金黄色葡萄球菌疫苗临床前和临床研究的系统图谱综述

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Rachel Lapeyre , Nouran Rezk , Siobhán McClean , Anne C. Moore
{"title":"金黄色葡萄球菌疫苗临床前和临床研究的系统图谱综述","authors":"Rachel Lapeyre ,&nbsp;Nouran Rezk ,&nbsp;Siobhán McClean ,&nbsp;Anne C. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> is a pathogen that annually causes more than one million deaths globally. However, despite substantial research, no vaccine for human use has yet been licensed. We conducted a systematic mapping review to evaluate the different pre-clinical and clinical approaches taken in <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (<em>S. aureus)</em> vaccine development as well as veterinary vaccines. We examined the testing frequency of different antigens, platforms, routes of immunisation, types of immune response and pre-clinical challenge models. We identified and analysed 358 relevant publications in PubMed. More than 150 antigens were studied in preclinical trials, with alpha-hemolysin (Hla) being the most frequently tested antigen. With respect to pre-clinical challenge models, systemic infections have been studied for the longest period and are the most widely used. Subunit vaccines were the most studied platform; this includes toxoids and polysaccharide antigens. Complete Freund's Adjuvant was the most common adjuvant used and, surprisingly, is still frequently used in recent studies. Antibody titre was the most frequently assessed vaccine-induced immune parameter and opsonophagocytosis has been the most common functional humoral readout. This review identifies trends for the development of a <em>S. aureus</em> vaccine, and highlights the lessons learned from past failures and the opportunities for current and future development. This quantitative evidence identifies predominant themes in the <em>S. aureus</em> vaccine field and therefore contributes to highlighting less explored gaps and potential new avenues of research in ongoing efforts to developing urgently needed, effective <em>S. aureus</em> vaccines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 127333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic mapping review of preclinical and clinical studies of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Lapeyre ,&nbsp;Nouran Rezk ,&nbsp;Siobhán McClean ,&nbsp;Anne C. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> is a pathogen that annually causes more than one million deaths globally. However, despite substantial research, no vaccine for human use has yet been licensed. We conducted a systematic mapping review to evaluate the different pre-clinical and clinical approaches taken in <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> (<em>S. aureus)</em> vaccine development as well as veterinary vaccines. We examined the testing frequency of different antigens, platforms, routes of immunisation, types of immune response and pre-clinical challenge models. We identified and analysed 358 relevant publications in PubMed. More than 150 antigens were studied in preclinical trials, with alpha-hemolysin (Hla) being the most frequently tested antigen. With respect to pre-clinical challenge models, systemic infections have been studied for the longest period and are the most widely used. Subunit vaccines were the most studied platform; this includes toxoids and polysaccharide antigens. Complete Freund's Adjuvant was the most common adjuvant used and, surprisingly, is still frequently used in recent studies. Antibody titre was the most frequently assessed vaccine-induced immune parameter and opsonophagocytosis has been the most common functional humoral readout. This review identifies trends for the development of a <em>S. aureus</em> vaccine, and highlights the lessons learned from past failures and the opportunities for current and future development. This quantitative evidence identifies predominant themes in the <em>S. aureus</em> vaccine field and therefore contributes to highlighting less explored gaps and potential new avenues of research in ongoing efforts to developing urgently needed, effective <em>S. aureus</em> vaccines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25006309\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25006309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金黄色葡萄球菌是一种病原体,每年在全球造成100多万人死亡。然而,尽管进行了大量的研究,但尚未有人类使用的疫苗获得许可。我们进行了一项系统的图谱回顾,以评估金黄色葡萄球菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)疫苗开发以及兽医疫苗所采取的不同临床前和临床方法。我们检查了不同抗原、平台、免疫途径、免疫反应类型和临床前攻击模型的检测频率。我们确定并分析了PubMed上的358篇相关出版物。在临床前试验中研究了150多种抗原,其中α -溶血素(Hla)是最常检测的抗原。关于临床前感染模型,全身性感染研究时间最长,应用最广泛。亚单位疫苗是研究最多的平台;这包括类毒素和多糖抗原。完全弗氏佐剂是最常用的佐剂,令人惊讶的是,在最近的研究中仍然经常使用。抗体滴度是最常评估的疫苗诱导免疫参数,调理吞噬是最常见的功能性体液读数。本综述确定了开发金黄色葡萄球菌疫苗的趋势,并强调了从过去的失败中吸取的教训以及当前和未来开发的机会。这一定量证据确定了金黄色葡萄球菌疫苗领域的主要主题,因此有助于突出在开发迫切需要的有效金黄色葡萄球菌疫苗的持续努力中较少探索的差距和潜在的新研究途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic mapping review of preclinical and clinical studies of Staphylococcus aureus vaccines
Staphylococcus aureus is a pathogen that annually causes more than one million deaths globally. However, despite substantial research, no vaccine for human use has yet been licensed. We conducted a systematic mapping review to evaluate the different pre-clinical and clinical approaches taken in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) vaccine development as well as veterinary vaccines. We examined the testing frequency of different antigens, platforms, routes of immunisation, types of immune response and pre-clinical challenge models. We identified and analysed 358 relevant publications in PubMed. More than 150 antigens were studied in preclinical trials, with alpha-hemolysin (Hla) being the most frequently tested antigen. With respect to pre-clinical challenge models, systemic infections have been studied for the longest period and are the most widely used. Subunit vaccines were the most studied platform; this includes toxoids and polysaccharide antigens. Complete Freund's Adjuvant was the most common adjuvant used and, surprisingly, is still frequently used in recent studies. Antibody titre was the most frequently assessed vaccine-induced immune parameter and opsonophagocytosis has been the most common functional humoral readout. This review identifies trends for the development of a S. aureus vaccine, and highlights the lessons learned from past failures and the opportunities for current and future development. This quantitative evidence identifies predominant themes in the S. aureus vaccine field and therefore contributes to highlighting less explored gaps and potential new avenues of research in ongoing efforts to developing urgently needed, effective S. aureus vaccines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信