不平等社会中的天才文化:感知到的经济不平等对偏爱天赋而不是努力的影响

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Hyuna Bak , Youjae Yi
{"title":"不平等社会中的天才文化:感知到的经济不平等对偏爱天赋而不是努力的影响","authors":"Hyuna Bak ,&nbsp;Youjae Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global economic inequality intensifies, its influence on how people evaluate success remains underexplored. This research examines whether inequality shifts attributional preferences toward innate talent over effort across consumer, organizational, and educational contexts. Across four studies, individuals exposed to high-inequality conditions consistently favored talent-based over effort-based performers. This preference was mediated by perceived competitiveness, suggesting that inequality fosters environments where outperforming others with ease is idealized. The shift stemmed more from a devaluation of effort than from increased admiration for talent. By introducing economic inequality as a macro-level factor in performance attributions, this study extends attribution theory and advances our understanding of the psychological effects of inequality. The findings offer practical insights for marketing, hiring, and education, and highlight a growing cultural bias: the elevation of talent and the erosion of recognition for hard work. These results call for a critical rethinking of how merit is defined in unequal societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 115512"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultures of genius in unequal societies: The impact of perceived economic inequality on preferences for talent over effort\",\"authors\":\"Hyuna Bak ,&nbsp;Youjae Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global economic inequality intensifies, its influence on how people evaluate success remains underexplored. This research examines whether inequality shifts attributional preferences toward innate talent over effort across consumer, organizational, and educational contexts. Across four studies, individuals exposed to high-inequality conditions consistently favored talent-based over effort-based performers. This preference was mediated by perceived competitiveness, suggesting that inequality fosters environments where outperforming others with ease is idealized. The shift stemmed more from a devaluation of effort than from increased admiration for talent. By introducing economic inequality as a macro-level factor in performance attributions, this study extends attribution theory and advances our understanding of the psychological effects of inequality. The findings offer practical insights for marketing, hiring, and education, and highlight a growing cultural bias: the elevation of talent and the erosion of recognition for hard work. These results call for a critical rethinking of how merit is defined in unequal societies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003352\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球经济不平等加剧,它对人们如何评估成功的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究考察了在消费者、组织和教育背景下,不平等是否会将归因偏好转移到天生才能而不是努力。在四项研究中,暴露在高度不平等条件下的个体始终更喜欢基于天赋的表演者,而不是基于努力的表演者。这种偏好被感知到的竞争力所调节,这表明不平等助长了轻松超越他人的理想化环境。这种转变更多地源于努力的贬值,而不是对人才的钦佩增加。本研究将经济不平等作为绩效归因的宏观因素引入,拓展了归因理论,促进了我们对不平等心理效应的理解。这些发现为市场营销、招聘和教育提供了实用的见解,并突出了一种日益严重的文化偏见:对人才的推崇和对努力工作的认可的削弱。这些结果要求我们批判性地重新思考在不平等的社会中如何定义功绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cultures of genius in unequal societies: The impact of perceived economic inequality on preferences for talent over effort
As global economic inequality intensifies, its influence on how people evaluate success remains underexplored. This research examines whether inequality shifts attributional preferences toward innate talent over effort across consumer, organizational, and educational contexts. Across four studies, individuals exposed to high-inequality conditions consistently favored talent-based over effort-based performers. This preference was mediated by perceived competitiveness, suggesting that inequality fosters environments where outperforming others with ease is idealized. The shift stemmed more from a devaluation of effort than from increased admiration for talent. By introducing economic inequality as a macro-level factor in performance attributions, this study extends attribution theory and advances our understanding of the psychological effects of inequality. The findings offer practical insights for marketing, hiring, and education, and highlight a growing cultural bias: the elevation of talent and the erosion of recognition for hard work. These results call for a critical rethinking of how merit is defined in unequal societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信