, two <i>B. melitensis</i>, and one <i>B. abortus</i>. While the remaining two were not positive for any of the three species. In conclusion, although animal seroprevalences were low by both ELISA tests, flock seroprevalences were relatively high. Besides, <i>B. melitensis</i> was the dominant species that was detected in the sera small ruminants posing zoonotic threat to the public. Therefore, the results of this study warrant for re-enforcement of the control and preventive measures of <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/6666896","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of Brucella Infection in Small Ruminants in the United Arab Emirates\",\"authors\":\"Gobena Ameni, Aboma Zewude, Berecha Bayissa, Ibrahim Abdalla Alfaki, Abdallah A. Albizreh, Naeema Alhosani, Meera Saeed Alkalbani, Mohamed Moustafa Abdelhalim, Assem Sobhi Abdelazim, Rafeek Aroul Koliyan, Kaltham Kayaf, Mervat Mari Al Nuaimat, Robert Barigye, Markos Tibbo, Yassir Mohammed Eltahir\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tbed/6666896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Small ruminants are important livestock species, which function as a major source of protein, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), although infections such as <i>Brucella</i> infection can hamper their productivity. However, there is currently a paucity of epidemiological data on <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants in the UAE. This study therefore aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of <i>Brucella</i> infection and evaluate the associated risk factors in 272 flocks encompassing 2730 small ruminants in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. In addition, DNA of the <i>Brucella</i> was tested in seropositive small ruminant. Multispecies competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and multispecies indirect ELISA (iELISA) were used to detect <i>Brucella</i> antibodies, while real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect the DNA of genus Brucella and its major species (<i>Brucella</i> (<i>B</i>.) <i>abortus</i>, <i>B. melitensis</i>, and <i>B. ovis</i>). Flock seroprevalences of <i>Brucella</i> infection were 13.6% (95% CI: 9.8%–18.3%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 20.3%–31.0%) based on iELISA and cELISA, respectively. While animal seroprevalences were 2.31% (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and 4.84% (95% CI: 4.1–5.7) on the basis of iELISA and cELISA, respectively. Flock seroprevalence was associated with flock size, whereas animal seroprevalence was associated with region, holding type, species, and age. The genus <i>Brucella</i> DNA was detected in the sera of 28.21% (11/39) of seropositive small ruminants. The 11 <i>Brucella</i> genus positive sera were further identified into three <i>B. ovis</i>, three mixed infections of <i>B. melitensis</i> with either <i>B. abortus</i> or <i>B. ovis</i>, two <i>B. melitensis</i>, and one <i>B. abortus</i>. While the remaining two were not positive for any of the three species. In conclusion, although animal seroprevalences were low by both ELISA tests, flock seroprevalences were relatively high. Besides, <i>B. melitensis</i> was the dominant species that was detected in the sera small ruminants posing zoonotic threat to the public. Therefore, the results of this study warrant for re-enforcement of the control and preventive measures of <i>Brucella</i> infections in small ruminants.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/6666896\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/6666896\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/6666896","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epidemiology of Brucella Infection in Small Ruminants in the United Arab Emirates
Small ruminants are important livestock species, which function as a major source of protein, in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), although infections such as Brucella infection can hamper their productivity. However, there is currently a paucity of epidemiological data on Brucella infections in small ruminants in the UAE. This study therefore aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of Brucella infection and evaluate the associated risk factors in 272 flocks encompassing 2730 small ruminants in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi. In addition, DNA of the Brucella was tested in seropositive small ruminant. Multispecies competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and multispecies indirect ELISA (iELISA) were used to detect Brucella antibodies, while real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was used to detect the DNA of genus Brucella and its major species (Brucella (B.) abortus, B. melitensis, and B. ovis). Flock seroprevalences of Brucella infection were 13.6% (95% CI: 9.8%–18.3%) and 25.5% (95% CI: 20.3%–31.0%) based on iELISA and cELISA, respectively. While animal seroprevalences were 2.31% (95% CI: 1.8–2.9) and 4.84% (95% CI: 4.1–5.7) on the basis of iELISA and cELISA, respectively. Flock seroprevalence was associated with flock size, whereas animal seroprevalence was associated with region, holding type, species, and age. The genus Brucella DNA was detected in the sera of 28.21% (11/39) of seropositive small ruminants. The 11 Brucella genus positive sera were further identified into three B. ovis, three mixed infections of B. melitensis with either B. abortus or B. ovis, two B. melitensis, and one B. abortus. While the remaining two were not positive for any of the three species. In conclusion, although animal seroprevalences were low by both ELISA tests, flock seroprevalences were relatively high. Besides, B. melitensis was the dominant species that was detected in the sera small ruminants posing zoonotic threat to the public. Therefore, the results of this study warrant for re-enforcement of the control and preventive measures of Brucella infections in small ruminants.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.