通过公私合作治理重新审视无障碍环境:以香港为例

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yuling Yang, Hanxi Ma, Jiangping Zhou
{"title":"通过公私合作治理重新审视无障碍环境:以香港为例","authors":"Yuling Yang,&nbsp;Hanxi Ma,&nbsp;Jiangping Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paradigm shift in urban development from government-dominated planning and construction to multiparty collaborative governance has underscored the importance of public-private sector relationships in enhancing accessibility. While existing scholarships have examined accessibility through the lens of land use and transportation arrangements, little attention has been paid to whether and how public-private collaboration governs accessibility outcomes. To date, three key gaps remain: (1) how the distinct behaviors of public and private sectors contribute to accessibility, (2) whether these behaviors constitute meaningful collaboration, and (3) how the intensity of collaboration influences accessibility outcomes. This study revisits accessibility through the framework of public-private collaborative governance, examining the roles of both sectors in shaping accessibility and assessing how their collaboration intensity affects outcomes. Using a longitudinal case study of metro-land use development in Hong Kong, we find that among different planning approaches for coordinating land use and transit infrastructure, the form and intensity of public-private collaboration play a significant role in accessibility enhancement. Key mechanisms for effective collaboration include: (1) aligning public and private interests in accessibility planning to ensure effective engagement, (2) integrating public planning authority with private capital and expertise to implement solutions, and (3) coordinating strategies to build trust and accelerate integrated land use-transportation development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Pages 157-170"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisit accessibility via governance of public-private collaboration: A case study in Hong Kong\",\"authors\":\"Yuling Yang,&nbsp;Hanxi Ma,&nbsp;Jiangping Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The paradigm shift in urban development from government-dominated planning and construction to multiparty collaborative governance has underscored the importance of public-private sector relationships in enhancing accessibility. While existing scholarships have examined accessibility through the lens of land use and transportation arrangements, little attention has been paid to whether and how public-private collaboration governs accessibility outcomes. To date, three key gaps remain: (1) how the distinct behaviors of public and private sectors contribute to accessibility, (2) whether these behaviors constitute meaningful collaboration, and (3) how the intensity of collaboration influences accessibility outcomes. This study revisits accessibility through the framework of public-private collaborative governance, examining the roles of both sectors in shaping accessibility and assessing how their collaboration intensity affects outcomes. Using a longitudinal case study of metro-land use development in Hong Kong, we find that among different planning approaches for coordinating land use and transit infrastructure, the form and intensity of public-private collaboration play a significant role in accessibility enhancement. Key mechanisms for effective collaboration include: (1) aligning public and private interests in accessibility planning to ensure effective engagement, (2) integrating public planning authority with private capital and expertise to implement solutions, and (3) coordinating strategies to build trust and accelerate integrated land use-transportation development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 157-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002227\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市发展的模式从政府主导的规划和建设转向多方合作治理,突显了公私部门关系在提高可达性方面的重要性。虽然现有的奖学金从土地使用和交通安排的角度考察了可达性,但很少关注公私合作是否以及如何影响可达性的结果。到目前为止,三个关键的差距仍然存在:(1)公共和私营部门的不同行为如何促进可达性,(2)这些行为是否构成有意义的合作,以及(3)合作的强度如何影响可达性结果。本研究通过公私合作治理的框架重新审视了可访问性,考察了这两个部门在塑造可访问性方面的作用,并评估了它们的合作强度如何影响结果。通过对香港地铁土地利用发展的纵向案例研究,我们发现在协调土地利用和交通基础设施的不同规划方法中,公私合作的形式和强度对可达性的提升起着重要作用。有效合作的关键机制包括:(1)协调可达性规划中的公共和私人利益,以确保有效参与;(2)将公共规划当局与私人资本和专业知识相结合,以实施解决方案;(3)协调战略,以建立信任并加速土地利用-交通综合发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisit accessibility via governance of public-private collaboration: A case study in Hong Kong
The paradigm shift in urban development from government-dominated planning and construction to multiparty collaborative governance has underscored the importance of public-private sector relationships in enhancing accessibility. While existing scholarships have examined accessibility through the lens of land use and transportation arrangements, little attention has been paid to whether and how public-private collaboration governs accessibility outcomes. To date, three key gaps remain: (1) how the distinct behaviors of public and private sectors contribute to accessibility, (2) whether these behaviors constitute meaningful collaboration, and (3) how the intensity of collaboration influences accessibility outcomes. This study revisits accessibility through the framework of public-private collaborative governance, examining the roles of both sectors in shaping accessibility and assessing how their collaboration intensity affects outcomes. Using a longitudinal case study of metro-land use development in Hong Kong, we find that among different planning approaches for coordinating land use and transit infrastructure, the form and intensity of public-private collaboration play a significant role in accessibility enhancement. Key mechanisms for effective collaboration include: (1) aligning public and private interests in accessibility planning to ensure effective engagement, (2) integrating public planning authority with private capital and expertise to implement solutions, and (3) coordinating strategies to build trust and accelerate integrated land use-transportation development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信