{"title":"美国的社会生态梯度和城市-区域地理空间结构","authors":"Steven M. Richter, Roshan Saud","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urbanization diversly manifests across social and ecological dimensions. Gradient analysis, a technique capable of systematically assessing relationships across space, provides insight into urban geospatial structure. Through a combination of geo-computation and automation, we construct urban gradients for 370 US city-regions across 13 metrics that span social, physical, landscape, and emissions domains. To acknowledge urban shape irregularity, modeling leverages an absolute- and relative-distance measure that normalizes distance using the urban periphery. These two approaches, augmented by an urban-only model, yield more than 14 k linear regression models that demonstrate how most urban social-ecological phenomena follow an outward gradient. Model fits are loose, likely due to urban heterogeneity and methodological challenges, but only one metric (Social Vulnerability) had a gradient that was not linear. Importantly, model significance and fit both benefit from implementation of the relative-distance predictor. To synthesize model outputs (slope and y-intercept), 165 urban regions are processed using k-means and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results identify four to six distinct geospatial structures across the US. Hierarchical clustering is driven by variables corresponding to urban core intensity (population density, imperviousness) and functioning (housing type, GHG emissions), while the more flexible k-means clustering produced geographically representative divisions based on tree canopy, steep slopes, air quality, and household income. This work represents both a novel analysis of geo-spatial structure and synthesis useful to academics and policymakers alike. The identified clusters support a context-sensitive approach to sustainability or resilience and aid in identification of peer-cities useful for transfer of policy and planning solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 105441"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social-ecological gradients and city-regional geospatial structure across the United States\",\"authors\":\"Steven M. Richter, Roshan Saud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urbanization diversly manifests across social and ecological dimensions. Gradient analysis, a technique capable of systematically assessing relationships across space, provides insight into urban geospatial structure. Through a combination of geo-computation and automation, we construct urban gradients for 370 US city-regions across 13 metrics that span social, physical, landscape, and emissions domains. To acknowledge urban shape irregularity, modeling leverages an absolute- and relative-distance measure that normalizes distance using the urban periphery. These two approaches, augmented by an urban-only model, yield more than 14 k linear regression models that demonstrate how most urban social-ecological phenomena follow an outward gradient. Model fits are loose, likely due to urban heterogeneity and methodological challenges, but only one metric (Social Vulnerability) had a gradient that was not linear. Importantly, model significance and fit both benefit from implementation of the relative-distance predictor. To synthesize model outputs (slope and y-intercept), 165 urban regions are processed using k-means and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results identify four to six distinct geospatial structures across the US. Hierarchical clustering is driven by variables corresponding to urban core intensity (population density, imperviousness) and functioning (housing type, GHG emissions), while the more flexible k-means clustering produced geographically representative divisions based on tree canopy, steep slopes, air quality, and household income. This work represents both a novel analysis of geo-spatial structure and synthesis useful to academics and policymakers alike. The identified clusters support a context-sensitive approach to sustainability or resilience and aid in identification of peer-cities useful for transfer of policy and planning solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001483\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204625001483","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Social-ecological gradients and city-regional geospatial structure across the United States
Urbanization diversly manifests across social and ecological dimensions. Gradient analysis, a technique capable of systematically assessing relationships across space, provides insight into urban geospatial structure. Through a combination of geo-computation and automation, we construct urban gradients for 370 US city-regions across 13 metrics that span social, physical, landscape, and emissions domains. To acknowledge urban shape irregularity, modeling leverages an absolute- and relative-distance measure that normalizes distance using the urban periphery. These two approaches, augmented by an urban-only model, yield more than 14 k linear regression models that demonstrate how most urban social-ecological phenomena follow an outward gradient. Model fits are loose, likely due to urban heterogeneity and methodological challenges, but only one metric (Social Vulnerability) had a gradient that was not linear. Importantly, model significance and fit both benefit from implementation of the relative-distance predictor. To synthesize model outputs (slope and y-intercept), 165 urban regions are processed using k-means and hierarchical cluster analysis. Results identify four to six distinct geospatial structures across the US. Hierarchical clustering is driven by variables corresponding to urban core intensity (population density, imperviousness) and functioning (housing type, GHG emissions), while the more flexible k-means clustering produced geographically representative divisions based on tree canopy, steep slopes, air quality, and household income. This work represents both a novel analysis of geo-spatial structure and synthesis useful to academics and policymakers alike. The identified clusters support a context-sensitive approach to sustainability or resilience and aid in identification of peer-cities useful for transfer of policy and planning solutions.
期刊介绍:
Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.