预测sCO2-PCHEs非设计性能的最佳机器学习方法的指导性研究

IF 6.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 THERMODYNAMICS
Xin Sui , Wenqi Wang , Chunyang Liu , Peixin Dong
{"title":"预测sCO2-PCHEs非设计性能的最佳机器学习方法的指导性研究","authors":"Xin Sui ,&nbsp;Wenqi Wang ,&nbsp;Chunyang Liu ,&nbsp;Peixin Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As research increasingly focuses on predicting the off-design performance of PCHEs using machine learning (ML) approaches, there is a clear need to identify the most cost-effective method that offers optimal accuracy and generalization across a wide range of operating conditions in sCO<sub>2</sub> power cycles. In response, this study establishes highly accurate machine learning proxies, including XGBoost, SVMs, BPNNs, and FCDNs for comparison, aiming to rank and identify the one with the best accuracy and generalization for different operating conditions of PCHEs. First, multiple datasets concerning the geometric parameters and working conditions of PCHEs are consolidated. Two data-driven techniques are introduced to correlate both inputs and outputs, identifying the most pertinent parameter. Then, the sensitivity of ML models to hyperparameter, split ratio, and data distribution is evaluated. Finally, a mutual assessment is conducted to rank their accuracy and generalization when predicting the heat transfer coefficient across three real-world operating scenarios. This study concludes that: 1) BPNN and XGBoost emerge as the best performers with the highest accuracy, achieving a MAPE of 2.938 % and 3.074 %, respectively, among eleven approaches with four ML models and seven <em>Nu</em> correlation-based models included; 2) BPNN and XGBoost exhibit strong generalization ability, demonstrating accuracy losses of less than 0.057 and 0.244, respectively, against unseen data; 3) unlike FCDN, which requires substantial computational time, or SVM, which produces significant errors, BPNN and XGBoost are more reliable and efficient in forecasting sCO<sub>2</sub>-PCHEs’ performance for future power cycle control studies that involve vast operating conditions and numerous rounds of optimization search.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 106471"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A guideline study for optimal machine learning approaches to predict the off-design performance of sCO2-PCHEs\",\"authors\":\"Xin Sui ,&nbsp;Wenqi Wang ,&nbsp;Chunyang Liu ,&nbsp;Peixin Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As research increasingly focuses on predicting the off-design performance of PCHEs using machine learning (ML) approaches, there is a clear need to identify the most cost-effective method that offers optimal accuracy and generalization across a wide range of operating conditions in sCO<sub>2</sub> power cycles. In response, this study establishes highly accurate machine learning proxies, including XGBoost, SVMs, BPNNs, and FCDNs for comparison, aiming to rank and identify the one with the best accuracy and generalization for different operating conditions of PCHEs. First, multiple datasets concerning the geometric parameters and working conditions of PCHEs are consolidated. Two data-driven techniques are introduced to correlate both inputs and outputs, identifying the most pertinent parameter. Then, the sensitivity of ML models to hyperparameter, split ratio, and data distribution is evaluated. Finally, a mutual assessment is conducted to rank their accuracy and generalization when predicting the heat transfer coefficient across three real-world operating scenarios. This study concludes that: 1) BPNN and XGBoost emerge as the best performers with the highest accuracy, achieving a MAPE of 2.938 % and 3.074 %, respectively, among eleven approaches with four ML models and seven <em>Nu</em> correlation-based models included; 2) BPNN and XGBoost exhibit strong generalization ability, demonstrating accuracy losses of less than 0.057 and 0.244, respectively, against unseen data; 3) unlike FCDN, which requires substantial computational time, or SVM, which produces significant errors, BPNN and XGBoost are more reliable and efficient in forecasting sCO<sub>2</sub>-PCHEs’ performance for future power cycle control studies that involve vast operating conditions and numerous rounds of optimization search.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25007312\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25007312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着越来越多的研究关注于使用机器学习(ML)方法预测pch的非设计性能,显然需要确定最具成本效益的方法,在sCO2功率循环的广泛操作条件下提供最佳的准确性和通用性。为此,本研究建立了高精度的机器学习代理,包括XGBoost、svm、bpnn和fcdn进行比较,旨在对pch不同运行条件下精度和泛化最好的机器学习代理进行排名和识别。首先,对pchs的几何参数和工作条件的多个数据集进行整合。介绍了两种数据驱动技术来关联输入和输出,确定最相关的参数。然后,评估了ML模型对超参数、分割率和数据分布的敏感性。最后,在预测三种实际操作场景的传热系数时,进行了相互评估,以对其准确性和泛化进行排名。研究结果表明:1)在包含4个ML模型和7个Nu相关模型的11种方法中,BPNN和XGBoost表现最好,准确率最高,MAPE分别达到2.938%和3.074%;2) BPNN和XGBoost具有较强的泛化能力,对未知数据的准确率损失分别小于0.057和0.244;3)与需要大量计算时间的FCDN或产生显著误差的SVM不同,BPNN和XGBoost在预测sCO2-PCHEs的性能方面更为可靠和高效,适用于涉及大量运行条件和多轮优化搜索的未来功率循环控制研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A guideline study for optimal machine learning approaches to predict the off-design performance of sCO2-PCHEs
As research increasingly focuses on predicting the off-design performance of PCHEs using machine learning (ML) approaches, there is a clear need to identify the most cost-effective method that offers optimal accuracy and generalization across a wide range of operating conditions in sCO2 power cycles. In response, this study establishes highly accurate machine learning proxies, including XGBoost, SVMs, BPNNs, and FCDNs for comparison, aiming to rank and identify the one with the best accuracy and generalization for different operating conditions of PCHEs. First, multiple datasets concerning the geometric parameters and working conditions of PCHEs are consolidated. Two data-driven techniques are introduced to correlate both inputs and outputs, identifying the most pertinent parameter. Then, the sensitivity of ML models to hyperparameter, split ratio, and data distribution is evaluated. Finally, a mutual assessment is conducted to rank their accuracy and generalization when predicting the heat transfer coefficient across three real-world operating scenarios. This study concludes that: 1) BPNN and XGBoost emerge as the best performers with the highest accuracy, achieving a MAPE of 2.938 % and 3.074 %, respectively, among eleven approaches with four ML models and seven Nu correlation-based models included; 2) BPNN and XGBoost exhibit strong generalization ability, demonstrating accuracy losses of less than 0.057 and 0.244, respectively, against unseen data; 3) unlike FCDN, which requires substantial computational time, or SVM, which produces significant errors, BPNN and XGBoost are more reliable and efficient in forecasting sCO2-PCHEs’ performance for future power cycle control studies that involve vast operating conditions and numerous rounds of optimization search.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
812
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信