Pedro Trejo , Claudia Azevedo-Ramos , Felipe Lenti
{"title":"巴西亚马逊森林破碎化:趋势和保护策略","authors":"Pedro Trejo , Claudia Azevedo-Ramos , Felipe Lenti","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2025.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tropical forests have experienced increasing fragmentation. The trajectory of forest fragmentation (sequence, permanence, and location) offers valuable insights for shaping environmental strategies. We examined fragmentation trends and metrics in the Brazilian Amazon over a 34-year period, encompassing its macroregions: Western (WA), Central (CA), and Eastern Amazon (EA). The findings reveal an ongoing fragmentation, characterized by an increase in fragment numbers (WA: +37%, from 49,871 to 68,067 fragments; CA: +82%, 72,463–132,051 fragments; EA: +178%, 164,249–456,399 fragments) and a reduction in mean fragment size (WA: −28%, from 2825.7–2036.8 ha; CA: −48%, 1747.4–905.4 ha; EA: −75%, 651.8–162.3 ha), particularly in the east. Transitions occurred across few forest classes, typically, from forest Core to connecting forest, and eventually to anthropogenic areas. The Core class's permanence was longest in WA (32 years), while anthropogenic areas had the highest permanence in EA (7.6 years) and the lowest in WA (<1 year). Intermediate fragmentation classes were more prevalent in EA, which also demonstrated higher entropy. CA requires immediate attention actions from decision-makers to prevent the intense fragmentation shown in EA. We suggested strategies to mitigate Amazon fragmentation, emphasizing integrated metrics and region-specific approaches for enhanced connectivity and reduced forest loss.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon: Trends and conservation strategies\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Trejo , Claudia Azevedo-Ramos , Felipe Lenti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecon.2025.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Tropical forests have experienced increasing fragmentation. The trajectory of forest fragmentation (sequence, permanence, and location) offers valuable insights for shaping environmental strategies. We examined fragmentation trends and metrics in the Brazilian Amazon over a 34-year period, encompassing its macroregions: Western (WA), Central (CA), and Eastern Amazon (EA). The findings reveal an ongoing fragmentation, characterized by an increase in fragment numbers (WA: +37%, from 49,871 to 68,067 fragments; CA: +82%, 72,463–132,051 fragments; EA: +178%, 164,249–456,399 fragments) and a reduction in mean fragment size (WA: −28%, from 2825.7–2036.8 ha; CA: −48%, 1747.4–905.4 ha; EA: −75%, 651.8–162.3 ha), particularly in the east. Transitions occurred across few forest classes, typically, from forest Core to connecting forest, and eventually to anthropogenic areas. The Core class's permanence was longest in WA (32 years), while anthropogenic areas had the highest permanence in EA (7.6 years) and the lowest in WA (<1 year). Intermediate fragmentation classes were more prevalent in EA, which also demonstrated higher entropy. CA requires immediate attention actions from decision-makers to prevent the intense fragmentation shown in EA. We suggested strategies to mitigate Amazon fragmentation, emphasizing integrated metrics and region-specific approaches for enhanced connectivity and reduced forest loss.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 104-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064425000161\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064425000161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Forest fragmentation in the Brazilian Amazon: Trends and conservation strategies
Tropical forests have experienced increasing fragmentation. The trajectory of forest fragmentation (sequence, permanence, and location) offers valuable insights for shaping environmental strategies. We examined fragmentation trends and metrics in the Brazilian Amazon over a 34-year period, encompassing its macroregions: Western (WA), Central (CA), and Eastern Amazon (EA). The findings reveal an ongoing fragmentation, characterized by an increase in fragment numbers (WA: +37%, from 49,871 to 68,067 fragments; CA: +82%, 72,463–132,051 fragments; EA: +178%, 164,249–456,399 fragments) and a reduction in mean fragment size (WA: −28%, from 2825.7–2036.8 ha; CA: −48%, 1747.4–905.4 ha; EA: −75%, 651.8–162.3 ha), particularly in the east. Transitions occurred across few forest classes, typically, from forest Core to connecting forest, and eventually to anthropogenic areas. The Core class's permanence was longest in WA (32 years), while anthropogenic areas had the highest permanence in EA (7.6 years) and the lowest in WA (<1 year). Intermediate fragmentation classes were more prevalent in EA, which also demonstrated higher entropy. CA requires immediate attention actions from decision-makers to prevent the intense fragmentation shown in EA. We suggested strategies to mitigate Amazon fragmentation, emphasizing integrated metrics and region-specific approaches for enhanced connectivity and reduced forest loss.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.