基于试验的不同施工方法隧道连接处三维渗流研究

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Helin Fu , Kaixun Hu , Yimin Wu , Weiguo He
{"title":"基于试验的不同施工方法隧道连接处三维渗流研究","authors":"Helin Fu ,&nbsp;Kaixun Hu ,&nbsp;Yimin Wu ,&nbsp;Weiguo He","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Composite construction methods may be adopted in some underwater tunnels due to complex geological conditions. However, the seepage field at the junction between parts constructed by different methods has been rarely reported. This study used the Pearl River Estuary Tunnel as a case study to conduct model experiments on the connection part and its adjacent mining and shield parts, which have different drainage systems. Through model experiments, the study explored the variation laws of water inflow and external water pressure on the tunnel lining. The experimental results were validated against numerical simulations. The results indicate that, longitudinally, the junction experiences pressure fluctuations due to variations in construction methods and tunnel cross-sectional dimensions. A logistic fit of the experimental data shows that fluctuations range from 12 to 21 m in the mining part and from 27 to 42 m in the shield part. The longitudinal distributions indicate that water pressure remains stable in the shield part, while in both the connection and mining parts it is influenced by the drainage pipes. Transversely, water pressure increases from the arch crown to the arch bottom, forming an approximately circular distribution. Both water pressure and inflow increase linearly with rising water levels. A comparison between experimental and simulation results shows a relative error of less than 9 %, confirming the accuracy of the experimental model. The study’s findings provide deeper insight into the seepage field at the junction of underwater tunnel parts, with implications for the design and construction of similar projects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 106773"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiment-based study on three dimensional seepage at tunnel junction of parts constructed by different methods\",\"authors\":\"Helin Fu ,&nbsp;Kaixun Hu ,&nbsp;Yimin Wu ,&nbsp;Weiguo He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Composite construction methods may be adopted in some underwater tunnels due to complex geological conditions. However, the seepage field at the junction between parts constructed by different methods has been rarely reported. This study used the Pearl River Estuary Tunnel as a case study to conduct model experiments on the connection part and its adjacent mining and shield parts, which have different drainage systems. Through model experiments, the study explored the variation laws of water inflow and external water pressure on the tunnel lining. The experimental results were validated against numerical simulations. The results indicate that, longitudinally, the junction experiences pressure fluctuations due to variations in construction methods and tunnel cross-sectional dimensions. A logistic fit of the experimental data shows that fluctuations range from 12 to 21 m in the mining part and from 27 to 42 m in the shield part. The longitudinal distributions indicate that water pressure remains stable in the shield part, while in both the connection and mining parts it is influenced by the drainage pipes. Transversely, water pressure increases from the arch crown to the arch bottom, forming an approximately circular distribution. Both water pressure and inflow increase linearly with rising water levels. A comparison between experimental and simulation results shows a relative error of less than 9 %, confirming the accuracy of the experimental model. The study’s findings provide deeper insight into the seepage field at the junction of underwater tunnel parts, with implications for the design and construction of similar projects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825004110\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825004110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于某些水下隧道地质条件复杂,可采用组合施工方法。然而,对于不同施工方法施工部位之间的渗流场,文献报道甚少。本研究以珠江口隧道为例,对具有不同排水系统的连接部分及其邻近的采矿和盾构部分进行了模型试验。通过模型试验,探讨了隧洞衬砌上涌水量和外水压的变化规律。通过数值模拟对实验结果进行了验证。结果表明,在纵向上,由于施工方法和隧道截面尺寸的变化,结体会经历压力波动。实验数据的logistic拟合表明,采掘部分波动范围为12 ~ 21 m,盾构部分波动范围为27 ~ 42 m。纵向分布表明,盾构部分水压保持稳定,而连接部分和采掘部分水压均受排水管道的影响。横向上,水压力从拱顶到拱底逐渐增大,呈近似圆形分布。水压和流入都随着水位的上升而线性增加。实验结果与仿真结果的对比表明,相对误差小于9%,验证了实验模型的准确性。研究结果对水下隧道连接处的渗流场有了更深入的认识,对类似工程的设计和施工具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiment-based study on three dimensional seepage at tunnel junction of parts constructed by different methods
Composite construction methods may be adopted in some underwater tunnels due to complex geological conditions. However, the seepage field at the junction between parts constructed by different methods has been rarely reported. This study used the Pearl River Estuary Tunnel as a case study to conduct model experiments on the connection part and its adjacent mining and shield parts, which have different drainage systems. Through model experiments, the study explored the variation laws of water inflow and external water pressure on the tunnel lining. The experimental results were validated against numerical simulations. The results indicate that, longitudinally, the junction experiences pressure fluctuations due to variations in construction methods and tunnel cross-sectional dimensions. A logistic fit of the experimental data shows that fluctuations range from 12 to 21 m in the mining part and from 27 to 42 m in the shield part. The longitudinal distributions indicate that water pressure remains stable in the shield part, while in both the connection and mining parts it is influenced by the drainage pipes. Transversely, water pressure increases from the arch crown to the arch bottom, forming an approximately circular distribution. Both water pressure and inflow increase linearly with rising water levels. A comparison between experimental and simulation results shows a relative error of less than 9 %, confirming the accuracy of the experimental model. The study’s findings provide deeper insight into the seepage field at the junction of underwater tunnel parts, with implications for the design and construction of similar projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信