不同加固策略对骨质疏松性胸腰椎融合术后近端关节后凸的生物力学分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Gaiping Zhao, Jiancheng Ren, Shenglan He, Eryun Chen, Tong Ma, Wentao Yan, Kunneng Wu, Jie Wu
{"title":"不同加固策略对骨质疏松性胸腰椎融合术后近端关节后凸的生物力学分析","authors":"Gaiping Zhao,&nbsp;Jiancheng Ren,&nbsp;Shenglan He,&nbsp;Eryun Chen,&nbsp;Tong Ma,&nbsp;Wentao Yan,&nbsp;Kunneng Wu,&nbsp;Jie Wu","doi":"10.1002/cnm.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in osteoporotic thoracolumbar fusion patients require further exploration, particularly regarding the efficacy of different strengthening strategies such as vertebral augmentation (VA) and ligament tethers (TE). The effects of three strengthening strategies: double-segment VA (T7&amp;T8VA), three-level posterior TE (T6-T9TE), and combination of VA with TE (VATE) were compared in osteoporotic patients using a thoracolumbar T1-L5 finite element model to assess the impact on mechanical transfer to proximal vertebrae, intervertebral disc stress, and loads on the pedicle screw system. The ratios of maximum von Mises stress at the T7 in the posterior thoracolumbar fusion (PTCF), T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE models were 1:0.87:0.75:0.64, 1:0.98:0.35:0.33, 1:0.96:0.89:0.86, and 1:0.99:0.97:0.95 for the mild osteoporotic models during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. Compared with the PTCF model, T7/T8 IVD maximum stresses in T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE models were decreased by 7.08%, −0.38%, 4.42%, −0.67%; 27.7%, 72.72%, 8.97%, 0.17%; and 34.51%, 73.61%, 12.57%, −0.36% under identical conditions. The stresses at SCR8 in T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE increased over the PTCF model by 2.66%, 8.23%, 1.80% and 1.26%, 1.64%, 2.72% during flexion and rotation, respectively, and decreased by 3.40%, 32.92%, 34.06% and 4.61%, 7.37%, 11.07% during extension and lateral bending, respectively. In both mild and severe osteoporotic models, the strengthening methods of T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE exhibited similar trends of changes, but the stress values were significantly higher in the latter. The combination of T7&amp;T8VA with T6-T9TE is more effective in preventing PJK after posterior long-segment T8-L5 fusion surgery than using T7&amp;T8VA alone or T6-T9TE alone for osteoporotic patients. Simulation results can provide theoretical foundations and assist surgeons in selecting the appropriate operation scheme to prevent PJK for osteoporotic patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"41 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fusion With Different Reinforcement Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Gaiping Zhao,&nbsp;Jiancheng Ren,&nbsp;Shenglan He,&nbsp;Eryun Chen,&nbsp;Tong Ma,&nbsp;Wentao Yan,&nbsp;Kunneng Wu,&nbsp;Jie Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cnm.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in osteoporotic thoracolumbar fusion patients require further exploration, particularly regarding the efficacy of different strengthening strategies such as vertebral augmentation (VA) and ligament tethers (TE). The effects of three strengthening strategies: double-segment VA (T7&amp;T8VA), three-level posterior TE (T6-T9TE), and combination of VA with TE (VATE) were compared in osteoporotic patients using a thoracolumbar T1-L5 finite element model to assess the impact on mechanical transfer to proximal vertebrae, intervertebral disc stress, and loads on the pedicle screw system. The ratios of maximum von Mises stress at the T7 in the posterior thoracolumbar fusion (PTCF), T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE models were 1:0.87:0.75:0.64, 1:0.98:0.35:0.33, 1:0.96:0.89:0.86, and 1:0.99:0.97:0.95 for the mild osteoporotic models during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. Compared with the PTCF model, T7/T8 IVD maximum stresses in T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE models were decreased by 7.08%, −0.38%, 4.42%, −0.67%; 27.7%, 72.72%, 8.97%, 0.17%; and 34.51%, 73.61%, 12.57%, −0.36% under identical conditions. The stresses at SCR8 in