设计暴雨雨量图在城市洪水风险管理和排水系统设计中的重要性

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Egle Saaremäe, Ottar Tamm, Harri Koivusalo, Toomas Tamm
{"title":"设计暴雨雨量图在城市洪水风险管理和排水系统设计中的重要性","authors":"Egle Saaremäe,&nbsp;Ottar Tamm,&nbsp;Harri Koivusalo,&nbsp;Toomas Tamm","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is an urgent need to assess the uncertainties in stormwater pipe design owing to the increasing occurrence of urban floods triggered by urbanisation and climate change. The design storm concept involves determining the event duration and corresponding depth. Various design hyetograph methods are available to partition the design storm depth into segments, which raises questions about their impact on stormwater system design. This study analysed an ensemble of eight widely used hyetograph methods, including triangular, linear/exponential, Chicago and alternating block, in industrial and residential urban catchments using the stormwater management model. The modelling results revealed clear disparities between hyetograph methods in terms of catchment hydrological response. Depending on the method used, the simulated outlet peak flow varied by ±30% in both catchments. As a result, outlet pipe sizes varied by one and two increments in the residential and industrial catchments, respectively. Almost no flooding was evident in the manholes using simple single-point hyetographs, whereas a quarter of the manholes showed flooding with more complex multipoint methods. Results underline the presence of high uncertainty in design flow estimates. Multipoint hyetograph methods should be used for designing critical infrastructure to minimise flooding risk if no local or regional data are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Importance of Design Storm Hyetograph on Urban Flood Risk Management and Drainage System Design\",\"authors\":\"Egle Saaremäe,&nbsp;Ottar Tamm,&nbsp;Harri Koivusalo,&nbsp;Toomas Tamm\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is an urgent need to assess the uncertainties in stormwater pipe design owing to the increasing occurrence of urban floods triggered by urbanisation and climate change. The design storm concept involves determining the event duration and corresponding depth. Various design hyetograph methods are available to partition the design storm depth into segments, which raises questions about their impact on stormwater system design. This study analysed an ensemble of eight widely used hyetograph methods, including triangular, linear/exponential, Chicago and alternating block, in industrial and residential urban catchments using the stormwater management model. The modelling results revealed clear disparities between hyetograph methods in terms of catchment hydrological response. Depending on the method used, the simulated outlet peak flow varied by ±30% in both catchments. As a result, outlet pipe sizes varied by one and two increments in the residential and industrial catchments, respectively. Almost no flooding was evident in the manholes using simple single-point hyetographs, whereas a quarter of the manholes showed flooding with more complex multipoint methods. Results underline the presence of high uncertainty in design flow estimates. Multipoint hyetograph methods should be used for designing critical infrastructure to minimise flooding risk if no local or regional data are available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于城市化和气候变化引发的城市洪水日益频繁,迫切需要对雨水管道设计中的不确定性进行评估。设计风暴的概念包括确定事件持续时间和相应的深度。不同的设计雨量计方法可以将设计暴雨深度划分成不同的部分,这就提出了它们对雨水系统设计的影响的问题。本研究使用雨水管理模型分析了工业和住宅城市集水区中广泛使用的八种集水图方法,包括三角形、线性/指数、芝加哥和交替块。模拟结果显示,在流域水文响应方面,不同的水文测量方法之间存在明显差异。根据使用的方法,两个集水区的模拟出口峰值流量变化了±30%。因此,住宅和工业集水区的出口管道尺寸分别增加了一个和两个增量。使用简单的单点湿度计,人孔中几乎没有明显的水浸,而使用更复杂的多点方法,四分之一的人孔显示有水浸。结果强调了设计流估计中存在的高度不确定性。在没有本地或区域数据的情况下,应采用多点雨量记录法设计关键基础设施,以尽量减少洪水风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Importance of Design Storm Hyetograph on Urban Flood Risk Management and Drainage System Design

There is an urgent need to assess the uncertainties in stormwater pipe design owing to the increasing occurrence of urban floods triggered by urbanisation and climate change. The design storm concept involves determining the event duration and corresponding depth. Various design hyetograph methods are available to partition the design storm depth into segments, which raises questions about their impact on stormwater system design. This study analysed an ensemble of eight widely used hyetograph methods, including triangular, linear/exponential, Chicago and alternating block, in industrial and residential urban catchments using the stormwater management model. The modelling results revealed clear disparities between hyetograph methods in terms of catchment hydrological response. Depending on the method used, the simulated outlet peak flow varied by ±30% in both catchments. As a result, outlet pipe sizes varied by one and two increments in the residential and industrial catchments, respectively. Almost no flooding was evident in the manholes using simple single-point hyetographs, whereas a quarter of the manholes showed flooding with more complex multipoint methods. Results underline the presence of high uncertainty in design flow estimates. Multipoint hyetograph methods should be used for designing critical infrastructure to minimise flooding risk if no local or regional data are available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信