模拟近场气溶胶暴露用于呼吸道感染风险评估

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Indoor air Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1155/ina/5571740
Christiaan J. E. Delmaar, Lucie C. Vermeulen, Jack F. Schijven
{"title":"模拟近场气溶胶暴露用于呼吸道感染风险评估","authors":"Christiaan J. E. Delmaar,&nbsp;Lucie C. Vermeulen,&nbsp;Jack F. Schijven","doi":"10.1155/ina/5571740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) is a method to estimate the risk of infectious disease transmission from human exposure to pathogens. QMRA is a helpful tool to inform health policies to control the impact of infectious disease transmission from human-to-human transmissible infectious respiratory diseases. QMRA combines an estimate of pathogen exposure with information on the probability of infection given the dose. The infection risk of respiratory diseases is generally assumed to depend on the interpersonal distance between the infectious person (index) and the exposed recipient. To account for close-proximity exposure in QMRA, specific generic models are required. To be helpful in policy information, these models should be sufficiently accurate in describing elevated air concentrations of pathogens near the index. On the other hand, they should be sufficiently generic and flexible to be applied in generalized situations without requiring very specific and detailed situational information. In this work, we identified different models to account for near-field exposure in the literature: multizone, diffusion, and jet models. These methods were tested with respect to their applicability in QMRA. We evaluated them on the criteria of ease of use, the availability of parameter values for generic application, and their ability to describe air concentrations in realistic situations as replicated in experiments. It was found that only diffusion modelling appeared to be both flexible enough to describe experimental data and to be supported by sufficient information to allow for parametrization in a wide variety of situations. The multizone models were found to be easy to use but difficult to parametrize given the arbitrariness of aspects of the modelling method. The jet models were found to be more complex to implement and adapt to specific exposure scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":13529,"journal":{"name":"Indoor air","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/5571740","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling Near-Field Aerosol Exposure for Respiratory Infection Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Christiaan J. E. Delmaar,&nbsp;Lucie C. Vermeulen,&nbsp;Jack F. Schijven\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ina/5571740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) is a method to estimate the risk of infectious disease transmission from human exposure to pathogens. QMRA is a helpful tool to inform health policies to control the impact of infectious disease transmission from human-to-human transmissible infectious respiratory diseases. QMRA combines an estimate of pathogen exposure with information on the probability of infection given the dose. The infection risk of respiratory diseases is generally assumed to depend on the interpersonal distance between the infectious person (index) and the exposed recipient. To account for close-proximity exposure in QMRA, specific generic models are required. To be helpful in policy information, these models should be sufficiently accurate in describing elevated air concentrations of pathogens near the index. On the other hand, they should be sufficiently generic and flexible to be applied in generalized situations without requiring very specific and detailed situational information. In this work, we identified different models to account for near-field exposure in the literature: multizone, diffusion, and jet models. These methods were tested with respect to their applicability in QMRA. We evaluated them on the criteria of ease of use, the availability of parameter values for generic application, and their ability to describe air concentrations in realistic situations as replicated in experiments. It was found that only diffusion modelling appeared to be both flexible enough to describe experimental data and to be supported by sufficient information to allow for parametrization in a wide variety of situations. The multizone models were found to be easy to use but difficult to parametrize given the arbitrariness of aspects of the modelling method. The jet models were found to be more complex to implement and adapt to specific exposure scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor air\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ina/5571740\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/5571740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor air","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ina/5571740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)是一种评估人类接触病原体传播传染病风险的方法。QMRA是一个有用的工具,为卫生政策提供信息,以控制传染病从人际传播的传染性呼吸系统疾病的影响。QMRA将病原体暴露的估计与给定剂量的感染概率信息相结合。一般认为呼吸道疾病的感染风险取决于感染者(指数)与接触者之间的人际距离。为了解释QMRA中的近距离暴露,需要特定的通用模型。为了在政策信息方面有所帮助,这些模型在描述该指数附近空气中病原体浓度升高时应该足够准确。另一方面,它们应该具有足够的通用性和灵活性,以便在一般情况下应用,而不需要非常具体和详细的情景信息。在这项工作中,我们确定了不同的模型来解释文献中的近场暴露:多区,扩散和射流模型。对这些方法在QMRA中的适用性进行了测试。我们根据易用性、参数值的可用性以及它们在实验中复制的实际情况下描述空气浓度的能力等标准对它们进行了评估。人们发现,只有扩散模型似乎既足够灵活,可以描述实验数据,又有足够的信息支持,以便在各种各样的情况下进行参数化。发现多区模型易于使用,但由于建模方法各方面的随意性,难于参数化。研究发现,喷气模型在实施和适应特定暴露情景时更为复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modelling Near-Field Aerosol Exposure for Respiratory Infection Risk Assessment

Quantitative microbiological risk assessment (QMRA) is a method to estimate the risk of infectious disease transmission from human exposure to pathogens. QMRA is a helpful tool to inform health policies to control the impact of infectious disease transmission from human-to-human transmissible infectious respiratory diseases. QMRA combines an estimate of pathogen exposure with information on the probability of infection given the dose. The infection risk of respiratory diseases is generally assumed to depend on the interpersonal distance between the infectious person (index) and the exposed recipient. To account for close-proximity exposure in QMRA, specific generic models are required. To be helpful in policy information, these models should be sufficiently accurate in describing elevated air concentrations of pathogens near the index. On the other hand, they should be sufficiently generic and flexible to be applied in generalized situations without requiring very specific and detailed situational information. In this work, we identified different models to account for near-field exposure in the literature: multizone, diffusion, and jet models. These methods were tested with respect to their applicability in QMRA. We evaluated them on the criteria of ease of use, the availability of parameter values for generic application, and their ability to describe air concentrations in realistic situations as replicated in experiments. It was found that only diffusion modelling appeared to be both flexible enough to describe experimental data and to be supported by sufficient information to allow for parametrization in a wide variety of situations. The multizone models were found to be easy to use but difficult to parametrize given the arbitrariness of aspects of the modelling method. The jet models were found to be more complex to implement and adapt to specific exposure scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indoor air
Indoor air 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The quality of the environment within buildings is a topic of major importance for public health. Indoor Air provides a location for reporting original research results in the broad area defined by the indoor environment of non-industrial buildings. An international journal with multidisciplinary content, Indoor Air publishes papers reflecting the broad categories of interest in this field: health effects; thermal comfort; monitoring and modelling; source characterization; ventilation and other environmental control techniques. The research results present the basic information to allow designers, building owners, and operators to provide a healthy and comfortable environment for building occupants, as well as giving medical practitioners information on how to deal with illnesses related to the indoor environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信