T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE increased over the PTCF model by 2.66%, 8.23%, 1.80% and 1.26%, 1.64%, 2.72% during flexion and rotation, respectively, and decreased by 3.40%, 32.92%, 34.06% and 4.61%, 7.37%, 11.07% during extension and lateral bending, respectively. In both mild and severe osteoporotic models, the strengthening methods of T7&amp;T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE exhibited similar trends of changes, but the stress values were significantly higher in the latter. The combination of T7&amp;T8VA with T6-T9TE is more effective in preventing PJK after posterior long-segment T8-L5 fusion surgery than using T7&amp;T8VA alone or T6-T9TE alone for osteoporotic patients. Simulation results can provide theoretical foundations and assist surgeons in selecting the appropriate operation scheme to prevent PJK for osteoporotic patients.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.70056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨质疏松性胸腰椎融合患者近端关节后凸(PJK)的生物力学有待进一步研究,特别是不同强化策略的疗效,如椎体增强术(VA)和韧带系扎术(TE)。采用胸腰椎T1-L5有限元模型,比较三种强化策略:双节段椎弓根内固定(t7 & T8VA)、三节段后路椎弓根内固定(T6-T9TE)、椎弓根内固定联合椎弓根内固定(VATE)在骨质疏松症患者中的效果,以评估椎弓根内固定对近端椎体机械转移、椎间盘应力和椎弓根螺钉系统负荷的影响。轻度骨质疏松模型在屈伸、侧弯和轴向旋转时T7、T7& T8VA、T6-T9TE和VATE模型的最大von Mises应力比值分别为1:0.87:0.75:0.64、1:0.98:0.35:0.33、1:0.96:0.89:0.86和1:0.99:0.97:0.95。与PTCF模型相比,T7&;T8VA、T6-T9TE和VATE模型的T7/T8 IVD最大应力分别降低了7.08%、- 0.38%、4.42%、- 0.67%;27.7%, 72.72%, 8.97%, 0.17%;相同条件下分别为34.51%、73.61%、12.57%、−0.36%。与PTCF模型相比,t7、T8VA、T6-T9TE和VATE模型的SCR8应力在屈曲和旋转过程中分别增加了2.66%、8.23%、1.80%和1.26%、1.64%、2.72%,在伸展和侧弯过程中分别减少了3.40%、32.92%、34.06%和4.61%、7.37%、11.07%。在轻度和重度骨质疏松模型中,t7 & T8VA、T6-T9TE和VATE的强化方法变化趋势相似,但后者的应力值明显更高。对于骨质疏松患者,t7 & T8VA联合T6-T9TE比单独使用t7 & T8VA或单独使用T6-T9TE更能有效预防后路长段T8-L5融合术后PJK的发生。模拟结果可以提供理论依据,帮助外科医生选择合适的手术方案,预防骨质疏松患者的PJK。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fusion With Different Reinforcement Strategies

Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fusion With Different Reinforcement Strategies

The biomechanics of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in osteoporotic thoracolumbar fusion patients require further exploration, particularly regarding the efficacy of different strengthening strategies such as vertebral augmentation (VA) and ligament tethers (TE). The effects of three strengthening strategies: double-segment VA (T7&T8VA), three-level posterior TE (T6-T9TE), and combination of VA with TE (VATE) were compared in osteoporotic patients using a thoracolumbar T1-L5 finite element model to assess the impact on mechanical transfer to proximal vertebrae, intervertebral disc stress, and loads on the pedicle screw system. The ratios of maximum von Mises stress at the T7 in the posterior thoracolumbar fusion (PTCF), T7&T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE models were 1:0.87:0.75:0.64, 1:0.98:0.35:0.33, 1:0.96:0.89:0.86, and 1:0.99:0.97:0.95 for the mild osteoporotic models during flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. Compared with the PTCF model, T7/T8 IVD maximum stresses in T7&T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE models were decreased by 7.08%, −0.38%, 4.42%, −0.67%; 27.7%, 72.72%, 8.97%, 0.17%; and 34.51%, 73.61%, 12.57%, −0.36% under identical conditions. The stresses at SCR8 in T7&T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE increased over the PTCF model by 2.66%, 8.23%, 1.80% and 1.26%, 1.64%, 2.72% during flexion and rotation, respectively, and decreased by 3.40%, 32.92%, 34.06% and 4.61%, 7.37%, 11.07% during extension and lateral bending, respectively. In both mild and severe osteoporotic models, the strengthening methods of T7&T8VA, T6-T9TE, and VATE exhibited similar trends of changes, but the stress values were significantly higher in the latter. The combination of T7&T8VA with T6-T9TE is more effective in preventing PJK after posterior long-segment T8-L5 fusion surgery than using T7&T8VA alone or T6-T9TE alone for osteoporotic patients. Simulation results can provide theoretical foundations and assist surgeons in selecting the appropriate operation scheme to prevent PJK for osteoporotic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信