政府透明度与税收合规性:来自人工实验的证据,辅以行政数据

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Trent McNamara , Roberto Mosquera
{"title":"政府透明度与税收合规性:来自人工实验的证据,辅以行政数据","authors":"Trent McNamara ,&nbsp;Roberto Mosquera","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective tax policy requires understanding behavioral decision-making. We investigate reciprocity and whether misperceptions about how the government allocates funds impacts taxpaying behaviors. In an artefactual survey experiment supplemented with administrative tax payment data from 2,000 self-employed workers, preferences and beliefs on government spending are elicited. In the case when revealing the actual distribution improves beliefs relative to preferences, government support increases (0.30 s.d.), views on taxes improve (0.24 s.d.), and affective polarization decreases (0.40 s.d.). However, there is no effect on reported income tax. When beliefs are worsened relative to preferences, there is no significant response on stated outcomes, but we find an increase in reported income tax.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107042"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government transparency and tax compliance: Evidence from an artefactual experiment supplemented with administrative data\",\"authors\":\"Trent McNamara ,&nbsp;Roberto Mosquera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Effective tax policy requires understanding behavioral decision-making. We investigate reciprocity and whether misperceptions about how the government allocates funds impacts taxpaying behaviors. In an artefactual survey experiment supplemented with administrative tax payment data from 2,000 self-employed workers, preferences and beliefs on government spending are elicited. In the case when revealing the actual distribution improves beliefs relative to preferences, government support increases (0.30 s.d.), views on taxes improve (0.24 s.d.), and affective polarization decreases (0.40 s.d.). However, there is no effect on reported income tax. When beliefs are worsened relative to preferences, there is no significant response on stated outcomes, but we find an increase in reported income tax.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125001611\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125001611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有效的税收政策需要理解行为决策。我们调查了互惠性,以及对政府如何分配资金的误解是否会影响纳税行为。在一项人工调查实验中,辅以2000名个体经营者的行政税收数据,得出了对政府支出的偏好和看法。在揭示实际分布改善相对于偏好的信念的情况下,政府支持增加(0.30 s.d),对税收的看法改善(0.24 s.d),情感两极分化减少(0.40 s.d)。然而,这对申报的所得税没有影响。当信念相对于偏好恶化时,对陈述的结果没有显著的反应,但我们发现报告的所得税增加了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Government transparency and tax compliance: Evidence from an artefactual experiment supplemented with administrative data
Effective tax policy requires understanding behavioral decision-making. We investigate reciprocity and whether misperceptions about how the government allocates funds impacts taxpaying behaviors. In an artefactual survey experiment supplemented with administrative tax payment data from 2,000 self-employed workers, preferences and beliefs on government spending are elicited. In the case when revealing the actual distribution improves beliefs relative to preferences, government support increases (0.30 s.d.), views on taxes improve (0.24 s.d.), and affective polarization decreases (0.40 s.d.). However, there is no effect on reported income tax. When beliefs are worsened relative to preferences, there is no significant response on stated outcomes, but we find an increase in reported income tax.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信