{"title":"弹性需求和数量依赖运输成本下零售商竞争的一般框架","authors":"Rosa-Branca Esteves, Francisco Carballo-Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper extends the classic Hotelling model by addressing two critical limitations: the assumption of perfectly inelastic demand and the exclusion of quantity-dependent transport costs. Traditional models fail to capture key market dynamics where consumer purchasing behavior depends on both price sensitivity and transport costs that vary with the quantity purchased. While prior studies have incorporated elastic demand into spatial competition, they often rely on specific demand functions and assume quantity-independent transport costs, limiting their applicability to diverse market scenarios. To address these gaps, we propose a general elastic demand framework and a novel transport cost function that depends on both distance and purchase quantity, introducing the elasticity of transport costs with respect to quantity as a key parameter. This dual extension highlights how store differentiation, demand elasticity, and transport cost elasticity jointly influence equilibrium prices and profits. Our findings demonstrate that, consistent with the classic Hotelling model, prices and profits increase with store differentiation. Higher demand elasticity intensifies competition, lowering prices and profits, whereas higher transport cost elasticity reduces competition by discouraging consumers from traveling for larger purchases, particularly for bulky goods. Conversely, for lightweight goods with low transport cost sensitivity, competition is more intense, leading to lower prices and profits. By integrating demand and transport cost elasticities, our model bridges significant gaps in spatial competition literature and provides actionable insights for pricing strategies across diverse product categories. These findings advance theoretical understanding and offer practical guidance for retail pricing and market policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 104358"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A general framework for retailer competition under elastic demand and quantity-dependent transport costs\",\"authors\":\"Rosa-Branca Esteves, Francisco Carballo-Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper extends the classic Hotelling model by addressing two critical limitations: the assumption of perfectly inelastic demand and the exclusion of quantity-dependent transport costs. Traditional models fail to capture key market dynamics where consumer purchasing behavior depends on both price sensitivity and transport costs that vary with the quantity purchased. While prior studies have incorporated elastic demand into spatial competition, they often rely on specific demand functions and assume quantity-independent transport costs, limiting their applicability to diverse market scenarios. To address these gaps, we propose a general elastic demand framework and a novel transport cost function that depends on both distance and purchase quantity, introducing the elasticity of transport costs with respect to quantity as a key parameter. This dual extension highlights how store differentiation, demand elasticity, and transport cost elasticity jointly influence equilibrium prices and profits. Our findings demonstrate that, consistent with the classic Hotelling model, prices and profits increase with store differentiation. Higher demand elasticity intensifies competition, lowering prices and profits, whereas higher transport cost elasticity reduces competition by discouraging consumers from traveling for larger purchases, particularly for bulky goods. Conversely, for lightweight goods with low transport cost sensitivity, competition is more intense, leading to lower prices and profits. By integrating demand and transport cost elasticities, our model bridges significant gaps in spatial competition literature and provides actionable insights for pricing strategies across diverse product categories. These findings advance theoretical understanding and offer practical guidance for retail pricing and market policy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925001377\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698925001377","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A general framework for retailer competition under elastic demand and quantity-dependent transport costs
This paper extends the classic Hotelling model by addressing two critical limitations: the assumption of perfectly inelastic demand and the exclusion of quantity-dependent transport costs. Traditional models fail to capture key market dynamics where consumer purchasing behavior depends on both price sensitivity and transport costs that vary with the quantity purchased. While prior studies have incorporated elastic demand into spatial competition, they often rely on specific demand functions and assume quantity-independent transport costs, limiting their applicability to diverse market scenarios. To address these gaps, we propose a general elastic demand framework and a novel transport cost function that depends on both distance and purchase quantity, introducing the elasticity of transport costs with respect to quantity as a key parameter. This dual extension highlights how store differentiation, demand elasticity, and transport cost elasticity jointly influence equilibrium prices and profits. Our findings demonstrate that, consistent with the classic Hotelling model, prices and profits increase with store differentiation. Higher demand elasticity intensifies competition, lowering prices and profits, whereas higher transport cost elasticity reduces competition by discouraging consumers from traveling for larger purchases, particularly for bulky goods. Conversely, for lightweight goods with low transport cost sensitivity, competition is more intense, leading to lower prices and profits. By integrating demand and transport cost elasticities, our model bridges significant gaps in spatial competition literature and provides actionable insights for pricing strategies across diverse product categories. These findings advance theoretical understanding and offer practical guidance for retail pricing and market policy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are:
Retailing and the sale of goods
The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.