{"title":"mazei甲烷菌Go1和热自养甲烷菌ΔH捕集CO2和烟气碳","authors":"Dhayanithi Sethuraman, Chellapandi Paulchamy","doi":"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Methane production from CO<sub>2</sub> and flue gas by <em>Methanosarcina mazei Gö1</em> and <em>Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus</em> ∆H was evaluated under various environmental and nutritional conditions to optimize methane production. <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> exhibited optimal methane production at 60 °C, yielding 18.64 ± 0.75 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>, whereas <em>M. mazei</em> demonstrated peak activity at 35 °C with CO<sub>2</sub> and 40 °C with flue gas, <em>albeit</em> with lower yields under thermophilic conditions. The optimal pH for <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> was 5, producing 18.48 ± 0.75 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> of methane with CO<sub>2</sub>, while <em>M. mazei</em> preferred a neutral pH for maximal methane production. Methane production in <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> was significantly increased at 200 kPa, resulting in a methane content of 13.84 ± 0.55 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> with flue gas. Organic nitrogen sources significantly improved methane yields; peptone and soybean meal enhanced methane production to 18.64 ± 0.75 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> and 13.84 ± 0.55 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, in <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em>. Inorganic nitrogen sources, particularly NaNO<sub>2</sub>, also supported higher methane production, achieving 11.70 ± 0.47 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> with flue gas. Phosphate and sulfate supplementation were critical; <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> exhibited maximum activity with Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> (3.35 ± 0.13 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>) and FeSO<sub>4</sub> (7.98 ± 0.32 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>) under CO<sub>2</sub> conditions. The optimal inoculum densities were determined to be 5–10 % for <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> and 15 % for <em>M. mazei</em>. Therefore, the integration of these methanogens into biogas systems offers a promising approach for efficient CO<sub>2</sub> and flue gas conversion, indicating their potential for sustainable bioenergy production and greenhouse gas mitigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8947,"journal":{"name":"Bioresource Technology Reports","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 102149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing CO2 and flue gas carbon by Methanosarcina mazei Go1 and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH\",\"authors\":\"Dhayanithi Sethuraman, Chellapandi Paulchamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Methane production from CO<sub>2</sub> and flue gas by <em>Methanosarcina mazei Gö1</em> and <em>Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus</em> ∆H was evaluated under various environmental and nutritional conditions to optimize methane production. <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> exhibited optimal methane production at 60 °C, yielding 18.64 ± 0.75 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>, whereas <em>M. mazei</em> demonstrated peak activity at 35 °C with CO<sub>2</sub> and 40 °C with flue gas, <em>albeit</em> with lower yields under thermophilic conditions. The optimal pH for <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> was 5, producing 18.48 ± 0.75 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> of methane with CO<sub>2</sub>, while <em>M. mazei</em> preferred a neutral pH for maximal methane production. Methane production in <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> was significantly increased at 200 kPa, resulting in a methane content of 13.84 ± 0.55 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> with flue gas. Organic nitrogen sources significantly improved methane yields; peptone and soybean meal enhanced methane production to 18.64 ± 0.75 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> and 13.84 ± 0.55 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, in <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em>. Inorganic nitrogen sources, particularly NaNO<sub>2</sub>, also supported higher methane production, achieving 11.70 ± 0.47 μmol L<sup>−1</sup> with flue gas. Phosphate and sulfate supplementation were critical; <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> exhibited maximum activity with Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> (3.35 ± 0.13 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>) and FeSO<sub>4</sub> (7.98 ± 0.32 μmol L<sup>−1</sup>) under CO<sub>2</sub> conditions. The optimal inoculum densities were determined to be 5–10 % for <em>M. thermautotrophicus</em> and 15 % for <em>M. mazei</em>. Therefore, the integration of these methanogens into biogas systems offers a promising approach for efficient CO<sub>2</sub> and flue gas conversion, indicating their potential for sustainable bioenergy production and greenhouse gas mitigation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresource Technology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresource Technology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589014X25001318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Capturing CO2 and flue gas carbon by Methanosarcina mazei Go1 and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ΔH
Methane production from CO2 and flue gas by Methanosarcina mazei Gö1 and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ∆H was evaluated under various environmental and nutritional conditions to optimize methane production. M. thermautotrophicus exhibited optimal methane production at 60 °C, yielding 18.64 ± 0.75 μmol L−1, whereas M. mazei demonstrated peak activity at 35 °C with CO2 and 40 °C with flue gas, albeit with lower yields under thermophilic conditions. The optimal pH for M. thermautotrophicus was 5, producing 18.48 ± 0.75 μmol L−1 of methane with CO2, while M. mazei preferred a neutral pH for maximal methane production. Methane production in M. thermautotrophicus was significantly increased at 200 kPa, resulting in a methane content of 13.84 ± 0.55 μmol L−1 with flue gas. Organic nitrogen sources significantly improved methane yields; peptone and soybean meal enhanced methane production to 18.64 ± 0.75 μmol L−1 and 13.84 ± 0.55 μmol L−1, respectively, in M. thermautotrophicus. Inorganic nitrogen sources, particularly NaNO2, also supported higher methane production, achieving 11.70 ± 0.47 μmol L−1 with flue gas. Phosphate and sulfate supplementation were critical; M. thermautotrophicus exhibited maximum activity with Na2HPO4 (3.35 ± 0.13 μmol L−1) and FeSO4 (7.98 ± 0.32 μmol L−1) under CO2 conditions. The optimal inoculum densities were determined to be 5–10 % for M. thermautotrophicus and 15 % for M. mazei. Therefore, the integration of these methanogens into biogas systems offers a promising approach for efficient CO2 and flue gas conversion, indicating their potential for sustainable bioenergy production and greenhouse gas mitigation.