{"title":"预测sCO2-PCHEs非设计性能的最佳机器学习方法的指导性研究","authors":"Xin Sui , Wenqi Wang , Chunyang Liu , Peixin Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As research increasingly focuses on predicting the off-design performance of PCHEs using machine learning (ML) approaches, there is a clear need to identify the most cost-effective method that offers optimal accuracy and generalization across a wide range of operating conditions in sCO<sub>2</sub> power cycles. In response, this study establishes highly accurate machine learning proxies, including XGBoost, SVMs, BPNNs, and FCDNs for comparison, aiming to rank and identify the one with the best accuracy and generalization for different operating conditions of PCHEs. First, multiple datasets concerning the geometric parameters and working conditions of PCHEs are consolidated. Two data-driven techniques are introduced to correlate both inputs and outputs, identifying the most pertinent parameter. Then, the sensitivity of ML models to hyperparameter, split ratio, and data distribution is evaluated. Finally, a mutual assessment is conducted to rank their accuracy and generalization when predicting the heat transfer coefficient across three real-world operating scenarios. This study concludes that: 1) BPNN and XGBoost emerge as the best performers with the highest accuracy, achieving a MAPE of 2.938 % and 3.074 %, respectively, among eleven approaches with four ML models and seven <em>Nu</em> correlation-based models included; 2) BPNN and XGBoost exhibit strong generalization ability, demonstrating accuracy losses of less than 0.057 and 0.244, respectively, against unseen data; 3) unlike FCDN, which requires substantial computational time, or SVM, which produces significant errors, BPNN and XGBoost are more reliable and efficient in forecasting sCO<sub>2</sub>-PCHEs’ performance for future power cycle control studies that involve vast operating conditions and numerous rounds of optimization search.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 106471"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A guideline study for optimal machine learning approaches to predict the off-design performance of sCO2-PCHEs\",\"authors\":\"Xin Sui , Wenqi Wang , Chunyang Liu , Peixin Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As research increasingly focuses on predicting the off-design performance of PCHEs using machine learning (ML) approaches, there is a clear need to identify the most cost-effective method that offers optimal accuracy and generalization across a wide range of operating conditions in sCO<sub>2</sub> power cycles. In response, this study establishes highly accurate machine learning proxies, including XGBoost, SVMs, BPNNs, and FCDNs for comparison, aiming to rank and identify the one with the best accuracy and generalization for different operating conditions of PCHEs. First, multiple datasets concerning the geometric parameters and working conditions of PCHEs are consolidated. Two data-driven techniques are introduced to correlate both inputs and outputs, identifying the most pertinent parameter. Then, the sensitivity of ML models to hyperparameter, split ratio, and data distribution is evaluated. Finally, a mutual assessment is conducted to rank their accuracy and generalization when predicting the heat transfer coefficient across three real-world operating scenarios. This study concludes that: 1) BPNN and XGBoost emerge as the best performers with the highest accuracy, achieving a MAPE of 2.938 % and 3.074 %, respectively, among eleven approaches with four ML models and seven <em>Nu</em> correlation-based models included; 2) BPNN and XGBoost exhibit strong generalization ability, demonstrating accuracy losses of less than 0.057 and 0.244, respectively, against unseen data; 3) unlike FCDN, which requires substantial computational time, or SVM, which produces significant errors, BPNN and XGBoost are more reliable and efficient in forecasting sCO<sub>2</sub>-PCHEs’ performance for future power cycle control studies that involve vast operating conditions and numerous rounds of optimization search.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25007312\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25007312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A guideline study for optimal machine learning approaches to predict the off-design performance of sCO2-PCHEs
As research increasingly focuses on predicting the off-design performance of PCHEs using machine learning (ML) approaches, there is a clear need to identify the most cost-effective method that offers optimal accuracy and generalization across a wide range of operating conditions in sCO2 power cycles. In response, this study establishes highly accurate machine learning proxies, including XGBoost, SVMs, BPNNs, and FCDNs for comparison, aiming to rank and identify the one with the best accuracy and generalization for different operating conditions of PCHEs. First, multiple datasets concerning the geometric parameters and working conditions of PCHEs are consolidated. Two data-driven techniques are introduced to correlate both inputs and outputs, identifying the most pertinent parameter. Then, the sensitivity of ML models to hyperparameter, split ratio, and data distribution is evaluated. Finally, a mutual assessment is conducted to rank their accuracy and generalization when predicting the heat transfer coefficient across three real-world operating scenarios. This study concludes that: 1) BPNN and XGBoost emerge as the best performers with the highest accuracy, achieving a MAPE of 2.938 % and 3.074 %, respectively, among eleven approaches with four ML models and seven Nu correlation-based models included; 2) BPNN and XGBoost exhibit strong generalization ability, demonstrating accuracy losses of less than 0.057 and 0.244, respectively, against unseen data; 3) unlike FCDN, which requires substantial computational time, or SVM, which produces significant errors, BPNN and XGBoost are more reliable and efficient in forecasting sCO2-PCHEs’ performance for future power cycle control studies that involve vast operating conditions and numerous rounds of optimization search.
期刊介绍:
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.