基于弹性的典型恢复区生态安全格局优化——以宁夏盐池县为例

IF 4.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Shangbo Li , Yong Chen , Sen Li , Wanyue Peng
{"title":"基于弹性的典型恢复区生态安全格局优化——以宁夏盐池县为例","authors":"Shangbo Li ,&nbsp;Yong Chen ,&nbsp;Sen Li ,&nbsp;Wanyue Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To enhance ecological resilience in environmentally fragile restoration zones, this study selects Yanchi County in Ningxia, a representative eco-restoration area in northern China, as a case study. A three-tier analytical framework — comprising ecological function identification, process simulation, and resilience-oriented regulation — is developed. By integrating Multi-scale Patching and Spatial Analysis (MSPA), dynamic resistance surface modeling, and circuit theory, ecological sources and corridors are accurately identified. A dual-dimensional resilience assessment system based on the “source–corridor” structure is constructed to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological network from 2000 to 2020. The results reveal that: (1) Ecological service functions increased by 22.45% from 2000 to 2020, although growth slowed after 2010. Meanwhile, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI) rose by 12.5%, with high-risk zones expanding from 14% to 16.3% and shifting northward by 12.6 km, indicating a mismatch between functional gains and risk control; (2) The number of ecological sources decreased by 17% between 2000 and 2010 but rebounded by 8.8% from 2010 to 2020. However, fragmentation intensified, as evidenced by a 21.7% decrease in the largest patch index (LPI), leading to disrupted ecological stability and reduced resilience of source areas;(3) An ecological security pattern — “one core, two zones, two belts, and multiple corridors” — is proposed to enhance network connectivity and mitigate regional ecological threats, particularly wind erosion and soil degradation. This study provides a scientific and technical framework for optimizing ecological security patterns from a resilience perspective in arid and semi-arid regions, offering empirical support for landscape-scale ecological restoration and sustainable management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience-based optimization of ecological security patterns in a typical restoration region: A case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia\",\"authors\":\"Shangbo Li ,&nbsp;Yong Chen ,&nbsp;Sen Li ,&nbsp;Wanyue Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To enhance ecological resilience in environmentally fragile restoration zones, this study selects Yanchi County in Ningxia, a representative eco-restoration area in northern China, as a case study. A three-tier analytical framework — comprising ecological function identification, process simulation, and resilience-oriented regulation — is developed. By integrating Multi-scale Patching and Spatial Analysis (MSPA), dynamic resistance surface modeling, and circuit theory, ecological sources and corridors are accurately identified. A dual-dimensional resilience assessment system based on the “source–corridor” structure is constructed to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological network from 2000 to 2020. The results reveal that: (1) Ecological service functions increased by 22.45% from 2000 to 2020, although growth slowed after 2010. Meanwhile, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI) rose by 12.5%, with high-risk zones expanding from 14% to 16.3% and shifting northward by 12.6 km, indicating a mismatch between functional gains and risk control; (2) The number of ecological sources decreased by 17% between 2000 and 2010 but rebounded by 8.8% from 2010 to 2020. However, fragmentation intensified, as evidenced by a 21.7% decrease in the largest patch index (LPI), leading to disrupted ecological stability and reduced resilience of source areas;(3) An ecological security pattern — “one core, two zones, two belts, and multiple corridors” — is proposed to enhance network connectivity and mitigate regional ecological threats, particularly wind erosion and soil degradation. This study provides a scientific and technical framework for optimizing ecological security patterns from a resilience perspective in arid and semi-arid regions, offering empirical support for landscape-scale ecological restoration and sustainable management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001764\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为增强环境脆弱恢复带的生态恢复能力,本研究选择了中国北方生态恢复的代表性地区宁夏盐池县作为个案研究对象。开发了一个三层分析框架-包括生态功能识别,过程模拟和面向弹性的调节。通过多尺度修补与空间分析(MSPA)、动态电阻面建模和电路理论相结合,准确识别生态源和廊道。构建了基于“源-廊道”结构的二维弹性评价体系,考察了2000 - 2020年生态网络的时空演化。结果表明:(1)2000 ~ 2020年生态服务功能增长22.45%,但2010年后增速有所放缓;生态风险指数(ERI)上升12.5%,高风险区范围从14%扩大到16.3%,并向北移动12.6 km,表明功能收益与风险控制不匹配;(2) 2000 ~ 2010年生态资源数量减少17%,2010 ~ 2020年又回升8.8%。(3)提出了“一核、两带、两带、多廊道”的生态安全格局,增强了生态网络的连通性,缓解了区域生态威胁,特别是风蚀和土壤退化。本研究为基于弹性视角的干旱半干旱区生态安全格局优化提供了科学技术框架,为景观尺度的生态恢复和可持续管理提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience-based optimization of ecological security patterns in a typical restoration region: A case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia
To enhance ecological resilience in environmentally fragile restoration zones, this study selects Yanchi County in Ningxia, a representative eco-restoration area in northern China, as a case study. A three-tier analytical framework — comprising ecological function identification, process simulation, and resilience-oriented regulation — is developed. By integrating Multi-scale Patching and Spatial Analysis (MSPA), dynamic resistance surface modeling, and circuit theory, ecological sources and corridors are accurately identified. A dual-dimensional resilience assessment system based on the “source–corridor” structure is constructed to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological network from 2000 to 2020. The results reveal that: (1) Ecological service functions increased by 22.45% from 2000 to 2020, although growth slowed after 2010. Meanwhile, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI) rose by 12.5%, with high-risk zones expanding from 14% to 16.3% and shifting northward by 12.6 km, indicating a mismatch between functional gains and risk control; (2) The number of ecological sources decreased by 17% between 2000 and 2010 but rebounded by 8.8% from 2010 to 2020. However, fragmentation intensified, as evidenced by a 21.7% decrease in the largest patch index (LPI), leading to disrupted ecological stability and reduced resilience of source areas;(3) An ecological security pattern — “one core, two zones, two belts, and multiple corridors” — is proposed to enhance network connectivity and mitigate regional ecological threats, particularly wind erosion and soil degradation. This study provides a scientific and technical framework for optimizing ecological security patterns from a resilience perspective in arid and semi-arid regions, offering empirical support for landscape-scale ecological restoration and sustainable management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信