{"title":"基于弹性的典型恢复区生态安全格局优化——以宁夏盐池县为例","authors":"Shangbo Li , Yong Chen , Sen Li , Wanyue Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To enhance ecological resilience in environmentally fragile restoration zones, this study selects Yanchi County in Ningxia, a representative eco-restoration area in northern China, as a case study. A three-tier analytical framework — comprising ecological function identification, process simulation, and resilience-oriented regulation — is developed. By integrating Multi-scale Patching and Spatial Analysis (MSPA), dynamic resistance surface modeling, and circuit theory, ecological sources and corridors are accurately identified. A dual-dimensional resilience assessment system based on the “source–corridor” structure is constructed to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological network from 2000 to 2020. The results reveal that: (1) Ecological service functions increased by 22.45% from 2000 to 2020, although growth slowed after 2010. Meanwhile, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI) rose by 12.5%, with high-risk zones expanding from 14% to 16.3% and shifting northward by 12.6 km, indicating a mismatch between functional gains and risk control; (2) The number of ecological sources decreased by 17% between 2000 and 2010 but rebounded by 8.8% from 2010 to 2020. However, fragmentation intensified, as evidenced by a 21.7% decrease in the largest patch index (LPI), leading to disrupted ecological stability and reduced resilience of source areas;(3) An ecological security pattern — “one core, two zones, two belts, and multiple corridors” — is proposed to enhance network connectivity and mitigate regional ecological threats, particularly wind erosion and soil degradation. This study provides a scientific and technical framework for optimizing ecological security patterns from a resilience perspective in arid and semi-arid regions, offering empirical support for landscape-scale ecological restoration and sustainable management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107688"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience-based optimization of ecological security patterns in a typical restoration region: A case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia\",\"authors\":\"Shangbo Li , Yong Chen , Sen Li , Wanyue Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To enhance ecological resilience in environmentally fragile restoration zones, this study selects Yanchi County in Ningxia, a representative eco-restoration area in northern China, as a case study. A three-tier analytical framework — comprising ecological function identification, process simulation, and resilience-oriented regulation — is developed. By integrating Multi-scale Patching and Spatial Analysis (MSPA), dynamic resistance surface modeling, and circuit theory, ecological sources and corridors are accurately identified. A dual-dimensional resilience assessment system based on the “source–corridor” structure is constructed to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological network from 2000 to 2020. The results reveal that: (1) Ecological service functions increased by 22.45% from 2000 to 2020, although growth slowed after 2010. Meanwhile, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI) rose by 12.5%, with high-risk zones expanding from 14% to 16.3% and shifting northward by 12.6 km, indicating a mismatch between functional gains and risk control; (2) The number of ecological sources decreased by 17% between 2000 and 2010 but rebounded by 8.8% from 2010 to 2020. However, fragmentation intensified, as evidenced by a 21.7% decrease in the largest patch index (LPI), leading to disrupted ecological stability and reduced resilience of source areas;(3) An ecological security pattern — “one core, two zones, two belts, and multiple corridors” — is proposed to enhance network connectivity and mitigate regional ecological threats, particularly wind erosion and soil degradation. This study provides a scientific and technical framework for optimizing ecological security patterns from a resilience perspective in arid and semi-arid regions, offering empirical support for landscape-scale ecological restoration and sustainable management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001764\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001764","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Resilience-based optimization of ecological security patterns in a typical restoration region: A case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia
To enhance ecological resilience in environmentally fragile restoration zones, this study selects Yanchi County in Ningxia, a representative eco-restoration area in northern China, as a case study. A three-tier analytical framework — comprising ecological function identification, process simulation, and resilience-oriented regulation — is developed. By integrating Multi-scale Patching and Spatial Analysis (MSPA), dynamic resistance surface modeling, and circuit theory, ecological sources and corridors are accurately identified. A dual-dimensional resilience assessment system based on the “source–corridor” structure is constructed to examine the spatiotemporal evolution of the ecological network from 2000 to 2020. The results reveal that: (1) Ecological service functions increased by 22.45% from 2000 to 2020, although growth slowed after 2010. Meanwhile, the Ecological Risk Index (ERI) rose by 12.5%, with high-risk zones expanding from 14% to 16.3% and shifting northward by 12.6 km, indicating a mismatch between functional gains and risk control; (2) The number of ecological sources decreased by 17% between 2000 and 2010 but rebounded by 8.8% from 2010 to 2020. However, fragmentation intensified, as evidenced by a 21.7% decrease in the largest patch index (LPI), leading to disrupted ecological stability and reduced resilience of source areas;(3) An ecological security pattern — “one core, two zones, two belts, and multiple corridors” — is proposed to enhance network connectivity and mitigate regional ecological threats, particularly wind erosion and soil degradation. This study provides a scientific and technical framework for optimizing ecological security patterns from a resilience perspective in arid and semi-arid regions, offering empirical support for landscape-scale ecological restoration and sustainable management.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.