Lindsey N. Druschel , Sydney S. Song , Niveda M. Kasthuri , Jaime J. Wang , Jacob H. Conard , E. Ricky Chan , Allison Hess-Dunning , Jeffrey R. Capadona
{"title":"皮质内微电极阵列的神经炎症反应的多组学空间分辨分析","authors":"Lindsey N. Druschel , Sydney S. Song , Niveda M. Kasthuri , Jaime J. Wang , Jacob H. Conard , E. Ricky Chan , Allison Hess-Dunning , Jeffrey R. Capadona","doi":"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are devices implanted into the brain's cortex with the ability to record or stimulate neuronal activity. Unfortunately, MEAs tend to fail over chronic time points, limiting their clinical utility. Chronic failure has largely been attributed to the brain's neuroinflammatory response. Until recently, most of what was understood about the neuroinflammatory response to MEAs was learned through immunohistochemical analysis of small numbers of proteins. More recently, gene expression studies have sequenced thousands of mRNA molecules that contribute to neuroinflammation, but few studies have performed large-scale proteomic analyses. To expand the knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved, we have previously investigated the activity of 62 proteins within 180 μm of the MEA implant site using a spatial proteomic platform. In the present study, we are the first to apply large-scale genomics and proteomics to MEAs, as we evaluate changes in both the whole protein-encoding mouse transcriptome and our 62-protein proteomic panel. We further examine the spatial distribution of the neuroinflammatory response within three distinct domains adjacent to the MEA: 0–90 μm, 90–180 μm, and 180–270 μm from the implant site. Our analysis directly compares the gene and protein expression and highlights the need for segmentation based on proximal distance from the implant site. We also identify key pathways associated with immune cell activation, neurodegeneration, and metabolism that likely contribute to MEA failure and could be targeted to improve MEA performance in future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":254,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterials","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 123477"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-omic spatially resolved analysis of the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode arrays\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey N. Druschel , Sydney S. Song , Niveda M. Kasthuri , Jaime J. Wang , Jacob H. Conard , E. Ricky Chan , Allison Hess-Dunning , Jeffrey R. Capadona\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are devices implanted into the brain's cortex with the ability to record or stimulate neuronal activity. Unfortunately, MEAs tend to fail over chronic time points, limiting their clinical utility. Chronic failure has largely been attributed to the brain's neuroinflammatory response. Until recently, most of what was understood about the neuroinflammatory response to MEAs was learned through immunohistochemical analysis of small numbers of proteins. More recently, gene expression studies have sequenced thousands of mRNA molecules that contribute to neuroinflammation, but few studies have performed large-scale proteomic analyses. To expand the knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved, we have previously investigated the activity of 62 proteins within 180 μm of the MEA implant site using a spatial proteomic platform. In the present study, we are the first to apply large-scale genomics and proteomics to MEAs, as we evaluate changes in both the whole protein-encoding mouse transcriptome and our 62-protein proteomic panel. We further examine the spatial distribution of the neuroinflammatory response within three distinct domains adjacent to the MEA: 0–90 μm, 90–180 μm, and 180–270 μm from the implant site. Our analysis directly compares the gene and protein expression and highlights the need for segmentation based on proximal distance from the implant site. We also identify key pathways associated with immune cell activation, neurodegeneration, and metabolism that likely contribute to MEA failure and could be targeted to improve MEA performance in future studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"324 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961225003965\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961225003965","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-omic spatially resolved analysis of the neuroinflammatory response to intracortical microelectrode arrays
Intracortical microelectrode arrays (MEAs) are devices implanted into the brain's cortex with the ability to record or stimulate neuronal activity. Unfortunately, MEAs tend to fail over chronic time points, limiting their clinical utility. Chronic failure has largely been attributed to the brain's neuroinflammatory response. Until recently, most of what was understood about the neuroinflammatory response to MEAs was learned through immunohistochemical analysis of small numbers of proteins. More recently, gene expression studies have sequenced thousands of mRNA molecules that contribute to neuroinflammation, but few studies have performed large-scale proteomic analyses. To expand the knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved, we have previously investigated the activity of 62 proteins within 180 μm of the MEA implant site using a spatial proteomic platform. In the present study, we are the first to apply large-scale genomics and proteomics to MEAs, as we evaluate changes in both the whole protein-encoding mouse transcriptome and our 62-protein proteomic panel. We further examine the spatial distribution of the neuroinflammatory response within three distinct domains adjacent to the MEA: 0–90 μm, 90–180 μm, and 180–270 μm from the implant site. Our analysis directly compares the gene and protein expression and highlights the need for segmentation based on proximal distance from the implant site. We also identify key pathways associated with immune cell activation, neurodegeneration, and metabolism that likely contribute to MEA failure and could be targeted to improve MEA performance in future studies.
期刊介绍:
Biomaterials is an international journal covering the science and clinical application of biomaterials. A biomaterial is now defined as a substance that has been engineered to take a form which, alone or as part of a complex system, is used to direct, by control of interactions with components of living systems, the course of any therapeutic or diagnostic procedure. It is the aim of the journal to provide a peer-reviewed forum for the publication of original papers and authoritative review and opinion papers dealing with the most important issues facing the use of biomaterials in clinical practice. The scope of the journal covers the wide range of physical, biological and chemical sciences that underpin the design of biomaterials and the clinical disciplines in which they are used. These sciences include polymer synthesis and characterization, drug and gene vector design, the biology of the host response, immunology and toxicology and self assembly at the nanoscale. Clinical applications include the therapies of medical technology and regenerative medicine in all clinical disciplines, and diagnostic systems that reply on innovative contrast and sensing agents. The journal is relevant to areas such as cancer diagnosis and therapy, implantable devices, drug delivery systems, gene vectors, bionanotechnology and tissue engineering.