{"title":"不平等社会中的天才文化:感知到的经济不平等对偏爱天赋而不是努力的影响","authors":"Hyuna Bak , Youjae Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global economic inequality intensifies, its influence on how people evaluate success remains underexplored. This research examines whether inequality shifts attributional preferences toward innate talent over effort across consumer, organizational, and educational contexts. Across four studies, individuals exposed to high-inequality conditions consistently favored talent-based over effort-based performers. This preference was mediated by perceived competitiveness, suggesting that inequality fosters environments where outperforming others with ease is idealized. The shift stemmed more from a devaluation of effort than from increased admiration for talent. By introducing economic inequality as a macro-level factor in performance attributions, this study extends attribution theory and advances our understanding of the psychological effects of inequality. The findings offer practical insights for marketing, hiring, and education, and highlight a growing cultural bias: the elevation of talent and the erosion of recognition for hard work. These results call for a critical rethinking of how merit is defined in unequal societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 115512"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultures of genius in unequal societies: The impact of perceived economic inequality on preferences for talent over effort\",\"authors\":\"Hyuna Bak , Youjae Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As global economic inequality intensifies, its influence on how people evaluate success remains underexplored. This research examines whether inequality shifts attributional preferences toward innate talent over effort across consumer, organizational, and educational contexts. Across four studies, individuals exposed to high-inequality conditions consistently favored talent-based over effort-based performers. This preference was mediated by perceived competitiveness, suggesting that inequality fosters environments where outperforming others with ease is idealized. The shift stemmed more from a devaluation of effort than from increased admiration for talent. By introducing economic inequality as a macro-level factor in performance attributions, this study extends attribution theory and advances our understanding of the psychological effects of inequality. The findings offer practical insights for marketing, hiring, and education, and highlight a growing cultural bias: the elevation of talent and the erosion of recognition for hard work. These results call for a critical rethinking of how merit is defined in unequal societies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003352\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325003352","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cultures of genius in unequal societies: The impact of perceived economic inequality on preferences for talent over effort
As global economic inequality intensifies, its influence on how people evaluate success remains underexplored. This research examines whether inequality shifts attributional preferences toward innate talent over effort across consumer, organizational, and educational contexts. Across four studies, individuals exposed to high-inequality conditions consistently favored talent-based over effort-based performers. This preference was mediated by perceived competitiveness, suggesting that inequality fosters environments where outperforming others with ease is idealized. The shift stemmed more from a devaluation of effort than from increased admiration for talent. By introducing economic inequality as a macro-level factor in performance attributions, this study extends attribution theory and advances our understanding of the psychological effects of inequality. The findings offer practical insights for marketing, hiring, and education, and highlight a growing cultural bias: the elevation of talent and the erosion of recognition for hard work. These results call for a critical rethinking of how merit is defined in unequal societies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.