在一种新颖的“无报告”双目竞争范式中,注视转移诱导了眼跳相关的知觉转换

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ege Kingir , Ryo Segawa , Janis K. Hesse , Igor Kagan , Melanie Wilke
{"title":"在一种新颖的“无报告”双目竞争范式中,注视转移诱导了眼跳相关的知觉转换","authors":"Ege Kingir ,&nbsp;Ryo Segawa ,&nbsp;Janis K. Hesse ,&nbsp;Igor Kagan ,&nbsp;Melanie Wilke","doi":"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>No-report paradigms help to avoid report-related confounds in conscious perception studies. A novel no-report binocular rivalry paradigm by Hesse and Tsao (2020) tracks conscious content using eye position as subjects follow fixation points linked to the rivaling stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether perceptual switches arise spontaneously or are induced by external factors such as visual transients due to fixation point shifts and saccades. We found an increased probability of perceptual switches time-locked to fixation point shifts, indicating that some switches are externally driven. To disentangle the effects of visual changes and saccades, we implemented a two-factorial design and found that saccades play a larger role in eliciting perceptual switches. We estimate that 14% of saccades trigger a switch, accounting for 24% of all perceptual transitions. Our findings provide an analysis framework and guidelines for excluding externally driven perceptual switches, enabling a clearer focus on internally generated perceptual dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51358,"journal":{"name":"Consciousness and Cognition","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 103891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixation shifts in a novel “no-report” binocular rivalry paradigm induce saccade-related perceptual switches\",\"authors\":\"Ege Kingir ,&nbsp;Ryo Segawa ,&nbsp;Janis K. Hesse ,&nbsp;Igor Kagan ,&nbsp;Melanie Wilke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.concog.2025.103891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>No-report paradigms help to avoid report-related confounds in conscious perception studies. A novel no-report binocular rivalry paradigm by Hesse and Tsao (2020) tracks conscious content using eye position as subjects follow fixation points linked to the rivaling stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether perceptual switches arise spontaneously or are induced by external factors such as visual transients due to fixation point shifts and saccades. We found an increased probability of perceptual switches time-locked to fixation point shifts, indicating that some switches are externally driven. To disentangle the effects of visual changes and saccades, we implemented a two-factorial design and found that saccades play a larger role in eliciting perceptual switches. We estimate that 14% of saccades trigger a switch, accounting for 24% of all perceptual transitions. Our findings provide an analysis framework and guidelines for excluding externally driven perceptual switches, enabling a clearer focus on internally generated perceptual dynamics.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"volume\":\"133 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103891\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consciousness and Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810025000844\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consciousness and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810025000844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在意识知觉研究中,无报告范式有助于避免报告相关的混淆。Hesse和Tsao(2020)提出了一种新的无报告双目竞争范式,当受试者跟随与竞争刺激相关的注视点时,他们使用眼睛位置跟踪有意识的内容。然而,目前尚不清楚感知开关是自发产生的还是由外部因素引起的,如注视点移动和扫视引起的视觉瞬变。我们发现感知开关时间锁定到固定点移动的可能性增加,表明一些开关是外部驱动的。为了解开视觉变化和扫视的影响,我们实施了一个双因子设计,发现扫视在引发感知转换中起着更大的作用。我们估计14%的扫视会触发转换,占所有感知转换的24%。我们的研究结果为排除外部驱动的感知开关提供了一个分析框架和指导方针,从而能够更清晰地关注内部产生的感知动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fixation shifts in a novel “no-report” binocular rivalry paradigm induce saccade-related perceptual switches
No-report paradigms help to avoid report-related confounds in conscious perception studies. A novel no-report binocular rivalry paradigm by Hesse and Tsao (2020) tracks conscious content using eye position as subjects follow fixation points linked to the rivaling stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether perceptual switches arise spontaneously or are induced by external factors such as visual transients due to fixation point shifts and saccades. We found an increased probability of perceptual switches time-locked to fixation point shifts, indicating that some switches are externally driven. To disentangle the effects of visual changes and saccades, we implemented a two-factorial design and found that saccades play a larger role in eliciting perceptual switches. We estimate that 14% of saccades trigger a switch, accounting for 24% of all perceptual transitions. Our findings provide an analysis framework and guidelines for excluding externally driven perceptual switches, enabling a clearer focus on internally generated perceptual dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Consciousness and Cognition
Consciousness and Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal provides a forum for a natural-science approach to the issues of consciousness, voluntary control, and self. The journal features empirical research (in the form of regular articles and short reports) and theoretical articles. Integrative theoretical and critical literature reviews, and tutorial reviews are also published. The journal aims to be both scientifically rigorous and open to novel contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信