阿巴拉契亚中部极端天气事件和风险沟通挑战:一项定性调查

IF 2.6 3区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Azmat Khan, Amy E. Chadwick, Natalie Kruse Daniels, Geoffrey D. Dabelko, Leigh-Anne Krometis, Jamie E. Shinn, Amy J. Lynch, Emily Garner, William Cully Hession, Jen Bowman
{"title":"阿巴拉契亚中部极端天气事件和风险沟通挑战:一项定性调查","authors":"Azmat Khan,&nbsp;Amy E. Chadwick,&nbsp;Natalie Kruse Daniels,&nbsp;Geoffrey D. Dabelko,&nbsp;Leigh-Anne Krometis,&nbsp;Jamie E. Shinn,&nbsp;Amy J. Lynch,&nbsp;Emily Garner,&nbsp;William Cully Hession,&nbsp;Jen Bowman","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study inventories and identifies communication challenges faced by emergency management agencies in Central Appalachia as they engage communities in preparation, response and recovery efforts for extreme weather events (EWEs). Drawing on data from nine group discussions and guided by the Social Ecological Model, the analysis discerned an array of barriers to effective risk communication, originating from cultural, organizational, interpersonal and individual dynamics. It was found that a pervasive distrust of emergency agencies and broader climate governance, articulated through the notion of ‘mining,’ undermines organizational legitimacy. Conflicting messages from emergency sources with ambiguous or overlapping roles create confusion, numb and desensitize populations, and further erode source credibility. Poor internet and cellular connectivity constrain timely information delivery and exacerbate vulnerabilities. Additionally, the region's ingrained culture of ‘riding-it-out’, while a valuable source of organic resilience and self-efficacy, is seen by some emergency managers as ‘stubbornness,’ which leads to misalignment in risk communication. This study re-contextualizes these cultural attributes as essential ‘social capital’ and offers strategies to align communication practices and resources with local identity and agency needs. Findings contribute to culturally responsive approaches to participatory risk communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.70057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extreme Weather Events and Risk Communication Challenges in Central Appalachia: A Qualitative Inquiry\",\"authors\":\"Azmat Khan,&nbsp;Amy E. Chadwick,&nbsp;Natalie Kruse Daniels,&nbsp;Geoffrey D. Dabelko,&nbsp;Leigh-Anne Krometis,&nbsp;Jamie E. Shinn,&nbsp;Amy J. Lynch,&nbsp;Emily Garner,&nbsp;William Cully Hession,&nbsp;Jen Bowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-5973.70057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study inventories and identifies communication challenges faced by emergency management agencies in Central Appalachia as they engage communities in preparation, response and recovery efforts for extreme weather events (EWEs). Drawing on data from nine group discussions and guided by the Social Ecological Model, the analysis discerned an array of barriers to effective risk communication, originating from cultural, organizational, interpersonal and individual dynamics. It was found that a pervasive distrust of emergency agencies and broader climate governance, articulated through the notion of ‘mining,’ undermines organizational legitimacy. Conflicting messages from emergency sources with ambiguous or overlapping roles create confusion, numb and desensitize populations, and further erode source credibility. Poor internet and cellular connectivity constrain timely information delivery and exacerbate vulnerabilities. Additionally, the region's ingrained culture of ‘riding-it-out’, while a valuable source of organic resilience and self-efficacy, is seen by some emergency managers as ‘stubbornness,’ which leads to misalignment in risk communication. This study re-contextualizes these cultural attributes as essential ‘social capital’ and offers strategies to align communication practices and resources with local identity and agency needs. Findings contribute to culturally responsive approaches to participatory risk communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.70057\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.70057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究列出并确定了阿巴拉契亚中部应急管理机构在动员社区参与极端天气事件(ewe)的准备、响应和恢复工作时面临的沟通挑战。在社会生态模型的指导下,利用9次小组讨论的数据,分析发现了一系列阻碍有效风险沟通的障碍,这些障碍来自文化、组织、人际和个人动态。研究发现,对紧急机构和更广泛的气候治理的普遍不信任,通过“采矿”的概念表达,破坏了组织的合法性。来自角色模糊或重叠的应急来源的相互矛盾的信息造成混乱,使民众麻木和麻木,并进一步削弱来源的可信度。糟糕的互联网和蜂窝连接限制了信息的及时传递,并加剧了漏洞。此外,该地区根深蒂固的“忍耐”文化,虽然是有机弹性和自我效能的宝贵来源,但被一些应急管理人员视为“固执”,导致风险沟通不一致。本研究将这些文化属性重新定位为基本的“社会资本”,并提供了将沟通实践和资源与当地身份和机构需求相结合的策略。研究结果有助于对参与性风险沟通的文化响应方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extreme Weather Events and Risk Communication Challenges in Central Appalachia: A Qualitative Inquiry

This study inventories and identifies communication challenges faced by emergency management agencies in Central Appalachia as they engage communities in preparation, response and recovery efforts for extreme weather events (EWEs). Drawing on data from nine group discussions and guided by the Social Ecological Model, the analysis discerned an array of barriers to effective risk communication, originating from cultural, organizational, interpersonal and individual dynamics. It was found that a pervasive distrust of emergency agencies and broader climate governance, articulated through the notion of ‘mining,’ undermines organizational legitimacy. Conflicting messages from emergency sources with ambiguous or overlapping roles create confusion, numb and desensitize populations, and further erode source credibility. Poor internet and cellular connectivity constrain timely information delivery and exacerbate vulnerabilities. Additionally, the region's ingrained culture of ‘riding-it-out’, while a valuable source of organic resilience and self-efficacy, is seen by some emergency managers as ‘stubbornness,’ which leads to misalignment in risk communication. This study re-contextualizes these cultural attributes as essential ‘social capital’ and offers strategies to align communication practices and resources with local identity and agency needs. Findings contribute to culturally responsive approaches to participatory risk communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信